Index: content/renderer/scheduler/deadline_task_runner.cc |
diff --git a/content/renderer/scheduler/deadline_task_runner.cc b/content/renderer/scheduler/deadline_task_runner.cc |
new file mode 100644 |
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3ad3bc9aed09f916017bea0c3fd6586ef7a6146d |
--- /dev/null |
+++ b/content/renderer/scheduler/deadline_task_runner.cc |
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ |
+// Copyright 2015 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. |
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be |
+// found in the LICENSE file. |
+ |
+#include "content/renderer/scheduler/deadline_task_runner.h" |
+ |
+#include "base/bind.h" |
+ |
+namespace content { |
+ |
+DeadlineTaskRunner::DeadlineTaskRunner( |
+ const base::Closure& callback, |
+ scoped_refptr<base::SingleThreadTaskRunner> task_runner) |
+ : callback_(callback), task_runner_(task_runner), weak_factory_(this) { |
+ InitializeRunInternal(); |
+} |
+ |
+DeadlineTaskRunner::~DeadlineTaskRunner() { |
+} |
+ |
+void DeadlineTaskRunner::SetDeadline(const tracked_objects::Location& from_here, |
+ base::TimeTicks deadline, |
+ base::TimeTicks now) { |
+ DCHECK(deadline > now); |
+ if (deadline_ != base::TimeTicks()) { |
+ if (deadline >= deadline_) |
+ return; |
rmcilroy
2015/03/12 15:45:30
This might be clearer with a non-nested early out
alex clarke (OOO till 29th)
2015/03/12 17:01:49
Unfortunately that will always early out if we use
|
+ |
+ Cancel(); |
+ } |
+ deadline_ = deadline; |
+ task_runner_->PostDelayedTask(from_here, run_internal_, deadline - now); |
+} |
+ |
+void DeadlineTaskRunner::RunInternal() { |
+ deadline_ = base::TimeTicks(); |
+ callback_.Run(); |
+} |
+ |
+void DeadlineTaskRunner::Cancel() { |
+ weak_factory_.InvalidateWeakPtrs(); |
+ InitializeRunInternal(); |
+} |
+ |
+void DeadlineTaskRunner::InitializeRunInternal() { |
+ run_internal_ = |
+ base::Bind(&DeadlineTaskRunner::RunInternal, weak_factory_.GetWeakPtr()); |
rmcilroy
2015/03/12 15:45:30
Just use a CancelableClosureHolder for the interna
alex clarke (OOO till 29th)
2015/03/12 17:01:49
I thought about doing it that way but I think we'd
|
+} |
+ |
+} // namespace content |