Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(250)

Unified Diff: base/threading/thread.cc

Issue 1011683002: Lazily initialize MessageLoop for faster thread startup (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: non-blocking thread_id() Created 5 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: base/threading/thread.cc
diff --git a/base/threading/thread.cc b/base/threading/thread.cc
index ea5b1747e3836a8092517b19e8197d1cf3debb62..6e7dcfa86ac1b828b352172c287dcf848dd53148 100644
--- a/base/threading/thread.cc
+++ b/base/threading/thread.cc
@@ -36,20 +36,6 @@ void ThreadQuitHelper() {
Thread::SetThreadWasQuitProperly(true);
}
-// Used to pass data to ThreadMain. This structure is allocated on the stack
-// from within StartWithOptions.
-struct Thread::StartupData {
- // We get away with a const reference here because of how we are allocated.
- const Thread::Options& options;
-
- // Used to synchronize thread startup.
- WaitableEvent event;
-
- explicit StartupData(const Options& opt)
- : options(opt),
- event(false, false) {}
-};
-
Thread::Options::Options()
: message_loop_type(MessageLoop::TYPE_DEFAULT),
timer_slack(TIMER_SLACK_NONE),
@@ -71,13 +57,10 @@ Thread::Thread(const std::string& name)
#if defined(OS_WIN)
com_status_(NONE),
#endif
- started_(false),
stopping_(false),
running_(false),
- startup_data_(NULL),
thread_(0),
- message_loop_(NULL),
- thread_id_(kInvalidThreadId),
+ message_loop_(nullptr),
name_(name) {
}
@@ -108,34 +91,49 @@ bool Thread::StartWithOptions(const Options& options) {
SetThreadWasQuitProperly(false);
- StartupData startup_data(options);
- startup_data_ = &startup_data;
+ scoped_ptr<MessageLoop::LazyInitOptions> message_loop_options(
+ new MessageLoop::LazyInitOptions);
+ message_loop_options->message_loop_type = options.message_loop_type;
+ message_loop_options->message_pump_factory = options.message_pump_factory;
+ message_loop_options->timer_slack = options.timer_slack;
+ message_loop_ = MessageLoop::CreateForLazyInit(message_loop_options.Pass());
+
+ start_event_.reset(new WaitableEvent(false, false));
if (!PlatformThread::Create(options.stack_size, this, &thread_)) {
DLOG(ERROR) << "failed to create thread";
- startup_data_ = NULL;
+ delete message_loop_;
+ message_loop_ = NULL;
+ start_event_.reset();
return false;
}
- // TODO(eroman): Remove once crbug.com/465458 is solved.
- tracked_objects::ScopedTracker tracking_profile_wait(
- FROM_HERE_WITH_EXPLICIT_FUNCTION(
- "465458 base::Thread::StartWithOptions (Wait)"));
-
- // Wait for the thread to start and initialize message_loop_
- base::ThreadRestrictions::ScopedAllowWait allow_wait;
- startup_data.event.Wait();
+ DCHECK(message_loop_);
+ return true;
+}
- // set it to NULL so we don't keep a pointer to some object on the stack.
- startup_data_ = NULL;
- started_ = true;
+bool Thread::StartAndWait() {
+ bool result = Start();
+ if (!result)
+ return result;
+ WaitUntilThreadStarted();
+ return result;
+}
- DCHECK(message_loop_);
+bool Thread::WaitUntilThreadStarted() {
+ if (!start_event_)
+ return false;
+ // TODO(kinuko): Remove once crbug.com/465458 is solved.
+ tracked_objects::ScopedTracker tracking_profile(
+ FROM_HERE_WITH_EXPLICIT_FUNCTION(
+ "465458 base::Thread::WaitUntilThreadStarted()"));
+ base::ThreadRestrictions::ScopedAllowWait allow_wait;
+ start_event_->Wait();
return true;
}
void Thread::Stop() {
- if (!started_)
+ if (!start_event_)
return;
StopSoon();
@@ -151,7 +149,7 @@ void Thread::Stop() {
DCHECK(!message_loop_);
