Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(657)

Unified Diff: sync/protocol/prepare_protos_for_java_tests.py

Issue 998373004: Sync: Generalize entity injection in Android tests (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 5 years, 8 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: sync/protocol/prepare_protos_for_java_tests.py
diff --git a/sync/protocol/prepare_protos_for_java_tests.py b/sync/protocol/prepare_protos_for_java_tests.py
new file mode 100755
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0db4b9dc11625b6ed372935a66118925a8c4e9b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sync/protocol/prepare_protos_for_java_tests.py
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+# Copyright 2015 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+# Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+# found in the LICENSE file.
+
+"""Converts protocol buffer definitions to ones supported by the Nano library.
+
+Note: Java files generated from the output of this script should only be used
+in tests.
+
+Chromium uses the Java Protocol Buffers Nano runtime library. This library,
+compared to the standard proto compilter in C++, is limited. Most notably, the
+retain_unknown_fields option is not supported.
+
+This script also adds Java-specific configs to enable usage in Java. This script
+is Sync-specific, so a Sync package name is used.
+"""
+
+import optparse
+import os
+import re
+import sys
+
+
+def main():
+ parser = optparse.OptionParser(
+ usage='Usage: %prog [options...] original_proto_files')
+ parser.add_option('-o', '--output_dir', dest='output_dir',
+ help='Where to put the modified proto files')
+
+ options, args = parser.parse_args()
+ if not options.output_dir:
+ print 'output_dir not specified.'
+ return 1
+
+ # Map of original base file names to their contents.
+ original_proto_contents = {}
+ for original_proto_file in args:
+ with open(original_proto_file, 'r') as original_file:
+ base_name = os.path.basename(original_proto_file)
+ original_proto_contents[base_name] = original_file.read()
+
+ for file_name, original_contents in original_proto_contents.iteritems():
+ new_contents = ConvertProtoFileContents(original_contents)
+ with open(os.path.join(options.output_dir, file_name), 'w') as new_file:
+ new_file.write(new_contents)
+
+
+def ConvertProtoFileContents(contents):
Nicolas Zea 2015/04/09 20:38:16 I wonder if we should have a test for this? Althou
pval...(no longer on Chromium) 2015/04/09 21:28:05 Yes, compilation would fail. However, that's no gu
Nicolas Zea 2015/04/09 21:40:42 As long as compile would fail I think we're fine (
+ """Returns a Nano-compatible version of contents.
+
+ Args:
+ contents: The contents of a protocol buffer definition file.
+ """
+ # Remove the retain_unknown_fields option.
+ incompatible_option_regex = re.compile(
+ r'^\s*option\s+retain_unknown_fields\s*=.*;', re.MULTILINE)
+ pruned_contents = incompatible_option_regex.sub('', contents)
+
+ # Add the java_multiple_files and java_package options. Options must be set
+ # after the syntax declaration, so look for the declaration and place the
+ # options immediately after it.
+ # TODO(pvalenzuela): Set Java options via proto compiler flags instead of
+ # modifying the files here.
+ syntax_regex = re.compile(r'^\s*syntax\s*=.*;', re.MULTILINE)
+ syntax_end = syntax_regex.search(pruned_contents).end()
+ java_options = ('option java_multiple_files = true; '
+ 'option java_package = "org.chromium.sync.protocol";')
+
+ contents_to_join = (pruned_contents[:syntax_end], java_options,
+ pruned_contents[syntax_end:])
+ return ''.join(contents_to_join)
+
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+ sys.exit(main())

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698