Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1)

Unified Diff: third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/tkt35xx.test

Issue 949043002: Add //third_party/sqlite to dirs_to_snapshot, remove net_sql.patch (Closed) Base URL: git@github.com:domokit/mojo.git@master
Patch Set: Created 5 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/tkt35xx.test
diff --git a/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/tkt35xx.test b/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/tkt35xx.test
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3b911c12472a68f44d1cfb601ec0db142e16f94a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/tkt35xx.test
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+# 2008 November 20
+#
+# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
+# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
+#
+# May you do good and not evil.
+# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
+# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
+#
+#***********************************************************************
+# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.
+#
+# When a transaction rolls back, make sure that dirty pages in the
+# page cache which are not in the rollback journal are reinitialized
+# in the btree layer.
+#
+# $Id: tkt35xx.test,v 1.4 2009/06/05 17:09:12 drh Exp $
+
+set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
+source $testdir/tester.tcl
+
+do_test tkt35xx-1.1 {
+ execsql {
+ PRAGMA auto_vacuum = 0;
+ PRAGMA page_size = 1024;
+ }
+} {}
+
+# Trigger the problem using explicit rollback.
+#
+do_test tkt35xx-1.1 {
+ execsql {
+ PRAGMA auto_vacuum = 0;
+ CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c);
+ CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(c);
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(0, 0, zeroblob(676));
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 1, zeroblob(676));
+ DELETE FROM t1;
+ BEGIN;
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(0, 0, zeroblob(676));
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 1, zeroblob(676));
+ ROLLBACK;
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(0, 0, zeroblob(676));
+ }
+ execsql {
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 1, zeroblob(676));
+ }
+} {}
+
+# Trigger the problem using statement rollback.
+#
+db close
+delete_file test.db
+sqlite3 db test.db
+set big [string repeat abcdefghij 22] ;# 220 byte string
+do_test tkt35xx-1.2.1 {
+ execsql {
+ PRAGMA auto_vacuum = 0;
+ PRAGMA page_size = 1024;
+ CREATE TABLE t3(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1, $big);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(2, $big);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(3, $big);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(4, $big);
+ CREATE TABLE t4(c, d);
+ INSERT INTO t4 VALUES(5, $big);
+ INSERT INTO t4 VALUES(1, $big);
+ }
+} {}
+do_test tkt35xx-1.2.2 {
+ catchsql {
+ BEGIN;
+ CREATE TABLE t5(e PRIMARY KEY, f);
+ DROP TABLE t5;
+ INSERT INTO t3(a, b) SELECT c, d FROM t4;
+ }
+} {1 {UNIQUE constraint failed: t3.a}}
+do_test tkt35xx-1.2.3 {
+ # Show that the transaction has not been rolled back.
+ catchsql BEGIN
+} {1 {cannot start a transaction within a transaction}}
+do_test tkt35xx-1.2.4 {
+ execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t3 }
+} {4}
+do_test tkt35xx-1.2.5 {
+ # Before the bug was fixed, if SQLITE_DEBUG was defined an assert()
+ # would fail during the following INSERT statement. If SQLITE_DEBUG
+ # was not defined, then the statement would pass and the transaction
+ # would be committed. But, the "SELECT count(*)" in tkt35xx-1.2.6 would
+ # return 1, not 5. Data magically disappeared!
+ #
+ execsql {
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(5, $big);
+ COMMIT;
+ }
+} {}
+do_test tkt35xx-1.2.6 {
+ execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t3 }
+} {5}
+integrity_check tkt35xx-1.2.7
+
+finish_test
« no previous file with comments | « third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/tkt3581.test ('k') | third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/tkt3630.test » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698