Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(93)

Issue 548045: Make debugger unloading deferred operation (Closed)

Created:
10 years, 11 months ago by Peter Rybin
Modified:
9 years, 7 months ago
CC:
v8-dev
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Make debugger unloading deferred operation This CL should make debugger handler setting an asynchronous operation for real. Committed: http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=3624

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : add tests #

Patch Set 3 : clean up #

Total comments: 4

Patch Set 4 : remove TODO #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+9 lines, -9 lines) Patch
M src/debug.h View 1 2 3 1 chunk +3 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M src/debug.cc View 1 2 3 1 chunk +3 lines, -8 lines 0 comments Download
M test/cctest/test-debug.cc View 2 3 1 chunk +3 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
Peter Rybin
Hi Sorren This CL has one TODO, which may be resolved before committing. I need ...
10 years, 11 months ago (2010-01-14 21:01:59 UTC) #1
Søren Thygesen Gjesse
LGTM http://codereview.chromium.org/548045/diff/8/2002 File src/debug.h (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/548045/diff/8/2002#newcode657 src/debug.h:657: // TODO(peter.rybin): should we check that we pending ...
10 years, 11 months ago (2010-01-15 08:54:51 UTC) #2
Peter Rybin
10 years, 11 months ago (2010-01-15 21:49:09 UTC) #3
http://codereview.chromium.org/548045/diff/8/2002
File src/debug.h (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/548045/diff/8/2002#newcode657
src/debug.h:657: // TODO(peter.rybin): should we check that we pending unload is
still actual?
On 2010/01/15 08:54:51, Søren Gjesse wrote:
> If you want a TODO in the source please create a bug for it and use the form
> TODO(bug).

Well, maybe I don't understand it well enough yet to create a reasonable issue.

http://codereview.chromium.org/548045/diff/8/2002#newcode659
src/debug.h:659: // Or else Debug::ClearMirrorCache() will fail in first line.
On 2010/01/15 08:54:51, Søren Gjesse wrote:
> You could add an ASSERT that the debugger is not entered.

It looks like we are going to have this assert anyway (in that method). So maybe
I'm too afraid to add more ASSERTS, that are not 100% correct.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698