Revert of Flate: fix valgrind miniz Conditional-jump-or-move-depends... error

Revert of Flate: fix valgrind miniz Conditional-jump-or-move-depends... error (patchset #2 id:20001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/964933003/)

Reason for revert:
Breaks the chrome build.

../../third_party/skia/src/core/SkFlate.cpp:37:22: error: assigning to 'MOZ_Z_alloc_func' (aka 'MOZ_Z_voidpf (*)(MOZ_Z_voidpf, MOZ_Z_uInt, MOZ_Z_uInt)') from incompatible type 'void *(*)(void *, size_t, size_t)': type mismatch at 2nd parameter ('MOZ_Z_uInt' (aka 'unsigned int') vs 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long'))
    flateData.zalloc = &skia_alloc_func;
                     ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../../third_party/skia/src/core/SkFlate.cpp:180:28: error: assigning to 'MOZ_Z_alloc_func' (aka 'MOZ_Z_voidpf (*)(MOZ_Z_voidpf, MOZ_Z_uInt, MOZ_Z_uInt)') from incompatible type 'void *(*)(void *, size_t, size_t)': type mismatch at 2nd parameter ('MOZ_Z_uInt' (aka 'unsigned int') vs 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long'))
    fImpl->fZStream.zalloc = &skia_alloc_func;


Original issue's description:
> Flate: fix valgrind miniz Conditional-jump-or-move-depends... error
> 
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/e0638f8ecfb609c89cab1aa8b498ad3f368b89d3

TBR=mtklein@google.com,halcanary@google.com
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true

Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/6dc4ef01a656a9f7c3087eec2ff5142c707ceb7f

[Stephen Chennney, 2015-02-27 19:02:27]

Created Revert of Flate: fix valgrind miniz Conditional-jump-or-move-depends...
error

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-27 19:03:11]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/964953002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-27 19:03:12]

Note for Reviewers:
The CQ is waiting for an approval.
If you believe that the CL is not ready yet, or if you would like to L-G-T-M
with comments then please uncheck the CQ checkbox.

Waiting for LGTM from valid reviewer(s) till 2015-02-28 01:03 UTC

[scroggo, 2015-02-27 19:39:21]

On 2015/02/27 19:03:12, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote:
> Note for Reviewers:
> The CQ is waiting for an approval.
> If you believe that the CL is not ready yet, or if you would like to L-G-T-M
> with comments then please uncheck the CQ checkbox.
> 
> Waiting for LGTM from valid reviewer(s) till 2015-02-28 01:03 UTC

LGTM

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-27 19:40:03]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/6dc4ef01a656a9f7c3087eec2ff5142c707ceb7f

[scroggo, 2015-02-27 19:40:19]

On 2015/02/27 19:39:21, scroggo wrote:
> On 2015/02/27 19:03:12, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote:
> > Note for Reviewers:
> > The CQ is waiting for an approval.
> > If you believe that the CL is not ready yet, or if you would like to L-G-T-M
> > with comments then please uncheck the CQ checkbox.
> > 
> > Waiting for LGTM from valid reviewer(s) till 2015-02-28 01:03 UTC
> 
> LGTM

Why did Chenney need an LGTM to revert?

[hal.canary, 2015-02-27 19:42:42]

http://crrev.com/963853002

[mtklein, 2015-02-27 19:45:53]

> Why did Chenney need an LGTM to revert?

He's not in CQ_COMMITTERS?