Index: LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic.html |
diff --git a/LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic.html b/LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic.html |
index ef1c5ac29c9670edea978db9561722f47ee6be8e..ccf8a6b44cba7fe9fe339a7ccf11fee3cfbb2e9b 100644 |
--- a/LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic.html |
+++ b/LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic.html |
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@ |
<!DOCTYPE html> |
-<html> |
-<head> |
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> |
<style> |
.resultsDiv { |
@@ -17,8 +15,6 @@ |
height: 400px; |
} |
</style> |
-</head> |
-<body> |
<div>This table shows unicode-bidi: isolate behavior (in red) with display: inline-block behavior overlapping in green. You should see no red in this test! Behavior between these two methods should be identical for non-wrapping strings, assuming unicode-bidi: isolate is implemented and functioning correctly.</div> |
<div id="resultsContainer" style="position: relative"> |
@@ -74,5 +70,3 @@ for (outerDirIndex in possibleDirs) { |
</script> |
</table> |
-</body> |
-</html> |