FTP: misc fixes resulting from my testing.

net/ftp/ftp_directory_listing_parser_ls_unittest.cc

Index: net/ftp/ftp_directory_listing_parser_ls_unittest.cc
diff --git a/net/ftp/ftp_directory_listing_parser_ls_unittest.cc b/net/ftp/ftp_directory_listing_parser_ls_unittest.cc
index 9da23cf429fe2c4f513b703b896464a72bf29f87..354177024562820df9ac75c02cfc9bc9e6a5a1a8 100644
--- a/net/ftp/ftp_directory_listing_parser_ls_unittest.cc
+++ b/net/ftp/ftp_directory_listing_parser_ls_unittest.cc
@@ -124,6 +124,21 @@ TEST_F(FtpDirectoryListingParserLsTest, Good) {
     { "-rwxrwxrwx 2 root root  4096 2012-02-07 00:31 notas_servico",
       FtpDirectoryListingEntry::FILE, "notas_servico", 4096,
       2012, 2, 7, 0, 31 },
+
+    // Weird permission bits.
+    { "drwx--l---   2 0        10           512 Dec 22  1994 swetzel",
+      FtpDirectoryListingEntry::DIRECTORY, "swetzel", -1,
+      1994, 12, 22, 0, 0 },
+    { "drwxr-sr-x   5 22623    10           512 Jan 17  1996 sat-files",
+      FtpDirectoryListingEntry::DIRECTORY, "sat-files", -1,
+      1996, 1, 17, 0, 0 },

[mmenke, 2012/12/03 21:59:05]

Does this differ in any significant way from the 5th test?

"drwxrwsr-x    4 501      501          4096 Feb 20  2007 pub"

+
+    // Garbage in date (but still parseable).
+    { "lrw-rw-rw-   1 user     group         542 "
+      "/t11/member/incomingFeb  8  2007 "
+      "Shortcut to incoming.lnk -> /t11/member/incoming",
+      FtpDirectoryListingEntry::SYMLINK, "Shortcut to incoming.lnk", -1,
+      2007, 2, 8, 0, 0 },
   };
   for (size_t i = 0; i < arraysize(good_cases); i++) {
     SCOPED_TRACE(base::StringPrintf("Test[%" PRIuS "]: %s", i,