| Index: sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/bpf_dsl_unittest.cc
|
| diff --git a/sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/bpf_dsl_unittest.cc b/sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/bpf_dsl_unittest.cc
|
| index 168eaecfcc4f4701b3de355c1a3d98d748bd8dc4..cffadc5035e05fd42275cecfbf0384ffe1221235 100644
|
| --- a/sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/bpf_dsl_unittest.cc
|
| +++ b/sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/bpf_dsl_unittest.cc
|
| @@ -16,95 +16,51 @@
|
| #include "base/macros.h"
|
| #include "build/build_config.h"
|
| #include "sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/bpf_dsl_impl.h"
|
| -#include "sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/codegen.h"
|
| #include "sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/policy.h"
|
| -#include "sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/policy_compiler.h"
|
| -#include "sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/seccomp_macros.h"
|
| -#include "sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/trap_registry.h"
|
| +#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/bpf_tests.h"
|
| #include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/errorcode.h"
|
| -#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/verifier.h"
|
| +#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/syscall.h"
|
| #include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
|
|
|
| #define CASES SANDBOX_BPF_DSL_CASES
|
| +
|
| +// Helper macro to assert that invoking system call |sys| directly via
|
| +// Syscall::Call with arguments |...| returns |res|.
|
| +// Errors can be asserted by specifying a value like "-EINVAL".
|
| +#define ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(res, sys, ...) \
|
| + BPF_ASSERT_EQ(res, Stubs::sys(__VA_ARGS__))
|
|
|
| namespace sandbox {
|
| namespace bpf_dsl {
|
| namespace {
|
|
|
| -// Helper function to construct fake arch_seccomp_data objects.
|
| -struct arch_seccomp_data FakeSyscall(int nr,
|
| - uint64_t p0 = 0,
|
| - uint64_t p1 = 0,
|
| - uint64_t p2 = 0,
|
| - uint64_t p3 = 0,
|
| - uint64_t p4 = 0,
|
| - uint64_t p5 = 0) {
|
| - // Made up program counter for syscall address.
|
| - const uint64_t kFakePC = 0x543210;
|
| -
|
| - struct arch_seccomp_data data = {
|
| - nr,
|
| - SECCOMP_ARCH,
|
| - kFakePC,
|
| - {
|
| - p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5,
|
| - },
|
| - };
|
| -
|
| - return data;
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -class FakeTrapRegistry : public TrapRegistry {
|
| - public:
|
| - FakeTrapRegistry() : next_id_(1) {}
|
| - virtual ~FakeTrapRegistry() {}
|
| -
|
| - uint16_t Add(TrapFnc fnc, const void* aux, bool safe) override {
|
| - EXPECT_NE(0U, next_id_);
|
| - return next_id_++;
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - bool EnableUnsafeTraps() override {
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << "Unimplemented";
|
| - return false;
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - private:
|
| - uint16_t next_id_;
|
| -
|
| - DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(FakeTrapRegistry);
|
| -};
|
| -
|
| -class PolicyEmulator {
|
| - public:
|
| - explicit PolicyEmulator(const Policy* policy) : program_(), traps_() {
|
| - program_ = *PolicyCompiler(policy, &traps_).Compile();
|
| - }
|
| - ~PolicyEmulator() {}
|
| -
|
| - uint32_t Emulate(const struct arch_seccomp_data& data) const {
|
| - const char* err = nullptr;
|
| - uint32_t res = Verifier::EvaluateBPF(program_, data, &err);
|
| - if (err) {
|
| - ADD_FAILURE() << err;
|
| - return 0;
|
| - }
|
| - return res;
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - void ExpectAllow(const struct arch_seccomp_data& data) const {
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, Emulate(data));
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - void ExpectErrno(uint16_t err, const struct arch_seccomp_data& data) const {
|
| - EXPECT_EQ(SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO | err, Emulate(data));
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - private:
|
| - CodeGen::Program program_;
|
| - FakeTrapRegistry traps_;
|
| -
|
| - DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(PolicyEmulator);
|
| +// Type safe stubs for tested system calls.
