Index: presubmit_canned_checks.py |
diff --git a/presubmit_canned_checks.py b/presubmit_canned_checks.py |
index 20b9393217c35f0023d77cd648adcf834932794f..2cd3a81aa61aedf6ffd413c3ee99750960f7ffee 100644 |
--- a/presubmit_canned_checks.py |
+++ b/presubmit_canned_checks.py |
@@ -627,20 +627,20 @@ def CheckBuildbotPendingBuilds(input_api, output_api, url, max_pendings, |
def CheckOwners(input_api, output_api, source_file_filter=None): |
- affected_files = set(input_api.change.AffectedFiles(source_file_filter)) |
+ affected_files = set([f.LocalPath() for f in |
M-A Ruel
2011/03/08 22:42:16
I don't think the [] are necessary. You can remove
|
+ input_api.change.AffectedFiles(source_file_filter)]) |
owners_db = input_api.owners_db |
- if input_api.is_commiting: |
+ if input_api.is_committing: |
missing_files = owners_db.FilesNotCoveredBy(affected_files, |
input_api.change.approvers) |
if missing_files: |
return [output_api.PresubmitPromptWarning('Missing approvals for: %s' % |
','.join(missing_files))] |
return [] |
- else: |
- if not input_api.change.get('R', None): |
- suggested_reviewers = owners_db.OwnersFor(affected_files) |
+ elif input_api.change.tags.get('R'): |
+ return [] |
- # TODO(dpranke): consider getting multiple covering sets of reviewers |
- # and displaying them somehow? |
- input_api.change['R'] = ','.join(suggested_reviewers) |
+ suggested_reviewers = owners_db.ReviewersFor(affected_files) |
+ # TODO(dpranke): Actually propagate the info back. |
+ return [] |