JS cleanup for cr_elements

ui/webui/resources/cr_elements/cr_network_icon/cr_network_icon.js

Index: ui/webui/resources/cr_elements/cr_network_icon/cr_network_icon.js
diff --git a/ui/webui/resources/cr_elements/cr_network_icon/cr_network_icon.js b/ui/webui/resources/cr_elements/cr_network_icon/cr_network_icon.js
index c70079ee6425fef542a6c05b74f4d369b80f8163..6a204d1267a8c7b118fc00c87dd5ccab4aa80ef5 100644
--- a/ui/webui/resources/cr_elements/cr_network_icon/cr_network_icon.js
+++ b/ui/webui/resources/cr_elements/cr_network_icon/cr_network_icon.js
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
 // found in the LICENSE file.
 
 /**
- * @fileoverview Polymer element for rendering network icons based on ONC
- * state properties.
+ * @fileoverview
+ * Polymer element for rendering network icons based on ONC state properties.

[stevenjb, 2015/03/06 17:39:15]

I see way more examples of comments starting on the same line as @fileoverview.
In fact, the example here does so:
http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/javascriptguide.xml

I don't see any problem with this styling, but let's not enforce it or even
suggest that it is preferred in a styling CL.

[michaelpg, 2015/03/06 18:24:09]

You're right, thanks!

  */
 
 (function() {
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ function getIconTypeFromNetworkType(networkType) {
 }
 
 /**
- * Polymer class definition for 'cr-network-icon'.
+ * Polymer class definition for `cr-network-icon`.
  * @element cr-network-icon
  */
 Polymer('cr-network-icon', {