Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(208)

Issue 354002: Sixth patch in getting rid of caching MessageLoop pointers. Audio and automa... (Closed)

Created:
11 years, 1 month ago by jam
Modified:
9 years, 7 months ago
Reviewers:
Alpha Left Google
CC:
chromium-reviews_googlegroups.com, brettw+cc_chromium.org, darin (slow to review), ben+cc_chromium.org, jam, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Sixth patch in getting rid of caching MessageLoop pointers. BUG=25354 Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=30737

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : '' #

Patch Set 3 : '' #

Patch Set 4 : '' #

Patch Set 5 : '' #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+56 lines, -62 lines) Patch
M chrome/browser/automation/automation_resource_message_filter.h View 2 chunks +0 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M chrome/browser/automation/automation_resource_message_filter.cc View 7 chunks +14 lines, -14 lines 0 comments Download
M chrome/browser/renderer_host/audio_renderer_host.h View 1 2 3 4 chunks +1 line, -6 lines 0 comments Download
M chrome/browser/renderer_host/audio_renderer_host.cc View 1 2 3 17 chunks +30 lines, -33 lines 0 comments Download
M chrome/browser/renderer_host/audio_renderer_host_unittest.cc View 4 5 chunks +10 lines, -5 lines 0 comments Download
M chrome/browser/renderer_host/browser_render_process_host.cc View 1 chunk +1 line, -2 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
jam
11 years, 1 month ago (2009-11-02 18:31:50 UTC) #1
Alpha Left Google
LGTM. One question, what is the intention of removing reference to MessageLoop? Is it that ...
11 years, 1 month ago (2009-11-02 18:52:40 UTC) #2
jam
11 years, 1 month ago (2009-11-02 19:01:08 UTC) #3
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:52 AM, <hclam@chromium.org> wrote:

> LGTM.
>
> One question, what is the intention of removing reference to MessageLoop?
> Is it
> that we shouldn't be using MessageLoop directly?


Correct.  I'm sending out an email today to chromium-dev with the nitty
gritty details (perhaps I should have sent it first!).

>
>
> http://codereview.chromium.org/354002
>

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698