Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1236)

Unified Diff: content/browser/devtools/protocol/security_handler.cc

Issue 1163963002: Implement SecurityHandler to send the lock icon status to DevTools. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 5 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/browser/devtools/protocol/security_handler.cc
diff --git a/content/browser/devtools/protocol/security_handler.cc b/content/browser/devtools/protocol/security_handler.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1a6486926663012a01edd38f653510c843285d1a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/browser/devtools/protocol/security_handler.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+// Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
estark 2015/06/04 01:09:15 copyright should be 2015
lgarron 2015/06/05 01:29:18 Done.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include <string>
+
+#include "base/logging.h"
+#include "content/browser/devtools/protocol/security_handler.h"
estark 2015/06/04 01:09:14 This should be at the top of the #include list.
+
+namespace content {
+namespace devtools {
+namespace security {
+
+typedef DevToolsProtocolClient::Response Response;
+
+SecurityHandler::SecurityHandler() : enabled_(false) {
+}
+
+SecurityHandler::~SecurityHandler() {
+}
+
+void SecurityHandler::SetClient(scoped_ptr<Client> client) {
+ client_.swap(client);
+}
+
+void SecurityHandler::SecurityStyleChanged(SecurityStyle security_style) {
+ if (!enabled_)
+ return;
+
+ const std::string security_state =
+ SecurityStyleToProtocolSecurityState(security_style);
+ client_->SecurityStateChanged(
estark 2015/06/05 00:59:10 Ah, just realized this won't build without the pro
lgarron 2015/06/06 00:57:40 I think it would make more sense to land protocol.
+ SecurityStateChangedParams::Create()->set_security_state(security_state));
+}
+
+Response SecurityHandler::Enable() {
+ enabled_ = true;
+ return Response::OK();
+}
+
+Response SecurityHandler::Disable() {
+ enabled_ = false;
+ return Response::FallThrough();
estark 2015/06/04 01:09:14 I think this should be Response::OK() like Enable(
lgarron 2015/06/05 01:29:18 Makes sense (I trust you on verifying that's what
+}
+
+std::string SecurityHandler::SecurityStyleToProtocolSecurityState(
+ SecurityStyle security_style) {
+ switch (security_style) {
+ case SECURITY_STYLE_UNKNOWN:
+ return "UNKNOWN";
estark 2015/06/04 01:09:15 It looks like constants for these enum values will
lgarron 2015/06/05 01:29:18 Done.
+ case SECURITY_STYLE_UNAUTHENTICATED:
+ return "HTTP";
+ case SECURITY_STYLE_AUTHENTICATION_BROKEN:
+ return "INSECURE";
+ case SECURITY_STYLE_WARNING:
+ return "WARNING";
+ case SECURITY_STYLE_AUTHENTICATED:
+ return "SECURE";
+ default:
estark 2015/06/04 01:09:14 Same comment here that I put in the other CL; I pr
pfeldman 2015/06/04 09:28:35 @estark: it is a good idea here, but don't do that
lgarron 2015/06/05 01:29:18 Good point. I'll leave it this way for now.
+ NOTREACHED();
+ }
+}
+
+} // namespace security
+} // namespace devtools
+} // namespace content

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698