Chromium Code Reviews| OLD | NEW |
|---|---|
| 1 # Copyright (c) 2010 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. | 1 # Copyright (c) 2010 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. |
| 2 # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be | 2 # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be |
| 3 # found in the LICENSE file. | 3 # found in the LICENSE file. |
| 4 | 4 |
| 5 """Generic presubmit checks that can be reused by other presubmit checks.""" | 5 """Generic presubmit checks that can be reused by other presubmit checks.""" |
| 6 | 6 |
| 7 ### Description checks | 7 ### Description checks |
| 8 | 8 |
| 9 def CheckChangeHasTestField(input_api, output_api): | 9 def CheckChangeHasTestField(input_api, output_api): |
| 10 """Requires that the changelist have a TEST= field.""" | 10 """Requires that the changelist have a TEST= field.""" |
| (...skipping 609 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after Loading... | |
| 620 (builder_name, pending_builds_len)) | 620 (builder_name, pending_builds_len)) |
| 621 if out: | 621 if out: |
| 622 return [output_api.PresubmitPromptWarning( | 622 return [output_api.PresubmitPromptWarning( |
| 623 'Build(s) pending. It is suggested to wait that no more than %d ' | 623 'Build(s) pending. It is suggested to wait that no more than %d ' |
| 624 'builds are pending.' % max_pendings, | 624 'builds are pending.' % max_pendings, |
| 625 long_text='\n'.join(out))] | 625 long_text='\n'.join(out))] |
| 626 return [] | 626 return [] |
| 627 | 627 |
| 628 | 628 |
| 629 def CheckOwners(input_api, output_api, source_file_filter=None): | 629 def CheckOwners(input_api, output_api, source_file_filter=None): |
| 630 affected_files = set(input_api.change.AffectedFiles(source_file_filter)) | 630 affected_files = set([f.LocalPath() for f in |
|
M-A Ruel
2011/03/08 22:42:16
I don't think the [] are necessary. You can remove
| |
| 631 input_api.change.AffectedFiles(source_file_filter)]) | |
| 631 owners_db = input_api.owners_db | 632 owners_db = input_api.owners_db |
| 632 | 633 |
| 633 if input_api.is_commiting: | 634 if input_api.is_committing: |
| 634 missing_files = owners_db.FilesNotCoveredBy(affected_files, | 635 missing_files = owners_db.FilesNotCoveredBy(affected_files, |
| 635 input_api.change.approvers) | 636 input_api.change.approvers) |
| 636 if missing_files: | 637 if missing_files: |
| 637 return [output_api.PresubmitPromptWarning('Missing approvals for: %s' % | 638 return [output_api.PresubmitPromptWarning('Missing approvals for: %s' % |
| 638 ','.join(missing_files))] | 639 ','.join(missing_files))] |
| 639 return [] | 640 return [] |
| 640 else: | 641 elif input_api.change.tags.get('R'): |
| 641 if not input_api.change.get('R', None): | 642 return [] |
| 642 suggested_reviewers = owners_db.OwnersFor(affected_files) | |
| 643 | 643 |
| 644 # TODO(dpranke): consider getting multiple covering sets of reviewers | 644 suggested_reviewers = owners_db.ReviewersFor(affected_files) |
| 645 # and displaying them somehow? | 645 # TODO(dpranke): Actually propagate the info back. |
| 646 input_api.change['R'] = ','.join(suggested_reviewers) | 646 return [] |
| OLD | NEW |