Chromium Code Reviews| Index: LayoutTests/fast/repaint/inline-outline-repaint-2-expected.txt |
| diff --git a/LayoutTests/compositing/layer-creation/compositing-reason-removed-expected.txt b/LayoutTests/fast/repaint/inline-outline-repaint-2-expected.txt |
| similarity index 77% |
| copy from LayoutTests/compositing/layer-creation/compositing-reason-removed-expected.txt |
| copy to LayoutTests/fast/repaint/inline-outline-repaint-2-expected.txt |
| index 8af78cfc26bcd242b8fa25a430076945267f8e45..a6a99d827382b85151b29baef68dd2adaea5a528 100644 |
| --- a/LayoutTests/compositing/layer-creation/compositing-reason-removed-expected.txt |
| +++ b/LayoutTests/fast/repaint/inline-outline-repaint-2-expected.txt |
| @@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ |
| "contentsOpaque": true, |
| "drawsContent": true, |
| "repaintRects": [ |
| - [8, 8, 30, 30] |
| + [215, 0, 40, 10], |
|
Julien - ping for review
2015/06/08 15:46:11
Why do we have this unneeded invalidation?
fs
2015/06/08 16:15:36
That's the LayoutText (shouldDoFullPaintInvalidati
fs
2015/06/08 16:29:12
Uhm, make that PaintInvalidationStyleChange...
Julien - ping for review
2015/06/08 22:19:48
It's weird that we do 2 invalidations when we don'
|
| + [210, -5, 50, 20] |
| ] |
| } |
| ] |