Issue 2152003: Moved selection of I915 hack out of the YUV shader.

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Issue 2152003: Moved selection of I915 hack out of the YUV shader. (Closed)

Created:
10 years, 7 months ago by Alexey Marinichev

Modified:
9 years, 7 months ago

Reviewers:
piman

CC:
chromium-os-reviews_chromium.org, sosa+cc_chromium.org, seano, ericli, petkov+cc_chromium.org

Base URL:
ssh://git@chromiumos-git//autotest.git

Visibility:
Public.

Moved selection of I915 hack out of the YUV shader.

Created: 10 years, 7 months ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

	Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Stats (+30 lines, -16 lines)			Patch
M	client/deps/glbench/src/utils.h	View	1 chunk	+3 lines, -0 lines	0 comments	Download
M	client/deps/glbench/src/utils.cc	View	1 chunk	+14 lines, -2 lines	0 comments	Download
M	client/deps/glbench/src/yuv2rgb_1.glslf	View	3 chunks	+2 lines, -3 lines	0 comments	Download
M	client/deps/glbench/src/yuv2rgb_1.glslv	View	1 chunk	+1 line, -3 lines	0 comments	Download
M	client/deps/glbench/src/yuv2rgb_2.glslf	View	3 chunks	+2 lines, -4 lines	0 comments	Download
M	client/deps/glbench/src/yuv2rgb_2.glslv	View	2 chunks	+1 line, -3 lines	0 comments	Download
M	client/deps/glbench/src/yuvtest.cc	View	1 chunk	+7 lines, -1 line	0 comments	Download

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)

Alexey Marinichev

10 years, 7 months ago (2010-05-24 23:14:39 UTC) #3

On 2010/05/24 23:11:24, piman wrote:
> LGTM. Thanks !

Why, thank you!