|
| +class Stubs {
|
| + public:
|
| + static int getpgid(pid_t pid) { return Syscall::Call(__NR_getpgid, pid); }
|
| + static int setuid(uid_t uid) { return Syscall::Call(__NR_setuid, uid); }
|
| + static int setgid(gid_t gid) { return Syscall::Call(__NR_setgid, gid); }
|
| + static int setpgid(pid_t pid, pid_t pgid) {
|
| + return Syscall::Call(__NR_setpgid, pid, pgid);
|
| + }
|
| +
|
| + static int fcntl(int fd, int cmd, unsigned long arg = 0) {
|
| + return Syscall::Call(__NR_fcntl, fd, cmd, arg);
|
| + }
|
| +
|
| + static int uname(struct utsname* buf) {
|
| + return Syscall::Call(__NR_uname, buf);
|
| + }
|
| +
|
| + static int setresuid(uid_t ruid, uid_t euid, uid_t suid) {
|
| + return Syscall::Call(__NR_setresuid, ruid, euid, suid);
|
| + }
|
| +
|
| +#if !defined(ARCH_CPU_X86)
|
| + static int socketpair(int domain, int type, int protocol, int sv[2]) {
|
| + return Syscall::Call(__NR_socketpair, domain, type, protocol, sv);
|
| + }
|
| +#endif
|
| };
|
|
|
| class BasicPolicy : public Policy {
|
| @@ -127,15 +83,12 @@
|
| DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(BasicPolicy);
|
| };
|
|
|
| -TEST(BPFDSL, Basic) {
|
| - BasicPolicy policy;
|
| - PolicyEmulator emulator(&policy);
|
| -
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EPERM, FakeSyscall(__NR_getpgid, 0));
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EINVAL, FakeSyscall(__NR_getpgid, 1));
|
| -
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(ENOMEM, FakeSyscall(__NR_setuid, 42));
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(ESRCH, FakeSyscall(__NR_setuid, 43));
|
| +BPF_TEST_C(BPFDSL, Basic, BasicPolicy) {
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EPERM, getpgid, 0);
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EINVAL, getpgid, 1);
|
| +
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-ENOMEM, setuid, 42);
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-ESRCH, setuid, 43);
|
| }
|
|
|
| /* On IA-32, socketpair() is implemented via socketcall(). :-( */
|
| @@ -159,30 +112,22 @@
|
| DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(BooleanLogicPolicy);
|
| };
|
|
|
| -TEST(BPFDSL, BooleanLogic) {
|
| - BooleanLogicPolicy policy;
|
| - PolicyEmulator emulator(&policy);
|
| -
|
| - const intptr_t kFakeSV = 0x12345;
|
| +BPF_TEST_C(BPFDSL, BooleanLogic, BooleanLogicPolicy) {
|
| + int sv[2];
|
|
|
| // Acceptable combinations that should return EPERM.
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(
|
| - EPERM, FakeSyscall(__NR_socketpair, AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, kFakeSV));
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(
|
| - EPERM, FakeSyscall(__NR_socketpair, AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0, kFakeSV));
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EPERM, socketpair, AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, sv);
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EPERM, socketpair, AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0, sv);
|
|
|
| // Combinations that are invalid for only one reason; should return EINVAL.
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(
|
| - EINVAL, FakeSyscall(__NR_socketpair, AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0, kFakeSV));
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EINVAL, FakeSyscall(__NR_socketpair, AF_UNIX,
|
| - SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0, kFakeSV));
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EINVAL, FakeSyscall(__NR_socketpair, AF_UNIX,
|
| - SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP, kFakeSV));
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EINVAL, socketpair, AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0, sv);
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EINVAL, socketpair, AF_UNIX, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0, sv);
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(
|
| + -EINVAL, socketpair, AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP, sv);
|
|
|
| // Completely unacceptable combination; should also return EINVAL.
