Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(39)

Issue 207373002: Report fail in html_config when fail happens. I believe this was why we were (Closed)

Created:
6 years, 9 months ago by Siggi Cherem (dart-lang)
Modified:
6 years, 9 months ago
CC:
reviews_dartlang.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Report fail in html_config when fail happens. I believe this was why we were getting messages that say: "Warning: Test had 'FAIL' and 'PASS' in stdout." R=jmesserly@google.com Committed: https://code.google.com/p/dart/source/detail?r=34218

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+2 lines, -1 line) Patch
M pkg/unittest/lib/html_config.dart View 1 chunk +2 lines, -1 line 2 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4 (0 generated)
Siggi Cherem (dart-lang)
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-20 23:59:54 UTC) #1
Jennifer Messerly
lgtm https://codereview.chromium.org/207373002/diff/1/pkg/unittest/lib/html_config.dart File pkg/unittest/lib/html_config.dart (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/207373002/diff/1/pkg/unittest/lib/html_config.dart#newcode170 pkg/unittest/lib/html_config.dart:170: success ? 'unittest-suite-done' : 'unittest-suite-fail', '*'); nice! I ...
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-21 00:27:50 UTC) #2
Siggi Cherem (dart-lang)
Committed patchset #1 manually as r34218 (presubmit successful).
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-21 00:30:01 UTC) #3
Jennifer Messerly
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-21 01:02:35 UTC) #4
Message was sent while issue was closed.
https://codereview.chromium.org/207373002/diff/1/pkg/unittest/lib/html_config...
File pkg/unittest/lib/html_config.dart (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/207373002/diff/1/pkg/unittest/lib/html_config...
pkg/unittest/lib/html_config.dart:170: success ? 'unittest-suite-done' :
'unittest-suite-fail', '*');
On 2014/03/21 00:27:50, John Messerly wrote:
> nice! I hit this same line a while back. Didn't fix it at the time for reasons
I
> can't recall. But definitely better than the current logic that prints PASS
and
> FAIL...

Aha, here's the history behind this :)
https://codereview.chromium.org/75393002/

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698