Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(470)

Issue 11115018: Better handling of permission errors during install. (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 2 months ago by Sam Clegg
Modified:
8 years, 2 months ago
Reviewers:
noelallen1, binji
CC:
native-client-reviews_googlegroups.com
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Better handling of permission errors during install. Error messages are now more accurate and descriptive. BUG=155411, 151684 Committed: https://code.google.com/p/nativeclient-sdk/source/detail?r=1448

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+10 lines, -2 lines) Patch
M visual_studio/NativeClientVSAddIn/InstallerResources/install.py View 2 chunks +10 lines, -2 lines 2 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 6 (0 generated)
Sam Clegg
8 years, 2 months ago (2012-10-12 18:37:46 UTC) #1
binji
lgtm http://codereview.chromium.org/11115018/diff/1/visual_studio/NativeClientVSAddIn/InstallerResources/install.py File visual_studio/NativeClientVSAddIn/InstallerResources/install.py (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/11115018/diff/1/visual_studio/NativeClientVSAddIn/InstallerResources/install.py#newcode261 visual_studio/NativeClientVSAddIn/InstallerResources/install.py:261: "have them locked.") You probably still want to ...
8 years, 2 months ago (2012-10-12 18:43:02 UTC) #2
binji
Also, we should really have tests for all of these cases.
8 years, 2 months ago (2012-10-12 18:43:37 UTC) #3
Sam Clegg
http://codereview.chromium.org/11115018/diff/1/visual_studio/NativeClientVSAddIn/InstallerResources/install.py File visual_studio/NativeClientVSAddIn/InstallerResources/install.py (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/11115018/diff/1/visual_studio/NativeClientVSAddIn/InstallerResources/install.py#newcode261 visual_studio/NativeClientVSAddIn/InstallerResources/install.py:261: "have them locked.") On 2012/10/12 18:43:02, binji wrote: > ...
8 years, 2 months ago (2012-10-12 18:51:58 UTC) #4
Sam Clegg
On 2012/10/12 18:43:37, binji wrote: > Also, we should really have tests for all of ...
8 years, 2 months ago (2012-10-12 18:53:44 UTC) #5
binji
8 years, 2 months ago (2012-10-12 18:55:14 UTC) #6
On 2012/10/12 18:53:44, Sam Clegg wrote:
> On 2012/10/12 18:43:37, binji wrote:
> > Also, we should really have tests for all of these cases.
> 
> Hm.. interesting.  Let me think about how best to do that.
> Are you thinking unittests of these python functions or
> end to end tests that run the install.bat and see what it
> produces?

End to end tests, probably. It would be good to verify that we can reproduce
errors that users may see.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698