crosutils: Use upstream dump_syms parameters for supporting splitdebug

crosutils: Use upstream dump_syms parameters for supporting splitdebug

Change-Id: If4eba8779496c4fb0283865da48ba38941de9c08

BUG=9281
TEST=ran without obvious errors

Committed: http://chrome-svn/viewvc/chromeos?view=rev&revision=2fb9892

[petkov, 2010-11-30 21:16:10]

So dump_syms is smart enough to distinguish between two file parameters vs.
file+directory? Either way, it seems you've tested -- LGTM

[kmixter1, 2010-11-30 22:29:10]

The upstream version only supports file+directory.  Our branch didn't
have splitdebug support and so I added it and I had the file+file
parameters.  Now that we're merged with ToT upstream, I'm removing all
our branched code and now we only pass file+directory with this
script.

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:16 PM,  <petkov@chromium.org> wrote:
> So dump_syms is smart enough to distinguish between two file parameters vs.
> file+directory? Either way, it seems you've tested -- LGTM
>
>
> http://codereview.chromium.org/5308005/
>

[kmixter1, 2010-11-30 22:39:08]

The upstream version only supports file+directory.  Our branch didn't
have splitdebug support and so I added it and I had the file+file
parameters.  Now that we're merged with ToT upstream, I'm removing all
our branched code and now we only pass file+directory with this
script.

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:16 PM,  <petkov@chromium.org> wrote:
> So dump_syms is smart enough to distinguish between two file parameters vs.
> file+directory? Either way, it seems you've tested -- LGTM
>
>
> http://codereview.chromium.org/5308005/
>

[kmixter1, 2010-12-06 19:06:39]

The upstream version only supports file+directory.  Our branch didn't
have splitdebug support and so I added it and I had the file+file
parameters.  Now I removed all our branched code and now we only pass
file+directory with this script.

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:16 PM,  <petkov@chromium.org> wrote:
> So dump_syms is smart enough to distinguish between two file parameters vs.
> file+directory? Either way, it seems you've tested -- LGTM
>
>
> http://codereview.chromium.org/5308005/
>