Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(198)

Issue 650167: Wireshark dissector for SPDY protocol. (Closed)

Created:
10 years, 10 months ago by cbentzel
Modified:
9 years, 7 months ago
CC:
chromium-reviews_googlegroups.com, darin-cc_chromium.org, pam+watch_chromium.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Wireshark dissector for SPDY protocol. Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=39730

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 12
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+2197 lines, --3 lines) Patch
A net/tools/spdyshark/AUTHORS View 1 chunk +2 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A net/tools/spdyshark/COPYING View 1 chunk +340 lines, -0 lines 1 comment Download
A net/tools/spdyshark/ChangeLog View 0 chunks +-1 lines, --1 lines 0 comments Download
A net/tools/spdyshark/INSTALL View 0 chunks +-1 lines, --1 lines 0 comments Download
A net/tools/spdyshark/Makefile.am View 1 chunk +126 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A net/tools/spdyshark/Makefile.common View 1 chunk +40 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A net/tools/spdyshark/Makefile.nmake View 1 chunk +104 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A net/tools/spdyshark/NEWS View 0 chunks +-1 lines, --1 lines 0 comments Download
A net/tools/spdyshark/moduleinfo.h View 1 chunk +16 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A net/tools/spdyshark/moduleinfo.nmake View 1 chunk +28 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A net/tools/spdyshark/packet-spdy.h View 1 chunk +46 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A net/tools/spdyshark/packet-spdy.c View 1 chunk +1464 lines, -0 lines 11 comments Download
A net/tools/spdyshark/plugin.rc.in View 1 chunk +34 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 8 (0 generated)
cbentzel
This is just a straight add of the existing files. I did not add build ...
10 years, 10 months ago (2010-02-22 21:23:10 UTC) #1
Eric Shienbrood
LGTM
10 years, 10 months ago (2010-02-22 21:36:54 UTC) #2
Mike Belshe
Thanks, Chris. LGTM - I am still reviewing the .c and .h, but we can ...
10 years, 10 months ago (2010-02-22 21:51:19 UTC) #3
Mike Belshe
Here are a few more comments. Maybe we should land first, then address the style ...
10 years, 10 months ago (2010-02-22 21:55:07 UTC) #4
cbentzel
I was thinking of just landing first, and then addressing issues. On Mon, Feb 22, ...
10 years, 10 months ago (2010-02-22 22:04:50 UTC) #5
Eric Shienbrood
http://codereview.chromium.org/650167/diff/1/12 File net/tools/spdyshark/packet-spdy.c (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/650167/diff/1/12#newcode278 net/tools/spdyshark/packet-spdy.c:278: if (spdy_debug) printf("Should reset SPDY decompressors\n"); On 2010/02/22 21:55:08, ...
10 years, 10 months ago (2010-02-22 23:30:32 UTC) #6
cbentzel
I think I'll just commit this tomorrow morning and then start addressing the issues. http://codereview.chromium.org/650167/diff/1/12 ...
10 years, 10 months ago (2010-02-23 02:21:58 UTC) #7
cbentzel
10 years, 10 months ago (2010-02-23 18:04:50 UTC) #8
I landed this earlier today. I'll try to find some time to address the issues
you already raised.

On 2010/02/23 02:21:58, cbentzel wrote:
> I think I'll just commit this tomorrow morning and then start addressing the
> issues.
> 
> http://codereview.chromium.org/650167/diff/1/12
> File net/tools/spdyshark/packet-spdy.c (right):
> 
> http://codereview.chromium.org/650167/diff/1/12#newcode284
> net/tools/spdyshark/packet-spdy.c:284: conversation_t  *conversation;
> On 2010/02/22 23:30:32, Eric Shienbrood wrote:
> > On 2010/02/22 21:55:08, Mike Belshe wrote:
> > > nit: conversation_t* conversation.
> > >   there are more like these. 
> > 
> > I'm not sure we should be following the Google style guide here. I tried to
> > conform to the style used in the rest of the wireshark sources. The style
> guide
> > says:
> > "When modifying code written outside Google, follow the conventions within
> that
> > code for consistency."
> 
> Agree. I think the ultimate goal is to get this integrated with wireshark
> mainline so it should follow those code conventions rather than Chrome's.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698