Change cursive/fantasy fonts in test_shell and rebaseline test results accordingly

Change the web preferences for cursive and fantasy from 'Apple Chancery' and 'Papyrus' to 
'Comic Sans MS' and 'Impact' in test_shell.cc
They're selected not because they're the best for cursive and fantasy but because they come with Windows 
without MS Office or other programs installed. 

Papyrus ('fantasy') and Script (a good candidate for 'cursive') are only 
available with MS Office installed. 'Apple Chancery' is not available on Windows and our expected results were bogus
(they're just using the default font).

Rebaseline tests affected by this change (any test that refers to 'cursive' or 'fantasy' fonts). 

Remove papyrus.html and apple-chancery.html and add 'comic-sans-ms.html' and 'impact.html' from chrome/font

Remove *-expected.txt from layout_test_results/v8/chrome/fonts/* and put them along with html files 
in layout_tests/chrome/fonts

Adjust tests_fixable.txt accordingly. 

BUG=2303
TEST=pass layout tests


Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=2883

[eroman, 2008-09-29 23:56:32]

lgtm.

Looping in eseidel, in case it will be easier for webkit-merge effort to submit
this now, or sit on it until it lands tomorrow.

Rubber stamp with respect to the  *-expected.* files.

http://codereview.chromium.org/4341/diff/1/201
File webkit/tools/test_shell/test_shell.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/4341/diff/1/201#newcode239
Line 239: // enumerating all the fonts available on Windows XP. Some of
Are these solid choices for Vista as well?

[macdome_gmail.com, 2008-09-30 00:01:48]

Probably easier to deal with this tomorrow, after we land...  Evan and tony have
been doing our merging with trunk.

-eric

[tony, 2008-09-30 00:06:55]

I was going to say the same thing.  Please wait until after the merge lands
tomorrow since it'll probably have to be done again.

On 2008/09/30 00:01:48, Eric Seidel wrote:
> Probably easier to deal with this tomorrow, after we land...  Evan and tony
have
> been doing our merging with trunk.
> 
> -eric

[Pam (message me for reviews), 2008-09-30 00:15:44]

LGTM, with the caveats already noted by others.

These expected results files aren't in exactly the customary places, but since
I'm planning to reorganize all that later this week, as long as the tests pass
it's fine.

[jungshik at Google, 2008-10-03 00:40:08]

Thank you all for taking a look. I'll land when the tree is open again. 

On 2008/09/30 00:15:44, Pam wrote:
> LGTM, with the caveats already noted by others.
> 
> These expected results files aren't in exactly the customary places, but since
> I'm planning to reorganize all that later this week, as long as the tests pass
> it's fine.

[jungshik at Google, 2008-10-03 00:40:29]

http://codereview.chromium.org/4341/diff/1/201
File webkit/tools/test_shell/test_shell.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/4341/diff/1/201#newcode239
Line 239: // enumerating all the fonts available on Windows XP. Some of
On 2008/09/29 23:56:32, eroman wrote:
> Are these solid choices for Vista as well?

Yes, they're in the sense that both are available on Vista as well as XP. I
changed the comment to refer to the Vista font list as well.