Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(542)

Unified Diff: binutils/gold/output.cc

Issue 3018030: [binutils] Bump binutils to 2.20.1 (Closed) Base URL: ssh://git@gitrw.chromium.org:9222/nacl-toolchain.git
Patch Set: Created 10 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « binutils/gold/output.h ('k') | binutils/gold/po/Make-in » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: binutils/gold/output.cc
diff --git a/binutils/gold/output.cc b/binutils/gold/output.cc
index e2d758520c28e29e07dd48d48a22f7860f20da27..84f59ae819467ae7135a577ce9b5ce8c28f31d39 100644
--- a/binutils/gold/output.cc
+++ b/binutils/gold/output.cc
@@ -1800,13 +1800,15 @@ Output_section::Output_section(const char* name, elfcpp::Elf_Word type,
is_relro_local_(false),
is_small_section_(false),
is_large_section_(false),
+ is_interp_(false),
+ is_dynamic_linker_section_(false),
+ generate_code_fills_at_write_(false),
tls_offset_(0),
checkpoint_(NULL),
merge_section_map_(),
merge_section_by_properties_map_(),
relaxed_input_section_map_(),
- is_relaxed_input_section_map_valid_(true),
- generate_code_fills_at_write_(false)
+ is_relaxed_input_section_map_valid_(true)
{
// An unallocated section has no address. Forcing this means that
// we don't need special treatment for symbols defined in debug
@@ -3045,11 +3047,13 @@ Output_segment::Output_segment(elfcpp::Elf_Word type, elfcpp::Elf_Word flags)
void
Output_segment::add_output_section(Output_section* os,
- elfcpp::Elf_Word seg_flags)
+ elfcpp::Elf_Word seg_flags,
+ bool do_sort)
{
gold_assert((os->flags() & elfcpp::SHF_ALLOC) != 0);
gold_assert(!this->is_max_align_known_);
gold_assert(os->is_large_data_section() == this->is_large_data_segment());
+ gold_assert(this->type() == elfcpp::PT_LOAD || !do_sort);
// Update the segment flags.
this->flags_ |= seg_flags;
@@ -3060,19 +3064,12 @@ Output_segment::add_output_section(Output_section* os,
else
pdl = &this->output_data_;
- // So that PT_NOTE segments will work correctly, we need to ensure
- // that all SHT_NOTE sections are adjacent. This will normally
- // happen automatically, because all the SHT_NOTE input sections
- // will wind up in the same output section. However, it is possible
- // for multiple SHT_NOTE input sections to have different section
- // flags, and thus be in different output sections, but for the
- // different section flags to map into the same segment flags and
- // thus the same output segment.
-
// Note that while there may be many input sections in an output
// section, there are normally only a few output sections in an
- // output segment. This loop is expected to be fast.
+ // output segment. The loops below are expected to be fast.
+ // So that PT_NOTE segments will work correctly, we need to ensure
+ // that all SHT_NOTE sections are adjacent.
if (os->type() == elfcpp::SHT_NOTE && !pdl->empty())
{
Output_segment::Output_data_list::iterator p = pdl->end();
@@ -3094,8 +3091,8 @@ Output_segment::add_output_section(Output_section* os,
// case: we group the SHF_TLS/SHT_NOBITS sections right after the
// SHF_TLS/SHT_PROGBITS sections. This lets us set up PT_TLS
// correctly. SHF_TLS sections get added to both a PT_LOAD segment
- // and the PT_TLS segment -- we do this grouping only for the
- // PT_LOAD segment.
+ // and the PT_TLS segment; we do this grouping only for the PT_LOAD
+ // segment.
if (this->type_ != elfcpp::PT_TLS
&& (os->flags() & elfcpp::SHF_TLS) != 0)
{
@@ -3225,6 +3222,68 @@ Output_segment::add_output_section(Output_section* os,
gold_unreachable();
}
+ // We do some further output section sorting in order to make the
+ // generated program run more efficiently. We should only do this
+ // when not using a linker script, so it is controled by the DO_SORT
+ // parameter.
+ if (do_sort)
+ {
+ // FreeBSD requires the .interp section to be in the first page
+ // of the executable. That is a more efficient location anyhow
+ // for any OS, since it means that the kernel will have the data
+ // handy after it reads the program headers.
+ if (os->is_interp() && !pdl->empty())
+ {
+ pdl->insert(pdl->begin(), os);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Put loadable non-writable notes immediately after the .interp
+ // sections, so that the PT_NOTE segment is on the first page of
+ // the executable.
+ if (os->type() == elfcpp::SHT_NOTE
+ && (os->flags() & elfcpp::SHF_WRITE) == 0
+ && !pdl->empty())
+ {
+ Output_segment::Output_data_list::iterator p = pdl->begin();
+ if ((*p)->is_section() && (*p)->output_section()->is_interp())
+ ++p;
+ pdl->insert(p, os);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // If this section is used by the dynamic linker, and it is not
+ // writable, then put it first, after the .interp section and
+ // any loadable notes. This makes it more likely that the
+ // dynamic linker will have to read less data from the disk.
+ if (os->is_dynamic_linker_section()
+ && !pdl->empty()
+ && (os->flags() & elfcpp::SHF_WRITE) == 0)
+ {
+ bool is_reloc = (os->type() == elfcpp::SHT_REL
+ || os->type() == elfcpp::SHT_RELA);
+ Output_segment::Output_data_list::iterator p = pdl->begin();
+ while (p != pdl->end()
+ && (*p)->is_section()
+ && ((*p)->output_section()->is_dynamic_linker_section()
+ || (*p)->output_section()->type() == elfcpp::SHT_NOTE))
+ {
+ // Put reloc sections after the other ones. Putting the
+ // dynamic reloc sections first confuses BFD, notably
+ // objcopy and strip.
+ if (!is_reloc
+ && ((*p)->output_section()->type() == elfcpp::SHT_REL
+ || (*p)->output_section()->type() == elfcpp::SHT_RELA))
+ break;
+ ++p;
+ }
+ pdl->insert(p, os);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // If there were no constraints on the output section, just add it
+ // to the end of the list.
pdl->push_back(os);
}
@@ -3503,15 +3562,20 @@ Output_segment::set_section_list_addresses(const Layout* layout, bool reset,
else
{
Output_section* os = (*p)->output_section();
+
+ // Cast to unsigned long long to avoid format warnings.
+ unsigned long long previous_dot =
+ static_cast<unsigned long long>(addr + (off - startoff));
+ unsigned long long dot =
+ static_cast<unsigned long long>((*p)->address());
+
if (os == NULL)
gold_error(_("dot moves backward in linker script "
- "from 0x%llx to 0x%llx"),
- addr + (off - startoff), (*p)->address());
+ "from 0x%llx to 0x%llx"), previous_dot, dot);
else
gold_error(_("address of section '%s' moves backward "
"from 0x%llx to 0x%llx"),
- os->name(), addr + (off - startoff),
- (*p)->address());
+ os->name(), previous_dot, dot);
}
}
(*p)->set_file_offset(off);
« no previous file with comments | « binutils/gold/output.h ('k') | binutils/gold/po/Make-in » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698