Add //third_party/sqlite to dirs_to_snapshot, remove net_sql.patch

third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/tkt3093.test

Index: third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/tkt3093.test
diff --git a/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/tkt3093.test b/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/tkt3093.test
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3be46d15cfec7fc4aa968fa52c6620186e431545
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/tkt3093.test
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+# 2008 May 2
+#
+# The author disclaims copyright to this source code.  In place of
+# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
+#
+#    May you do good and not evil.
+#    May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
+#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
+#
+#***********************************************************************
+#
+# Ticket #3093
+#
+# Verify that a busy callback waiting on a reserved lock resolves
+# once the lock clears.
+#
+# $Id: tkt3093.test,v 1.2 2008/05/02 14:23:55 drh Exp $
+#
+
+set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
+source $testdir/tester.tcl
+
+# Set up a test database
+#
+do_test tkt3093.1 {
+  db eval {
+    CREATE TABLE t1(x);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1);
+    SELECT * FROM t1
+  }
+} {1}
+
+# Establish a separate, independent connection to that database.
+#
+do_test tkt3093.2 {
+  catch {sqlite3_enable_shared_cache 0}
+  sqlite3 db2 test.db
+  db2 eval {
+    SELECT * FROM t1
+  }
+} {1}
+
+# Make sure that clearing a lock allows a pending request for
+# a reserved lock to continue.
+#
+do_test tkt3093.3 {
+  # This will be the busy callback for connection db2.  On the first
+  # busy callback, commit the transaction in db.  This should clear
+  # the lock so that there should not be a second callback.  If the
+  # busy handler is called a second time, then fail so that we get
+  # timeout.
+  proc busy_callback {cnt} {
+    if {$cnt==0} {
+      db eval COMMIT
+      return 0
+    } else {
+      return 1
+    }
+  }
+  db2 busy ::busy_callback
+
+  # Start a write transaction on db.
+  db eval {
+     BEGIN;
+     INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2);
+  }
+
+  # Attempt to modify the database on db2
+  catchsql {
+     UPDATE t1 SET x=x+1;
+  } db2
+} {0 {}}
+
+# Verify that everything worked as expected.  The db transaction should
+# have gone first and added entry 2.  Then the db2 transaction would have
+# run and added one to each entry.
+#
+do_test tkt3093.4 {
+  db eval {SELECT * FROM t1}
+} {2 3}
+do_test tkt3093.5 {
+  db2 eval {SELECT * FROM t1}
+} {2 3}
+db2 close
+
+finish_test