| Index: LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic.html
|
| diff --git a/LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic.html b/LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic.html
|
| index ef1c5ac29c9670edea978db9561722f47ee6be8e..ccf8a6b44cba7fe9fe339a7ccf11fee3cfbb2e9b 100644
|
| --- a/LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic.html
|
| +++ b/LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic.html
|
| @@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
|
| <!DOCTYPE html>
|
| -<html>
|
| -<head>
|
| <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
|
| <style>
|
| .resultsDiv {
|
| @@ -17,8 +15,6 @@
|
| height: 400px;
|
| }
|
| </style>
|
| -</head>
|
| -<body>
|
| <div>This table shows unicode-bidi: isolate behavior (in red) with display: inline-block behavior overlapping in green. You should see no red in this test! Behavior between these two methods should be identical for non-wrapping strings, assuming unicode-bidi: isolate is implemented and functioning correctly.</div>
|
|
|
| <div id="resultsContainer" style="position: relative">
|
| @@ -74,5 +70,3 @@ for (outerDirIndex in possibleDirs) {
|
|
|
| </script>
|
| </table>
|
| -</body>
|
| -</html>
|
|
|