Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1455)

Unified Diff: cc/surfaces/display.cc

Issue 1012853003: Add DisplayScheduler for Surfaces (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: use heuristic for active surfaces; avoid drawing while resources locked; Created 5 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: cc/surfaces/display.cc
diff --git a/cc/surfaces/display.cc b/cc/surfaces/display.cc
index 7ec46727385581123b61289e353b1d6d98821024..fd4630d1d50e03b9012b866c8fd08f95c950b14c 100644
--- a/cc/surfaces/display.cc
+++ b/cc/surfaces/display.cc
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include "cc/output/software_renderer.h"
#include "cc/resources/texture_mailbox_deleter.h"
#include "cc/surfaces/display_client.h"
+#include "cc/surfaces/display_scheduler.h"
#include "cc/surfaces/surface.h"
#include "cc/surfaces/surface_aggregator.h"
#include "cc/surfaces/surface_manager.h"
@@ -32,7 +33,9 @@ Display::Display(DisplayClient* client,
bitmap_manager_(bitmap_manager),
gpu_memory_buffer_manager_(gpu_memory_buffer_manager),
settings_(settings),
+ current_surface_has_resources_(false),
brianderson 2015/04/03 01:35:48 jbauman: Can you check my logic for how I update t
device_scale_factor_(1.f),
+ scheduler_(nullptr),
blocking_main_thread_task_runner_(
BlockingTaskRunner::Create(base::MessageLoopProxy::current())),
texture_mailbox_deleter_(
@@ -51,15 +54,32 @@ Display::~Display() {
}
}
-bool Display::Initialize(scoped_ptr<OutputSurface> output_surface) {
+bool Display::Initialize(scoped_ptr<OutputSurface> output_surface,
+ DisplayScheduler* scheduler) {
output_surface_ = output_surface.Pass();
+ scheduler_ = scheduler;
return output_surface_->BindToClient(this);
}
void Display::SetSurfaceId(SurfaceId id, float device_scale_factor) {
+ if (current_surface_id_ == id && device_scale_factor_ == device_scale_factor)
brianderson 2015/04/03 01:35:48 jbauman: Is this early return ok to avoid calling
jbauman 2015/04/03 22:27:51 In general this should be ok, as OnSurfaceDamaged
+ return;
+
current_surface_id_ = id;
+
+ current_surface_has_resources_ = true;
+ Surface* surface = manager_->GetSurfaceForId(id);
+ if (surface) {
+ const CompositorFrame* current_frame = surface->GetEligibleFrame();
+ if (!current_frame || !current_frame->delegated_frame_data ||
+ !current_frame->delegated_frame_data->resource_list.size()) {
+ current_surface_has_resources_ = false;
+ }
+ }
+
device_scale_factor_ = device_scale_factor;
- client_->DisplayDamaged();
+ if (scheduler_)
+ scheduler_->EntireDisplayDamaged();
}
void Display::Resize(const gfx::Size& size) {
@@ -70,7 +90,8 @@ void Display::Resize(const gfx::Size& size) {
if (renderer_ && settings_.finish_rendering_on_resize)
renderer_->Finish();
current_surface_size_ = size;
- client_->DisplayDamaged();
+ if (scheduler_)
+ scheduler_->EntireDisplayDamaged();
}
void Display::InitializeRenderer() {
@@ -106,6 +127,11 @@ void Display::InitializeRenderer() {
void Display::DidLoseOutputSurface() {
client_->OutputSurfaceLost();
+ scheduler_->OutputSurfaceLost();
+}
+
+bool Display::CurrentSurfaceHasResources() {
+ return current_surface_has_resources_;
}
bool Display::Draw() {
@@ -180,16 +206,17 @@ bool Display::Draw() {
}
void Display::DidSwapBuffers() {
- client_->DidSwapBuffers();
+ scheduler_->DidSwapBuffers();
}
void Display::DidSwapBuffersComplete() {
- client_->DidSwapBuffersComplete();
+ scheduler_->DidSwapBuffersComplete();
}
void Display::CommitVSyncParameters(base::TimeTicks timebase,
base::TimeDelta interval) {
client_->CommitVSyncParameters(timebase, interval);
+ scheduler_->CommitVSyncParameters(timebase, interval);
}
void Display::SetMemoryPolicy(const ManagedMemoryPolicy& policy) {
@@ -200,16 +227,22 @@ void Display::OnSurfaceDamaged(SurfaceId surface_id, bool* changed) {
if (aggregator_ &&
aggregator_->previous_contained_surfaces().count(surface_id)) {
Surface* surface = manager_->GetSurfaceForId(surface_id);
+ bool has_resources = true;
if (surface) {
const CompositorFrame* current_frame = surface->GetEligibleFrame();
if (!current_frame || !current_frame->delegated_frame_data ||
- !current_frame->delegated_frame_data->resource_list.size())
+ !current_frame->delegated_frame_data->resource_list.size()) {
aggregator_->ReleaseResources(surface_id);
+ has_resources = false;
+ }
}
- client_->DisplayDamaged();
+ if (surface_id == current_surface_id_)
+ current_surface_has_resources_ = has_resources;
+ scheduler_->SurfaceDamaged(surface_id);
*changed = true;
} else if (surface_id == current_surface_id_) {
- client_->DisplayDamaged();
+ current_surface_has_resources_ = true;
jbauman 2015/04/03 22:27:51 This may not necessarily be true - we probably nee
+ scheduler_->SurfaceDamaged(surface_id);
*changed = true;
}
}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698