Issue 8198001: Rebase the expected executable size on Linux 64 bit after the

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Issue 8198001: Rebase the expected executable size on Linux 64 bit after the (Closed)

Created:
9 years, 2 months ago by Erik Corry

Modified:
9 years, 2 months ago

Reviewers:
cmp, joth, Satish

CC:
chromium-reviews, pam+watch_chromium.org

Base URL:
svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src/

Visibility:
Public.

Description

Rebase the expected executable size on Linux 64 bit after the incremental GC for V8 landed. Also rebase the expected number of static initializers, until we find out what caused it. Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=104473

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : '' #

Created: 9 years, 2 months ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

		Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Delta from patch set	Stats (+2 lines, -2 lines)			Patch
	M	tools/perf_expectations/perf_expectations.json	View	1	1 chunk	+2 lines, -2 lines	0 comments	Download

Messages

Total messages: 7 (0 generated)

Expand Messages | Collapse Messages

Satish

LGTM. Lets follow up on the size and static initializer increase offline

9 years, 2 months ago (2011-10-07 13:28:55 UTC) #2

joth

Just to close the loop on this one, are there bugs for the size and ...

9 years, 2 months ago (2011-10-07 17:54:20 UTC) #4

cmp

On 2011/10/07 17:54:20, joth wrote: > Just to close the loop on this one, are ...

9 years, 2 months ago (2011-10-07 18:06:02 UTC) #6

Erik Corry

9 years, 2 months ago (2011-10-07 18:23:02 UTC) #7

Yes 2 newest bugs on v8 bug tracker
On Oct 7, 2011 7:54 PM, <joth@chromium.org> wrote:

> Just to close the loop on this one, are there bugs for the size and static
> initializer increases? This looks a bit easy to get lost as is.
>
>
>
http://codereview.chromium.**org/8198001/<http://codereview.chromium.org/8198...
>

Expand Messages | Collapse Messages