Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(106)

Unified Diff: ui/compositor/layer_owner_unittest.cc

Issue 983933002: Reset the root layer on the compositor when recreating a root layer. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Optimized 'is root layer' check. Created 5 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « ui/compositor/layer_owner.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: ui/compositor/layer_owner_unittest.cc
diff --git a/ui/compositor/layer_owner_unittest.cc b/ui/compositor/layer_owner_unittest.cc
index 6390ecaf4633f026c409573114a6defb216f003e..af3a83ef727b0408c59f25ef1a69158054236394 100644
--- a/ui/compositor/layer_owner_unittest.cc
+++ b/ui/compositor/layer_owner_unittest.cc
@@ -4,10 +4,14 @@
#include "ui/compositor/layer_owner.h"
+#include "base/test/null_task_runner.h"
#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+#include "ui/compositor/compositor.h"
#include "ui/compositor/layer.h"
#include "ui/compositor/layer_animator.h"
#include "ui/compositor/scoped_layer_animation_settings.h"
+#include "ui/compositor/test/context_factories_for_test.h"
+#include "ui/gfx/native_widget_types.h"
namespace ui {
@@ -30,4 +34,34 @@ TEST(LayerOwnerTest, RecreateLayerHonorsTargetVisibilityAndOpacity) {
EXPECT_EQ(0.0f, owner.layer()->opacity());
}
+TEST(LayerOwnerTest, RecreateRootLayerWithNullCompositor) {
+ LayerOwner owner;
+ Layer* layer = new Layer;
+ owner.SetLayer(layer);
+
+ scoped_ptr<Layer> layer_copy = owner.RecreateLayer();
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(nullptr, owner.layer()->GetCompositor());
+ EXPECT_EQ(nullptr, layer_copy->GetCompositor());
+}
+
+TEST(LayerOwnerTest, RecreateRootLayerWithCompositor) {
+ LayerOwner owner;
+ Layer* layer = new Layer;
+ owner.SetLayer(layer);
+
+ ui::ContextFactory* context_factory =
+ ui::InitializeContextFactoryForTests(false);
+ scoped_refptr<base::SingleThreadTaskRunner> task_runner =
+ new base::NullTaskRunner();
+ scoped_ptr<ui::Compositor> compositor(new ui::Compositor(
+ gfx::kNullAcceleratedWidget, context_factory, task_runner));
+ compositor->SetRootLayer(layer);
+
+ scoped_ptr<Layer> layer_copy = owner.RecreateLayer();
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(compositor.get(), owner.layer()->GetCompositor());
+ EXPECT_EQ(nullptr, layer_copy->GetCompositor());
danakj 2015/03/06 17:53:58 Should you check that the compositor root layer is
bruthig 2015/03/06 18:10:46 Sure, that sounds like a good idea ;)
+}
+
} // namespace ui
« no previous file with comments | « ui/compositor/layer_owner.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698