Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(191)

Issue 7134061: ui/base/models: Rewrite the TreeNodeModelTest.RemoveAllNodes unittest. (Closed)

Created:
9 years, 6 months ago by tfarina
Modified:
9 years, 6 months ago
Reviewers:
sky
CC:
chromium-reviews, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
Visibility:
Public.

Description

ui/base/models: Rewrite the TreeNodeModelTest.RemoveAllNodes unittest. - This improves and simplifies the tests covered in RemoveAllNodes. BUG=None TEST=app_unittests --gtest_filter=TreeNodeModelTest.RemoveAllNodes R=sky@chromium.org Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=88672

Patch Set 1 : #

Patch Set 2 : #

Patch Set 3 : #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 4 : add assertions for child1 & foo #

Patch Set 5 : better comment #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+30 lines, -30 lines) Patch
M ui/base/models/tree_node_model_unittest.cc View 1 2 3 4 2 chunks +30 lines, -30 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
tfarina
Please, take a look.
9 years, 6 months ago (2011-06-10 14:22:25 UTC) #1
sky
LGTM http://codereview.chromium.org/7134061/diff/3001/ui/base/models/tree_node_model_unittest.cc File ui/base/models/tree_node_model_unittest.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/7134061/diff/3001/ui/base/models/tree_node_model_unittest.cc#newcode162 ui/base/models/tree_node_model_unittest.cc:162: ASSERT_TRUE(root.empty()); You should add assertions that child1 & ...
9 years, 6 months ago (2011-06-10 15:45:59 UTC) #2
tfarina
9 years, 6 months ago (2011-06-10 16:05:07 UTC) #3
http://codereview.chromium.org/7134061/diff/3001/ui/base/models/tree_node_mod...
File ui/base/models/tree_node_model_unittest.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/7134061/diff/3001/ui/base/models/tree_node_mod...
ui/base/models/tree_node_model_unittest.cc:162: ASSERT_TRUE(root.empty());
On 2011/06/10 15:45:59, sky wrote:
> You should add assertions that child1 & foo still have the expected number of
> children.

Done.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698