Add suppressions for recently failing tests.

Add suppressions for recently failing tests.

BUG=458813, 460356, 460374, 460580
TBR=jbroman@chromium.org,jshin@chromium.org,yosin@chromium.org,zmo@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true

Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=190580

[Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit), 2015-02-20 19:41:05]

The CQ bit was checked by kbr@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-20 19:42:19]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/944933004/20001

[jbroman, 2015-02-20 20:07:22]

On 2015/02/20 19:42:19, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote:
> CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
>  https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/944933004/20001

Warning: this will collide with https://codereview.chromium.org/945943002/.

[Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit), 2015-02-20 20:23:10]

On 2015/02/20 20:07:22, jbroman wrote:
> On 2015/02/20 19:42:19, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote:
> > CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
> >  https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/944933004/20001
> 
> Warning: this will collide with https://codereview.chromium.org/945943002/.

Please let this land and then submit your rebaselines. The other suppressions
are needed to clear up redness on the Blink tree.

[Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit), 2015-02-20 21:39:44]

This is ridiculous -- these suppressions failed mac_blink_rel the first time
around because of more flaky tests. I'm incorporating those suppressions and
landing this NOTRY=true. We can't waste more hours on this.

@jam: this is an example of why NOTRY=true is occasionally needed.

[Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit), 2015-02-20 21:39:54]

The CQ bit was unchecked by kbr@chromium.org

[Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit), 2015-02-20 21:41:06]

The CQ bit was checked by kbr@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-20 21:42:24]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/944933004/40001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-20 21:43:22]

Committed patchset #3 (id:40001) as
https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=190580

[jam, 2015-02-20 21:45:24]

On 2015/02/20 21:39:44, Ken Russell wrote:
> This is ridiculous -- these suppressions failed mac_blink_rel the first time
> around because of more flaky tests. I'm incorporating those suppressions and
> landing this NOTRY=true. We can't waste more hours on this.
> 
> @jam: this is an example of why NOTRY=true is occasionally needed.

I'm only looking at chromium repo/CQ :) Before the repos merge stuff like this
will have to be fixed for layout tests.

[marja, 2015-02-23 08:39:37]

What's up w/ fast/workers/worker-exception-during-navigation.html ? At some
point I thought my CL https://codereview.chromium.org/936333005/ might affect it
since it showed red in my try jobs, but I tried it locally and it crashed both
with and without my CL. (My CL turns ASSERTs to RELEASE_ASSERTs anyway, so, if
the test hits those ASSERTs that should be clear from the error message, plus
that should've failed before...)

[Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit), 2015-02-23 18:40:23]

On 2015/02/23 08:39:37, marja wrote:
> What's up w/ fast/workers/worker-exception-during-navigation.html ? At some
> point I thought my CL https://codereview.chromium.org/936333005/ might affect
it
> since it showed red in my try jobs, but I tried it locally and it crashed both
> with and without my CL. (My CL turns ASSERTs to RELEASE_ASSERTs anyway, so, if
> the test hits those ASSERTs that should be clear from the error message, plus
> that should've failed before...)

Not sure -- please follow up on crbug.com/460356 .