Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(30)

Issue 7003070: Fix bug 84783: BlobURLRequestJobTest uses URLRequest::job() (Closed)

Created:
9 years, 6 months ago by jianli
Modified:
9 years, 6 months ago
Reviewers:
wtc
CC:
chromium-reviews, darin-cc_chromium.org, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Fix bug 84783: BlobURLRequestJobTest uses URLRequest::job() BUG=84783 TEST=existing tests since no new feature Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=88446

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 1
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+1 line, -3 lines) Patch
M webkit/blob/blob_url_request_job_unittest.cc View 1 chunk +1 line, -3 lines 1 comment Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
jianli
9 years, 6 months ago (2011-06-08 22:02:59 UTC) #1
wtc
LGTM. http://codereview.chromium.org/7003070/diff/1/webkit/blob/blob_url_request_job_unittest.cc File webkit/blob/blob_url_request_job_unittest.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/7003070/diff/1/webkit/blob/blob_url_request_job_unittest.cc#newcode72 webkit/blob/blob_url_request_job_unittest.cc:72: if (!request->is_pending()) { I wonder if we should ...
9 years, 6 months ago (2011-06-08 22:16:20 UTC) #2
jianli
9 years, 6 months ago (2011-06-08 22:36:22 UTC) #3
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:16 PM, <wtc@chromium.org> wrote:

> LGTM.
>
>
> http://codereview.chromium.**org/7003070/diff/1/webkit/**
>
blob/blob_url_request_job_**unittest.cc<http://codereview.chromium.org/7003070/diff/1/webkit/blob/blob_url_request_job_unittest.cc>
> File webkit/blob/blob_url_request_**job_unittest.cc (right):
>
> http://codereview.chromium.**org/7003070/diff/1/webkit/**
>
blob/blob_url_request_job_**unittest.cc#newcode72<http://codereview.chromium.org/7003070/diff/1/webkit/blob/blob_url_request_job_unittest.cc#newcode72>
> webkit/blob/blob_url_request_**job_unittest.cc:72: if
> (!request->is_pending()) {
> I wonder if we should test !request->status().is_io_**pending()
> instead.  See lines 79-81 below.


I can't do this because URLRequest::Read has not been called at that time
and thus URLRequestStatus.status is still set to the initialized
value SUCCESS, not IO_PENDING.

>
>
>
http://codereview.chromium.**org/7003070/<http://codereview.chromium.org/7003...
>

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698