Index: LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic-expected.html |
diff --git a/LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic.html b/LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic-expected.html |
similarity index 94% |
copy from LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic.html |
copy to LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic-expected.html |
index ef1c5ac29c9670edea978db9561722f47ee6be8e..c87c61e23073656347e1f1de5c3ed9b4f12cfea3 100644 |
--- a/LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic.html |
+++ b/LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic-expected.html |
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@ |
<!DOCTYPE html> |
-<html> |
-<head> |
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> |
<style> |
.resultsDiv { |
@@ -17,8 +15,6 @@ |
height: 400px; |
} |
</style> |
-</head> |
-<body> |
<div>This table shows unicode-bidi: isolate behavior (in red) with display: inline-block behavior overlapping in green. You should see no red in this test! Behavior between these two methods should be identical for non-wrapping strings, assuming unicode-bidi: isolate is implemented and functioning correctly.</div> |
<div id="resultsContainer" style="position: relative"> |
@@ -38,7 +34,6 @@ var strongLTR = function() { return strongLTRs[seed++ % strongLTRs.length]; } |
var charClassExamples = [neutral, strongRTL, strongLTR]; |
var possibleDirs = ['ltr', 'rtl']; |
-var testStyle = "unicode-bidi: -webkit-isolate"; |
var controlStyle = "display: inline-block"; |
for (outerDirIndex in possibleDirs) { |
@@ -65,7 +60,7 @@ for (outerDirIndex in possibleDirs) { |
return outerDiv; |
} |
expected.appendChild(caseWithStyle(controlStyle)); |
- actual.appendChild(caseWithStyle(testStyle)); |
+ actual.appendChild(caseWithStyle(controlStyle)); |
} |
} |
} |
@@ -74,5 +69,3 @@ for (outerDirIndex in possibleDirs) { |
</script> |
</table> |
-</body> |
-</html> |