// The thread no longer needs to be joined.
- started_ = false;
+ start_event_.reset();
stopping_ = false;
}
@@ -159,9 +157,7 @@ void Thread::Stop() {
void Thread::StopSoon() {
// We should only be called on the same thread that started us.
- // Reading thread_id_ without a lock can lead to a benign data race
- // with ThreadMain, so we annotate it to stay silent under ThreadSanitizer.
- DCHECK_NE(ANNOTATE_UNPROTECTED_READ(thread_id_), PlatformThread::CurrentId());
+ DCHECK_NE(thread_id(), PlatformThread::CurrentId());
if (stopping_ || !message_loop_)
return;
@@ -171,13 +167,15 @@ void Thread::StopSoon() {
}
bool Thread::IsRunning() const {
- return running_;
+ if (stopping_)
rvargas (doing something else) 2015/03/26 02:19:27 Now I see... there's a giant lock in Stop (Join),
kinuko 2015/04/13 02:02:59 Not only for testing but also in production code (
+ return IsInRunLoop();
+ return !!start_event_;
}
void Thread::SetPriority(ThreadPriority priority) {
// The thread must be started (and id known) for this to be
// compatible with all platforms.
- DCHECK_NE(thread_id_, kInvalidThreadId);
+ DCHECK(!!start_event_);
rvargas (doing something else) 2015/03/26 02:19:27 nit: shouldn't need !! (scoped_ptr is testable)
kinuko 2015/04/13 02:02:59 Done.
PlatformThread::SetThreadPriority(thread_, priority);
}
@@ -199,24 +197,16 @@ bool Thread::GetThreadWasQuitProperly() {
void Thread::ThreadMain() {
{
rvargas (doing something else) 2015/03/26 02:19:27 nit: remove this
kinuko 2015/04/13 02:03:00 Done.
- // The message loop for this thread.
- // Allocated on the heap to centralize any leak reports at this line.
- scoped_ptr<MessageLoop> message_loop;
- if (!startup_data_->options.message_pump_factory.is_null()) {
- message_loop.reset(
- new MessageLoop(startup_data_->options.message_pump_factory.Run()));
- } else {
- message_loop.reset(
- new MessageLoop(startup_data_->options.message_loop_type));
- }
-
// Complete the initialization of our Thread object.
- thread_id_ = PlatformThread::CurrentId();
+ DCHECK_EQ(thread_id(), PlatformThread::CurrentId());
PlatformThread::SetName(name_.c_str());
ANNOTATE_THREAD_NAME(name_.c_str()); // Tell the name to race detector.
- message_loop->set_thread_name(name_);
- message_loop->SetTimerSlack(startup_data_->options.timer_slack);
- message_loop_ = message_loop.get();
+
+ // Lazily initialize the message_loop so that it can run on this thread.
+ DCHECK(message_loop_);
+ scoped_ptr<MessageLoop> message_loop(message_loop_);
rvargas (doing something else) 2015/03/26 02:19:28 Is this intentional?
kinuko 2015/04/13 02:03:00 Sort of. (This needs to be freed at the end of mai
+ message_loop_->set_thread_name(name_);
+ message_loop_->LazyInit();
#if defined(OS_WIN)
scoped_ptr<win::ScopedCOMInitializer> com_initializer;
@@ -228,16 +218,21 @@ void Thread::ThreadMain() {
#endif
// Let the thread do extra initialization.
- // Let's do this before signaling we are started.
Init();
- running_ = true;
- startup_data_->event.Signal();
- // startup_data_ can't be touched anymore since the starting thread is now
- // unlocked.
+ {
+ AutoLock lock(lock_);
+ running_ = true;
+ }
+
+ start_event_->Signal();
Run(message_loop_);
- running_ = false;
+
+ {
+ AutoLock lock(lock_);
+ running_ = false;
+ }
// Let the thread do extra cleanup.
CleanUp();
@@ -254,4 +249,9 @@ void Thread::ThreadMain() {
}
}
+bool Thread::IsInRunLoop() const {
+ base::AutoLock lock(lock_);
+ return running_;
+}
+
} // namespace base

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698