Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(185)

Unified Diff: sync/syncable/syncable_unittest.cc

Issue 10389103: Sync: Clear IS_UNSYNCED for deleted local items (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Created 8 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« sync/syncable/syncable.cc ('K') | « sync/syncable/syncable.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: sync/syncable/syncable_unittest.cc
diff --git a/sync/syncable/syncable_unittest.cc b/sync/syncable/syncable_unittest.cc
index c4f87017cde2fd112ca0c69fe665c710c753ba56..d2ab5950f0c8daffff1e075d776002d6cdfc2b3f 100644
--- a/sync/syncable/syncable_unittest.cc
+++ b/sync/syncable/syncable_unittest.cc
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include "base/threading/platform_thread.h"
#include "base/values.h"
#include "sync/engine/syncproto.h"
+#include "sync/engine/syncer_util.h"
rlarocque 2012/05/11 22:41:26 I'm not sure if it's OK to test syncer_util functi
#include "sync/util/test_unrecoverable_error_handler.h"
#include "sync/syncable/directory_backing_store.h"
#include "sync/syncable/directory_change_delegate.h"
@@ -429,7 +430,8 @@ class SyncableDirectoryTest : public testing::Test {
}
virtual void TearDown() {
- dir_->SaveChanges();
+ if (dir_.get())
+ dir_->SaveChanges();
dir_.reset();
}
@@ -508,6 +510,15 @@ class SyncableDirectoryTest : public testing::Test {
int64 base_version,
int64 server_version,
bool is_del);
+
+ // When a directory is saved then loaded from disk, it will pass through
+ // DropDeletedEntries(). This will remove some entries from the directory.
+ // This function is intended to simulate that process.
+ //
+ // WARNING: The directory will be deleted by this operation. You should
+ // not have any pointers to the directory (open transactions included)
+ // when you call this.
+ DirOpenResult SimulateSaveAndReloadDir();
};
TEST_F(SyncableDirectoryTest, TakeSnapshotGetsMetahandlesToPurge) {
@@ -1154,6 +1165,105 @@ TEST_F(SyncableDirectoryTest, GetModelType) {
}
}
+// A test that roughly mimics the directory interaction that occurs when a
+// bookmark folder and entry are created then synced for the first time. It is
+// a more common variant of the 'DeletedAndUnsyncedChild' scenario tested below.
Nicolas Zea 2012/05/11 23:21:25 DeleteAndUnsyncedChild -> DeleteAnUnsyncedChild? (
rlarocque 2012/05/15 00:41:55 It's DeletedAndUnsyncedChild.
+TEST_F(SyncableDirectoryTest, ChangeEntryIDAndUpdateChildren_ParentAndChild) {
+ TestIdFactory id_factory;
+ Id orig_parent_id;
+ Id orig_child_id;
+
+ {
+ // Create two client-side items, a parent and child.
+ WriteTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, UNITTEST, dir_.get());
+
+ MutableEntry parent(&trans, CREATE, id_factory.root(), "parent");
+ parent.Put(IS_DIR, true);
+ parent.Put(IS_UNSYNCED, true);
+
+ MutableEntry child(&trans, CREATE, parent.Get(ID), "child");
+ child.Put(IS_UNSYNCED, true);
+
+ orig_parent_id = parent.Get(ID);
+ orig_child_id = child.Get(ID);
+ }
+
+ {
+ // Simulate what happens after committing two items. Their IDs will be
+ // replaced with server IDs. The child is renamed first, then the parent.
+ WriteTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, UNITTEST, dir_.get());
+
+ MutableEntry parent(&trans, GET_BY_ID, orig_parent_id);
+ MutableEntry child(&trans, GET_BY_ID, orig_child_id);
+
+ browser_sync::SyncerUtil::ChangeEntryIDAndUpdateChildren(
+ &trans, &child, id_factory.NewServerId());
+ child.Put(IS_UNSYNCED, false);
+ child.Put(BASE_VERSION, 1);
+ child.Put(SERVER_VERSION, 1);
+
+ browser_sync::SyncerUtil::ChangeEntryIDAndUpdateChildren(
+ &trans, &parent, id_factory.NewServerId());
+ parent.Put(IS_UNSYNCED, false);
+ parent.Put(BASE_VERSION, 1);
+ parent.Put(SERVER_VERSION, 1);
+ }
+
+ // Final check of validity.
