Revert of adding baseline options for super/sub scripting

Revert of adding baseline options for super/sub scripting (patchset #20 id:420001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/924543004/)

Reason for revert:
Windows XP appears to be drawing outside of the expected draw area for a font.

The short term fix will be to disable the test for Windows XP and put in a TODO to look into it.

Original issue's description:
> adding baseline options for super/sub scripting
> 
> This change list adds four options for a smaller font to be used as a style within the render text.
> 
>   Option           Example
>   ------           -------
>   SUPERSCRIPT      a mathematical exponent would be superscript
>   SUPERIOR         8th, the "th" would be superior script
>   INFERIOR         1/2, the "2" would be inferior ("1" is superior)
>   SUBSCRIPT        H2O, the "2" would be subscript
> 
> Some imagination is needed to interpret the examples above.  To see a clearer references to what is meant, this wikipedia article may be helpful: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subscript_and_superscript
> 
> These options may be set in the same way options like BOLD and ITALIC can currently be set, e.g. with a call to my_render_text->ApplyStyle(gfx::SUPERSCRIPT, true, gfx::Range(1, 3));
> 
> BUG=459812
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/eefeef59e4b44727e735e99733799a489b8a6efa
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#319492}

TBR=mukai@chromium.org,dgrogan@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=459812

[dschuyler, 2015-03-07 00:44:53]

Created Revert of adding baseline options for super/sub scripting

[dschuyler, 2015-03-07 00:45:45]

dschuyler@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ msw@chromium.org
- mukai@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-03-07 00:45:53]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/985923002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-03-07 00:45:54]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-03-07 00:45:55]

No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
_not_ a full super star committer.
See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.

[Jun Mukai, 2015-03-07 01:12:49]

On 2015/03/07 at 00:45:55, commit-bot wrote:
> No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
> Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
> _not_ a full super star committer.
> See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
> Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.

Be careful this will conflict with my CL
https://codereview.chromium.org/968923004
I already rebased my CL and now it's in CQ.
What should I do?  Should I wait for your revert or can I make a progress?

[chromium-reviews, 2015-03-07 01:14:03]

I'm testing a fix in https://codereview.chromium.org/988763005/
So if that's done soon, maybe that will help.

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:12 PM, <mukai@chromium.org> wrote:

> On 2015/03/07 at 00:45:55, commit-bot wrote:
>
>> No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
>> Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
>> _not_ a full super star committer.
>> See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
>> Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.
>>
>
> Be careful this will conflict with my CL
> https://codereview.chromium.org/968923004
> I already rebased my CL and now it's in CQ.
> What should I do?  Should I wait for your revert or can I make a progress?
>
> https://codereview.chromium.org/985923002/
>

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.

[dschuyler, 2015-03-07 02:17:44]

On 2015/03/07 01:14:03, chromium-reviews wrote:
> I'm testing a fix in https://codereview.chromium.org/988763005/
> So if that's done soon, maybe that will help.
> 
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:12 PM, <mailto:mukai@chromium.org> wrote:
> 
> > On 2015/03/07 at 00:45:55, commit-bot wrote:
> >
> >> No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
> >> Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
> >> _not_ a full super star committer.
> >> See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
> >> Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.
> >>
> >
> > Be careful this will conflict with my CL
> > https://codereview.chromium.org/968923004
> > I already rebased my CL and now it's in CQ.
> > What should I do?  Should I wait for your revert or can I make a progress?
> >
> > https://codereview.chromium.org/985923002/
> >
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email
> to mailto:chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.

With the LGTM from MSW on https://codereview.chromium.org/988763005/, I think it
would be correct to  not check this in.

[dschuyler, 2015-03-07 02:22:09]

On 2015/03/07 02:17:44, dschuyler wrote:
> On 2015/03/07 01:14:03, chromium-reviews wrote:
> > I'm testing a fix in https://codereview.chromium.org/988763005/
> > So if that's done soon, maybe that will help.
> > 
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:12 PM, <mailto:mukai@chromium.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On 2015/03/07 at 00:45:55, commit-bot wrote:
> > >
> > >> No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
> > >> Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
> > >> _not_ a full super star committer.
> > >> See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
> > >> Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Be careful this will conflict with my CL
> > > https://codereview.chromium.org/968923004
> > > I already rebased my CL and now it's in CQ.
> > > What should I do?  Should I wait for your revert or can I make a progress?
> > >
> > > https://codereview.chromium.org/985923002/
> > >
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email
> > to mailto:chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.
> 
> With the LGTM from MSW on https://codereview.chromium.org/988763005/, I think
it
> would be correct to  not check this in.

With the NOT LGTM from MUKAI on https://codereview.chromium.org/988763005/, it
sounds like this revert should proceed.

[Jun Mukai, 2015-03-07 02:31:32]

On 2015/03/07 02:22:09, dschuyler wrote:
> On 2015/03/07 02:17:44, dschuyler wrote:
> > On 2015/03/07 01:14:03, chromium-reviews wrote:
> > > I'm testing a fix in https://codereview.chromium.org/988763005/
> > > So if that's done soon, maybe that will help.
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:12 PM, <mailto:mukai@chromium.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On 2015/03/07 at 00:45:55, commit-bot wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
> > > >> Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
> > > >> _not_ a full super star committer.
> > > >> See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
> > > >> Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Be careful this will conflict with my CL
> > > > https://codereview.chromium.org/968923004
> > > > I already rebased my CL and now it's in CQ.
> > > > What should I do?  Should I wait for your revert or can I make a
progress?
> > > >
> > > > https://codereview.chromium.org/985923002/
> > > >
> > > 
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email
> > > to mailto:chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.
> > 
> > With the LGTM from MSW on https://codereview.chromium.org/988763005/, I
think
> it
> > would be correct to  not check this in.
> 
> With the NOT LGTM from MUKAI on https://codereview.chromium.org/988763005/, it
> sounds like this revert should proceed.

I believe so.  If you don't have a committer access, I can revert on behalf.

[chromium-reviews, 2015-03-07 02:37:35]

I'm quite new, so I'll need an LGTM to commit the revert (I believe).

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:31 PM, <mukai@chromium.org> wrote:

> On 2015/03/07 02:22:09, dschuyler wrote:
>
>> On 2015/03/07 02:17:44, dschuyler wrote:
>> > On 2015/03/07 01:14:03, chromium-reviews wrote:
>> > > I'm testing a fix in https://codereview.chromium.org/988763005/
>> > > So if that's done soon, maybe that will help.
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:12 PM, <mailto:mukai@chromium.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On 2015/03/07 at 00:45:55, commit-bot wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are
>> accepted.
>> > > >> Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a
>> non-committer,
>> > > >> _not_ a full super star committer.
>> > > >> See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
>> > > >> Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > > Be careful this will conflict with my CL
>> > > > https://codereview.chromium.org/968923004
>> > > > I already rebased my CL and now it's in CQ.
>> > > > What should I do?  Should I wait for your revert or can I make a
>>
> progress?
>
>> > > >
>> > > > https://codereview.chromium.org/985923002/
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> send an
>> > email
>> > > to mailto:chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.
>> >
>> > With the LGTM from MSW on https://codereview.chromium.org/988763005/, I
>>
> think
>
>> it
>> > would be correct to  not check this in.
>>
>
>  With the NOT LGTM from MUKAI on https://codereview.chromium.
>> org/988763005/, it
>> sounds like this revert should proceed.
>>
>
> I believe so.  If you don't have a committer access, I can revert on
> behalf.
>
> https://codereview.chromium.org/985923002/
>

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.