| Index: LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic-expected.html
|
| diff --git a/LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic.html b/LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic-expected.html
|
| similarity index 94%
|
| copy from LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic.html
|
| copy to LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic-expected.html
|
| index ef1c5ac29c9670edea978db9561722f47ee6be8e..c87c61e23073656347e1f1de5c3ed9b4f12cfea3 100644
|
| --- a/LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic.html
|
| +++ b/LayoutTests/css3/unicode-bidi-isolate-basic-expected.html
|
| @@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
|
| <!DOCTYPE html>
|
| -<html>
|
| -<head>
|
| <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
|
| <style>
|
| .resultsDiv {
|
| @@ -17,8 +15,6 @@
|
| height: 400px;
|
| }
|
| </style>
|
| -</head>
|
| -<body>
|
| <div>This table shows unicode-bidi: isolate behavior (in red) with display: inline-block behavior overlapping in green. You should see no red in this test! Behavior between these two methods should be identical for non-wrapping strings, assuming unicode-bidi: isolate is implemented and functioning correctly.</div>
|
|
|
| <div id="resultsContainer" style="position: relative">
|
| @@ -38,7 +34,6 @@ var strongLTR = function() { return strongLTRs[seed++ % strongLTRs.length]; }
|
| var charClassExamples = [neutral, strongRTL, strongLTR];
|
| var possibleDirs = ['ltr', 'rtl'];
|
|
|
| -var testStyle = "unicode-bidi: -webkit-isolate";
|
| var controlStyle = "display: inline-block";
|
|
|
| for (outerDirIndex in possibleDirs) {
|
| @@ -65,7 +60,7 @@ for (outerDirIndex in possibleDirs) {
|
| return outerDiv;
|
| }
|
| expected.appendChild(caseWithStyle(controlStyle));
|
| - actual.appendChild(caseWithStyle(testStyle));
|
| + actual.appendChild(caseWithStyle(controlStyle));
|
| }
|
| }
|
| }
|
| @@ -74,5 +69,3 @@ for (outerDirIndex in possibleDirs) {
|
|
|
| </script>
|
| </table>
|
| -</body>
|
| -</html>
|
|
|