|
|
Created:
5 years, 9 months ago by phoglund_chromium Modified:
5 years, 9 months ago CC:
chromium-reviews, posciak+watch_chromium.org, feature-media-reviews_chromium.org, wjia+watch_chromium.org, mcasas+watch_chromium.org Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master Project:
chromium Visibility:
Public. |
DescriptionAdding expand / secondary decode rate to WebRTC regression monitoring.
BUG=464277
Committed: https://crrev.com/c97215297520206ce229363f2736fff4de5918fc
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#319627}
Patch Set 1 #
Total comments: 2
Messages
Total messages: 18 (5 generated)
phoglund@chromium.org changed reviewers: + minyue@chromium.org
ping
Thank you for reminder. I did not pay much attention to this, since I do not receive many chromium reviews. My apologies. On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:00 AM, <phoglund@chromium.org> wrote: > ping > > https://codereview.chromium.org/980373002/ > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.
https://codereview.chromium.org/980373002/diff/1/chrome/browser/media/webrtc_... File chrome/browser/media/webrtc_browsertest_perf.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/980373002/diff/1/chrome/browser/media/webrtc_... chrome/browser/media/webrtc_browsertest_perf.cc:39: EXPECT_TRUE(pc_dict.GetString(Statistic("googExpandRate", ssrc), &value)); googSpeechExpandRate and googSecondaryDecodedRate are new wasn't even googExpandRate used before?
PTAL https://codereview.chromium.org/980373002/diff/1/chrome/browser/media/webrtc_... File chrome/browser/media/webrtc_browsertest_perf.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/980373002/diff/1/chrome/browser/media/webrtc_... chrome/browser/media/webrtc_browsertest_perf.cc:39: EXPECT_TRUE(pc_dict.GetString(Statistic("googExpandRate", ssrc), &value)); On 2015/03/09 11:56:01, minyue wrote: > googSpeechExpandRate and googSecondaryDecodedRate are new > > wasn't even googExpandRate used before? Nope, apparently not. I made this test a while back and it probably didn't exist by then.
Thanks for doing this! LGTM
The CQ bit was checked by phoglund@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/980373002/1
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted. Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer, _not_ a full super star committer. See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.
phoglund@chromium.org changed reviewers: + kjellander@chromium.org
Henrik: need committer lgtm as well
lgtm
The CQ bit was checked by phoglund@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/980373002/1
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #1 (id:1)
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as https://crrev.com/c97215297520206ce229363f2736fff4de5918fc Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#319627} |