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(
|
| - EINVAL, FakeSyscall(__NR_socketpair, AF_INET, SOCK_SEQPACKET, IPPROTO_UDP,
|
| - kFakeSV));
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(
|
| + -EINVAL, socketpair, AF_INET, SOCK_SEQPACKET, IPPROTO_UDP, sv);
|
| }
|
| #endif // !ARCH_CPU_X86
|
|
|
| @@ -204,23 +149,20 @@
|
| DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(MoreBooleanLogicPolicy);
|
| };
|
|
|
| -TEST(BPFDSL, MoreBooleanLogic) {
|
| - MoreBooleanLogicPolicy policy;
|
| - PolicyEmulator emulator(&policy);
|
| -
|
| +BPF_TEST_C(BPFDSL, MoreBooleanLogic, MoreBooleanLogicPolicy) {
|
| // Expect EPERM if any set to 0.
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EPERM, FakeSyscall(__NR_setresuid, 0, 5, 5));
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EPERM, FakeSyscall(__NR_setresuid, 5, 0, 5));
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EPERM, FakeSyscall(__NR_setresuid, 5, 5, 0));
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EPERM, setresuid, 0, 5, 5);
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EPERM, setresuid, 5, 0, 5);
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EPERM, setresuid, 5, 5, 0);
|
|
|
| // Expect EAGAIN if all set to 1.
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EAGAIN, FakeSyscall(__NR_setresuid, 1, 1, 1));
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EAGAIN, setresuid, 1, 1, 1);
|
|
|
| // Expect EINVAL for anything else.
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EINVAL, FakeSyscall(__NR_setresuid, 5, 1, 1));
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EINVAL, FakeSyscall(__NR_setresuid, 1, 5, 1));
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EINVAL, FakeSyscall(__NR_setresuid, 1, 1, 5));
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EINVAL, FakeSyscall(__NR_setresuid, 3, 4, 5));
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EINVAL, setresuid, 5, 1, 1);
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EINVAL, setresuid, 1, 5, 1);
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EINVAL, setresuid, 1, 1, 5);
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EINVAL, setresuid, 3, 4, 5);
|
| }
|
|
|
| static const uintptr_t kDeadBeefAddr =
|
| @@ -242,16 +184,12 @@
|
| DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(ArgSizePolicy);
|
| };
|
|
|
| -TEST(BPFDSL, ArgSizeTest) {
|
| - ArgSizePolicy policy;
|
| - PolicyEmulator emulator(&policy);
|
| -
|
| - emulator.ExpectAllow(FakeSyscall(__NR_uname, 0));
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EPERM, FakeSyscall(__NR_uname, kDeadBeefAddr));
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -#if 0
|
| -// TODO(mdempsky): This is really an integration test.
|
| +BPF_TEST_C(BPFDSL, ArgSizeTest, ArgSizePolicy) {
|
| + struct utsname buf;
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(0, uname, &buf);
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(
|
| + -EPERM, uname, reinterpret_cast<struct utsname*>(kDeadBeefAddr));
|
| +}
|
|
|
| class TrappingPolicy : public Policy {
|
| public:
|
| @@ -282,7 +220,6 @@
|
| ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(2, uname, NULL);
|
| ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(3, uname, NULL);
|
| }
|
| -#endif
|
|
|
| class MaskingPolicy : public Policy {
|
| public:
|
| @@ -308,23 +245,20 @@
|
| DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(MaskingPolicy);
|
| };
|
|
|
| -TEST(BPFDSL, MaskTest) {
|
| - MaskingPolicy policy;
|
| - PolicyEmulator emulator(&policy);
|
| -
|
| +BPF_TEST_C(BPFDSL, MaskTest, MaskingPolicy) {
|
| for (uid_t uid = 0; uid < 0x100; ++uid) {
|
| const int expect_errno = (uid & 0xf) == 0 ? EINVAL : EACCES;
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(expect_errno, FakeSyscall(__NR_setuid, uid));
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-expect_errno, setuid, uid);
|
| }
|
|
|
| for (gid_t gid = 0; gid < 0x100; ++gid) {
