Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(3150)

Unified Diff: cc/tiles/picture_layer_tiling.cc

Issue 1139063002: cc: Partial tile update for one-copy raster. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: monocle: slightlylessstruct Created 5 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: cc/tiles/picture_layer_tiling.cc
diff --git a/cc/tiles/picture_layer_tiling.cc b/cc/tiles/picture_layer_tiling.cc
index 03bf211659a017c08cf3c8193b007b8992f6f8fd..fd64ce09a61e35c57d85b716727da292fa02f545 100644
--- a/cc/tiles/picture_layer_tiling.cc
+++ b/cc/tiles/picture_layer_tiling.cc
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
#include <limits>
#include <set>
+#include "base/containers/hash_tables.h"
+#include "base/containers/small_map.h"
#include "base/logging.h"
#include "base/trace_event/trace_event.h"
#include "base/trace_event/trace_event_argument.h"
@@ -230,11 +232,11 @@ void PictureLayerTiling::SetRasterSourceAndResize(
// Drop tiles outside the new layer bounds if the layer shrank.
for (int i = after_right + 1; i <= before_right; ++i) {
for (int j = before_top; j <= before_bottom; ++j)
- RemoveTileAt(i, j);
+ RemoveTileAt(i, j, nullptr);
}
for (int i = before_left; i <= after_right; ++i) {
for (int j = after_bottom + 1; j <= before_bottom; ++j)
- RemoveTileAt(i, j);
+ RemoveTileAt(i, j, nullptr);
}
if (after_right > before_right) {
@@ -265,39 +267,48 @@ void PictureLayerTiling::RemoveTilesInRegion(const Region& layer_invalidation,
// twin, so it's slated for removal in the future.
if (live_tiles_rect_.IsEmpty())
return;
- std::vector<TileMapKey> new_tile_keys;
+ base::SmallMap<base::hash_map<TileMapKey, gfx::Rect>, 16> remove_tiles;
reveman 2015/05/28 05:07:25 why 16? can we remove this magic value or add a co
danakj 2015/05/28 18:54:47 Done.
gfx::Rect expanded_live_tiles_rect =
tiling_data_.ExpandRectIgnoringBordersToTileBounds(live_tiles_rect_);
for (Region::Iterator iter(layer_invalidation); iter.has_rect();
iter.next()) {
gfx::Rect layer_rect = iter.rect();
- gfx::Rect content_rect =
+ // The pixels which are invalid in content space.
+ gfx::Rect invalid_content_rect =
gfx::ScaleToEnclosingRect(layer_rect, contents_scale_);
// Consider tiles inside the live tiles rect even if only their border
// pixels intersect the invalidation. But don't consider tiles outside
// the live tiles rect with the same conditions, as they won't exist.
+ gfx::Rect coverage_content_rect = invalid_content_rect;
int border_pixels = tiling_data_.border_texels();
- content_rect.Inset(-border_pixels, -border_pixels);
+ coverage_content_rect.Inset(-border_pixels, -border_pixels);
// Avoid needless work by not bothering to invalidate where there aren't
// tiles.
- content_rect.Intersect(expanded_live_tiles_rect);
- if (content_rect.IsEmpty())
+ coverage_content_rect.Intersect(expanded_live_tiles_rect);
+ if (coverage_content_rect.IsEmpty())
continue;
// Since the content_rect includes border pixels already, don't include
// borders when iterating to avoid double counting them.
bool include_borders = false;
- for (
- TilingData::Iterator iter(&tiling_data_, content_rect, include_borders);
- iter; ++iter) {
- if (RemoveTileAt(iter.index_x(), iter.index_y())) {
- if (recreate_tiles)
- new_tile_keys.push_back(TileMapKey(iter.index()));
- }
+ for (TilingData::Iterator iter(&tiling_data_, coverage_content_rect,
+ include_borders);
+ iter; ++iter) {
+ // This also adds the TileMapKey to the map.
+ remove_tiles[TileMapKey(iter.index())].Union(invalid_content_rect);
}
}
- for (const auto& key : new_tile_keys)
- CreateTile(key.index_x, key.index_y);
+ for (const auto& pair : remove_tiles) {
+ const TileMapKey& key = pair.first;
+ const gfx::Rect& invalid_content_rect = pair.second;
+ Tile::Id old_id(0);
+ // TODO(danakj): This |old_id| will be empty if we are committing to a
+ // pending tree since there is no tile there to remove. crbug.com/490847
+ if (RemoveTileAt(key.index_x, key.index_y, &old_id) && recreate_tiles) {
+ if (Tile* tile = CreateTile(key.index_x, key.index_y))
+ tile->SetInvalidated(invalid_content_rect, old_id);
+ }
+ }
}
bool PictureLayerTiling::ShouldCreateTileAt(int i, int j) const {
@@ -495,10 +506,12 @@ gfx::RectF PictureLayerTiling::CoverageIterator::texture_rect() const {
return texture_rect;
}
-bool PictureLayerTiling::RemoveTileAt(int i, int j) {
+bool PictureLayerTiling::RemoveTileAt(int i, int j, Tile::Id* id) {
TileMap::iterator found = tiles_.find(TileMapKey(i, j));
if (found == tiles_.end())
return false;
+ if (id)
+ *id = found->second->id();
tiles_.erase(found);
return true;
}
@@ -663,7 +676,7 @@ void PictureLayerTiling::SetLiveTilesRect(
for (TilingData::DifferenceIterator iter(&tiling_data_, live_tiles_rect_,
new_live_tiles_rect);
iter; ++iter) {
- RemoveTileAt(iter.index_x(), iter.index_y());
+ RemoveTileAt(iter.index_x(), iter.index_y(), nullptr);
}
// Iterate to allocate new tiles for all regions with newly exposed area.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698