Nicolas Zea 2012/05/11 23:21:25 of -> for
rlarocque 2012/05/15 00:41:55 Done.
+ EXPECT_EQ(OPENED, SimulateSaveAndReloadDir());
+}
+
+// A test based on the scenario where we create a bookmark folder and entry
+// locally, but with a twist. In this case, the bookmark is deleted before we
+// are abot to sync either it or its parent folder. This scenario used to cause
Nicolas Zea 2012/05/11 23:21:25 abot -> able
rlarocque 2012/05/15 00:41:55 Done.
+// directory corruption, see crbug.com/125381.
+TEST_F(SyncableDirectoryTest,
+ ChangeEntryIDAndUpdateChildren_DeletedAndUnsyncedChild) {
+ TestIdFactory id_factory;
+ Id orig_parent_id;
+ Id orig_child_id;
+
+ {
+ // Create two client-side items, a parent and child.
+ WriteTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, UNITTEST, dir_.get());
+
+ MutableEntry parent(&trans, CREATE, id_factory.root(), "parent");
+ parent.Put(IS_DIR, true);
+ parent.Put(IS_UNSYNCED, true);
+
+ MutableEntry child(&trans, CREATE, parent.Get(ID), "child");
+ child.Put(IS_UNSYNCED, true);
+
+ orig_parent_id = parent.Get(ID);
+ orig_child_id = child.Get(ID);
+ }
+
+ {
+ // Delete the child.
+ WriteTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, UNITTEST, dir_.get());
+
+ MutableEntry child(&trans, GET_BY_ID, orig_child_id);
+ child.Put(IS_DEL, true);
+ }
+
+ {
+ // Simulate what happens after committing the parent. Its ID will be
+ // replaced with server a ID.
+ WriteTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, UNITTEST, dir_.get());
+
+ MutableEntry parent(&trans, GET_BY_ID, orig_parent_id);
+
+ browser_sync::SyncerUtil::ChangeEntryIDAndUpdateChildren(
+ &trans, &parent, id_factory.NewServerId());
+ parent.Put(IS_UNSYNCED, false);
+ parent.Put(BASE_VERSION, 1);
+ parent.Put(SERVER_VERSION, 1);
+ }
+
+ // Final check of validity.
Nicolas Zea 2012/05/11 23:21:25 of -> for
rlarocque 2012/05/15 00:41:55 Done.
rlarocque 2012/05/15 00:41:55 Done.
+ EXPECT_EQ(OPENED, SimulateSaveAndReloadDir());
+}
+
// A variant of SyncableDirectoryTest that uses a real sqlite database.
class OnDiskSyncableDirectoryTest : public SyncableDirectoryTest {
protected:
@@ -1536,6 +1646,32 @@ void SyncableDirectoryTest::ValidateEntry(BaseTransaction* trans,
ASSERT_TRUE(is_del == e.Get(IS_DEL));
}
+DirOpenResult SyncableDirectoryTest::SimulateSaveAndReloadDir() {
+ if (!dir_->SaveChanges())
+ return FAILED_IN_UNITTEST;
+
+ // Do some tricky things to preserve the backing store.
+ DirectoryBackingStore* saved_store = dir_->store_;
+ dir_->store_ = NULL;
+
+ // Close the current directory.
+ dir_->Close();
+ dir_.reset();
+
+ dir_.reset(new Directory(&encryptor_, &handler_, NULL));
+ if (!dir_.get())
+ return FAILED_IN_UNITTEST;
+ DirOpenResult result = dir_->OpenImpl(saved_store, kName, &delegate_,
+ NullTransactionObserver());
+
+ // If something went wrong, we to clear this member. If we don't, TearDown()
Nicolas Zea 2012/05/11 23:21:25 we to -> we need to
rlarocque 2012/05/15 00:41:55 Done.
+ // will be guaranteed to crash when it calls SaveChanges().
+ if (result != OPENED)
+ dir_.reset();
+
+ return result;
+}
+
namespace {
class SyncableDirectoryManagement : public testing::Test {
« sync/syncable/syncable.cc ('K') | « sync/syncable/syncable.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698