|
| const int expect_errno = (gid & 0xf0) == 0xf0 ? EINVAL : EACCES;
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(expect_errno, FakeSyscall(__NR_setgid, gid));
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-expect_errno, setgid, gid);
|
| }
|
|
|
| for (pid_t pid = 0; pid < 0x100; ++pid) {
|
| const int expect_errno = (pid & 0xa5) == 0xa0 ? EINVAL : EACCES;
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(expect_errno, FakeSyscall(__NR_setpgid, pid, 0));
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-expect_errno, setpgid, pid, 0);
|
| }
|
| }
|
|
|
| @@ -347,20 +281,17 @@
|
| DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(ElseIfPolicy);
|
| };
|
|
|
| -TEST(BPFDSL, ElseIfTest) {
|
| - ElseIfPolicy policy;
|
| - PolicyEmulator emulator(&policy);
|
| -
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(0, FakeSyscall(__NR_setuid, 0));
|
| -
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EINVAL, FakeSyscall(__NR_setuid, 0x0001));
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EINVAL, FakeSyscall(__NR_setuid, 0x0002));
|
| -
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EEXIST, FakeSyscall(__NR_setuid, 0x0011));
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EEXIST, FakeSyscall(__NR_setuid, 0x0022));
|
| -
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EACCES, FakeSyscall(__NR_setuid, 0x0111));
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EACCES, FakeSyscall(__NR_setuid, 0x0222));
|
| +BPF_TEST_C(BPFDSL, ElseIfTest, ElseIfPolicy) {
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(0, setuid, 0);
|
| +
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EINVAL, setuid, 0x0001);
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EINVAL, setuid, 0x0002);
|
| +
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EEXIST, setuid, 0x0011);
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EEXIST, setuid, 0x0022);
|
| +
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EACCES, setuid, 0x0111);
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EACCES, setuid, 0x0222);
|
| }
|
|
|
| class SwitchPolicy : public Policy {
|
| @@ -384,25 +315,19 @@
|
| DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(SwitchPolicy);
|
| };
|
|
|
| -TEST(BPFDSL, SwitchTest) {
|
| - SwitchPolicy policy;
|
| - PolicyEmulator emulator(&policy);
|
| -
|
| - const int kFakeSockFD = 42;
|
| -
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(ENOENT, FakeSyscall(__NR_fcntl, kFakeSockFD, F_GETFD));
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(ENOENT, FakeSyscall(__NR_fcntl, kFakeSockFD, F_GETFL));
|
| -
|
| - emulator.ExpectAllow(
|
| - FakeSyscall(__NR_fcntl, kFakeSockFD, F_SETFD, O_CLOEXEC));
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EINVAL,
|
| - FakeSyscall(__NR_fcntl, kFakeSockFD, F_SETFD, 0));
|
| -
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EPERM,
|
| - FakeSyscall(__NR_fcntl, kFakeSockFD, F_SETFL, O_RDONLY));
|
| -
|
| - emulator.ExpectErrno(EACCES,
|
| - FakeSyscall(__NR_fcntl, kFakeSockFD, F_DUPFD, 0));
|
| +BPF_TEST_C(BPFDSL, SwitchTest, SwitchPolicy) {
|
| + base::ScopedFD sock_fd(socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0));
|
| + BPF_ASSERT(sock_fd.is_valid());
|
| +
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-ENOENT, fcntl, sock_fd.get(), F_GETFD);
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-ENOENT, fcntl, sock_fd.get(), F_GETFL);
|
| +
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(0, fcntl, sock_fd.get(), F_SETFD, O_CLOEXEC);
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EINVAL, fcntl, sock_fd.get(), F_SETFD, 0);
|
| +
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EPERM, fcntl, sock_fd.get(), F_SETFL, O_RDONLY);
|
| +
|
| + ASSERT_SYSCALL_RESULT(-EACCES, fcntl, sock_fd.get(), F_DUPFD, 0);
|
| }
|
|
|
| static intptr_t DummyTrap(const struct arch_seccomp_data& data, void* aux) {
|
|
|