Add //third_party/sqlite to dirs_to_snapshot, remove net_sql.patch

third_party/sqlite/src/test/orderby6.test

Index: third_party/sqlite/src/test/orderby6.test
diff --git a/third_party/sqlite/src/test/orderby6.test b/third_party/sqlite/src/test/orderby6.test
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..403250ddb51a4464507a96d9757f5fc1bf765c25
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/sqlite/src/test/orderby6.test
@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
+# 2014-03-21
+#
+# The author disclaims copyright to this source code.  In place of
+# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
+#
+#    May you do good and not evil.
+#    May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
+#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
+#
+#***********************************************************************
+# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.  The
+# focus of this file is testing that the block-sort optimization.
+#
+
+
+set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
+source $testdir/tester.tcl
+set ::testprefix orderby6
+
+# Run all tests twice.  Once with a normal table and a second time
+# with a WITHOUT ROWID table
+#
+foreach {tn rowidclause} {1 {} 2 {WITHOUT ROWID}} {
+
+  # Construct a table with 1000 rows and a split primary key
+  #
+  reset_db
+  do_test $tn.1 {
+    db eval "CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c,PRIMARY KEY(b,c)) $rowidclause;"
+    db eval {
+      WITH RECURSIVE
+       cnt(x) AS (VALUES(1) UNION ALL SELECT x+1 FROM cnt WHERE x<1000)
+     INSERT INTO t1 SELECT x, x%40, x/40 FROM cnt;
+    }
+  } {}
+
+  # Run various ORDER BY queries that can benefit from block-sort.
+  # Compare the output to the same output using a full-sort enforced
+  # by adding + to each term of the ORDER BY clause.
+  #
+  do_execsql_test $tn.2 {
+    SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY b,a,c;
+  } [db eval {SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY +b,+a,+c}]
+  do_execsql_test $tn.3 {
+    SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY b,c DESC,a;
+  } [db eval {SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY +b,+c DESC,+a}]
+  do_execsql_test $tn.4 {
+    SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC,c,a;
+  } [db eval {SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY +b DESC,+c,+a}]
+  do_execsql_test $tn.5 {
+    SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC,a,c;
+  } [db eval {SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY +b DESC,+a,+c}]
+
+  # LIMIT and OFFSET clauses on block-sort queries.
+  #
+  do_execsql_test $tn.11 {
+    SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY b, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 20;
+  } {840 880 920 960 1000 1 41 81 121 161}
+  do_execsql_test $tn.11x {
+    SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY +b, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 20;
+  } {840 880 920 960 1000 1 41 81 121 161}
+
+  do_execsql_test $tn.12 {
+    SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 20;
+  } {839 879 919 959 999 38 78 118 158 198}
+  do_execsql_test $tn.12 {
+    SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY +b DESC, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 20;
+  } {839 879 919 959 999 38 78 118 158 198}
+
+  do_execsql_test $tn.13 {
+    SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY b, a DESC LIMIT 10 OFFSET 45;
+  } {161 121 81 41 1 962 922 882 842 802}
+  do_execsql_test $tn.13x {
+    SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY +b, a DESC LIMIT 10 OFFSET 45;
+  } {161 121 81 41 1 962 922 882 842 802}
+
+  do_execsql_test $tn.14 {
+    SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 45;
+  } {838 878 918 958 998 37 77 117 157 197}
+  do_execsql_test $tn.14x {
+    SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY +b DESC, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 45;
+  } {838 878 918 958 998 37 77 117 157 197}
+
+  # Many test cases where the LIMIT+OFFSET window is in various
+  # alignments with block-sort boundaries.
+  #
+  foreach {tx limit offset orderby} {
+     1  10 24 {+b,+a}
+     2  10 25 {+b,+a}
+     3  10 26 {+b,+a}
+     4  10 39 {+b,+a}
+     5  10 40 {+b,+a}
+     6  10 41 {+b,+a}
+     7  27 24 {+b,+a}
+     8  27 49 {+b,+a}
+     11 10 24 {+b DESC,+a}
+     12 10 25 {+b DESC,+a}
+     13 10 26 {+b DESC,+a}
+     14 10 39 {+b DESC,+a}
+     15 10 40 {+b DESC,+a}
+     16 10 41 {+b DESC,+a}
+     17 27 24 {+b DESC,+a}
+     18 27 49 {+b DESC,+a}
+     21 10 24 {+b,+a DESC}
+     22 10 25 {+b,+a DESC}
+     23 10 26 {+b,+a DESC}
+     24 10 39 {+b,+a DESC}
+     25 10 40 {+b,+a DESC}
+     26 10 41 {+b,+a DESC}
+     27 27 24 {+b,+a DESC}
+     28 27 49 {+b,+a DESC}
+     31 10 24 {+b DESC,+a DESC}
+     32 10 25 {+b DESC,+a DESC}
+     33 10 26 {+b DESC,+a DESC}
+     34 10 39 {+b DESC,+a DESC}
+     35 10 40 {+b DESC,+a DESC}
+     36 10 41 {+b DESC,+a DESC}
+     37 27 24 {+b DESC,+a DESC}
+     38 27 49 {+b DESC,+a DESC}
+  } {
+    set sql1 "SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY $orderby LIMIT $limit OFFSET $offset;"
+    set sql2 [string map {+ {}} $sql1]
+    # puts $sql2\n$sql1\n[db eval $sql2]
+    do_test $tn.21.$tx {db eval $::sql2} [db eval $sql1]
+  }
+
+  ########################################################################
+  # A second test table, t2, has many columns open to sorting.
+  do_test $tn.31 {
+    db eval "CREATE TABLE t2(a,b,c,d,e,f,PRIMARY KEY(b,c,d,e,f)) $rowidclause;"
+    db eval {
+      WITH RECURSIVE
+       cnt(x) AS (VALUES(0) UNION ALL SELECT x+1 FROM cnt WHERE x<242)
+     INSERT INTO t2 SELECT x,  x%3, (x/3)%3, (x/9)%3, (x/27)%3, (x/81)%3
+                      FROM cnt;
+    }
+  } {}
+
+  do_execsql_test $tn.32 {
+    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,e,f;
+  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f;}]
+  do_execsql_test $tn.33 {
+    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,e,+f;
+  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f;}]
+  do_execsql_test $tn.34 {
+    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,+e,+f;
+  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f;}]
+  do_execsql_test $tn.35 {
+    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,+d,+e,+f;
+  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f;}]
+  do_execsql_test $tn.36 {
+    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,+c,+d,+e,+f;
+  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f;}]
+
+  do_execsql_test $tn.37 {
+    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,e,f DESC;
+  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f DESC;}]
+  do_execsql_test $tn.38 {
+    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,e DESC,f;
+  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e DESC,+f;}]
+  do_execsql_test $tn.39 {
+    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d DESC,e,f;
+  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d DESC,+e,+f;}]
+  do_execsql_test $tn.40 {
+    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c DESC,d,e,f;
+  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c DESC,+d,+e,+f;}]
+  do_execsql_test $tn.41 {
+    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b DESC,c,d,e,f;
+  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b DESC,+c,+d,+e,+f;}]
+
+  do_execsql_test $tn.42 {
+    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b DESC,c DESC,d,e,f LIMIT 31;
+  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b DESC,+c DESC,+d,+e,+f LIMIT 31}]
+  do_execsql_test $tn.43 {
+    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,e,f DESC LIMIT 8 OFFSET 7;
+  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f DESC LIMIT 8 OFFSET 7}]
+
+
+}
+
+
+
+finish_test