Chromium Code Reviews| Index: LayoutTests/svg/stroke/stroke-width-rem-type-expected.txt |
| diff --git a/LayoutTests/svg/stroke/stroke-width-rem-type-expected.txt b/LayoutTests/svg/stroke/stroke-width-rem-type-expected.txt |
| new file mode 100644 |
| index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4d4110898f4e8e9b7b8e824559fc809b16752373 |
| --- /dev/null |
| +++ b/LayoutTests/svg/stroke/stroke-width-rem-type-expected.txt |
| @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ |
| +layer at (0,0) size 800x600 |
| + LayoutView at (0,0) size 800x600 |
| +layer at (0,0) size 800x121 |
| + LayoutBlockFlow {HTML} at (0,0) size 800x121 |
| + LayoutBlockFlow {BODY} at (8,8) size 784x105 |
| + LayoutSVGRoot {svg} at (8,8) size 100x100 |
| + LayoutSVGPath {line} at (8,8) size 100x100 [stroke={[type=SOLID] [color=#FF0000] [stroke width=32.00]}] [fill={[type=SOLID] [color=#000000]}] [x1=0.00] [y1=0.00] [x2=100.00] [y2=100.00] |
|
Erik Dahlström (inactive)
2015/03/26 16:11:03
Why not make this an svg reftest instead, as in us
Shanmuga Pandi
2015/03/30 14:40:14
Acknowledged.
Erik Dahlström (inactive)
2015/03/30 15:14:19
Still looks like this uses png references, and I t
|
| + LayoutText {#text} at (0,0) size 0x0 |