Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(2)

Unified Diff: LayoutTests/fast/repaint/inline-outline-repaint-2-expected.txt

Issue 1164533005: Don't double-inflate visual overflow rect for LayoutInlines (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/blink/trunk
Patch Set: SP TEs. Created 5 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: LayoutTests/fast/repaint/inline-outline-repaint-2-expected.txt
diff --git a/LayoutTests/compositing/layer-creation/compositing-reason-removed-expected.txt b/LayoutTests/fast/repaint/inline-outline-repaint-2-expected.txt
similarity index 77%
copy from LayoutTests/compositing/layer-creation/compositing-reason-removed-expected.txt
copy to LayoutTests/fast/repaint/inline-outline-repaint-2-expected.txt
index 8af78cfc26bcd242b8fa25a430076945267f8e45..a6a99d827382b85151b29baef68dd2adaea5a528 100644
--- a/LayoutTests/compositing/layer-creation/compositing-reason-removed-expected.txt
+++ b/LayoutTests/fast/repaint/inline-outline-repaint-2-expected.txt
@@ -6,7 +6,8 @@
"contentsOpaque": true,
"drawsContent": true,
"repaintRects": [
- [8, 8, 30, 30]
+ [215, 0, 40, 10],
Julien - ping for review 2015/06/08 15:46:11 Why do we have this unneeded invalidation?
fs 2015/06/08 16:15:36 That's the LayoutText (shouldDoFullPaintInvalidati
fs 2015/06/08 16:29:12 Uhm, make that PaintInvalidationStyleChange...
Julien - ping for review 2015/06/08 22:19:48 It's weird that we do 2 invalidations when we don'
+ [210, -5, 50, 20]
]
}
]

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698