Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(355)

Unified Diff: sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/policy_compiler.cc

Issue 937303005: Revert of bpf_dsl: decouple PolicyCompiler from Syscall (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 5 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/policy_compiler.cc
diff --git a/sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/policy_compiler.cc b/sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/policy_compiler.cc
index bcfd21b77658d9abc8bb1abd4260b66b7f12fd23..18ed7be582a363367c23a39c10230aa42b4acd39 100644
--- a/sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/policy_compiler.cc
+++ b/sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/policy_compiler.cc
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include "sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/syscall_set.h"
#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/die.h"
#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/errorcode.h"
+#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/syscall.h"
#include "sandbox/linux/system_headers/linux_seccomp.h"
namespace sandbox {
@@ -85,7 +86,6 @@
PolicyCompiler::PolicyCompiler(const Policy* policy, TrapRegistry* registry)
: policy_(policy),
registry_(registry),
- escapepc_(0),
conds_(),
gen_(),
has_unsafe_traps_(HasUnsafeTraps(policy_)) {
@@ -106,8 +106,11 @@
// measures that the sandbox provides, we print a big warning message --
// and of course, we make sure to only ever enable this feature if it
// is actually requested by the sandbox policy.
-
- CHECK_NE(0U, escapepc_) << "UnsafeTrap() requires a valid escape PC";
+ if (Syscall::Call(-1) == -1 && errno == ENOSYS) {
+ SANDBOX_DIE(
+ "Support for UnsafeTrap() has not yet been ported to this "
+ "architecture");
+ }
for (int sysnum : kSyscallsRequiredForUnsafeTraps) {
if (!policy_->EvaluateSyscall(sysnum)->IsAllow()) {
@@ -131,10 +134,6 @@
scoped_ptr<CodeGen::Program> program(new CodeGen::Program());
gen_.Compile(AssemblePolicy(), program.get());
return program.Pass();
-}
-
-void PolicyCompiler::DangerousSetEscapePC(uint64_t escapepc) {
- escapepc_ = escapepc;
}
CodeGen::Node PolicyCompiler::AssemblePolicy() {
@@ -163,13 +162,12 @@
return rest;
}
- // We already enabled unsafe traps in Compile, but enable them again to give
- // the trap registry a second chance to complain before we add the backdoor.
- CHECK(registry_->EnableUnsafeTraps());
-
- // Allow system calls, if they originate from our magic return address.
- const uint32_t lopc = static_cast<uint32_t>(escapepc_);
- const uint32_t hipc = static_cast<uint32_t>(escapepc_ >> 32);
+ // Allow system calls, if they originate from our magic return address
+ // (which we can query by calling Syscall::Call(-1)).
+ uint64_t syscall_entry_point =
+ static_cast<uint64_t>(static_cast<uintptr_t>(Syscall::Call(-1)));
+ uint32_t low = static_cast<uint32_t>(syscall_entry_point);
+ uint32_t hi = static_cast<uint32_t>(syscall_entry_point >> 32);
// BPF cannot do native 64-bit comparisons, so we have to compare
// both 32-bit halves of the instruction pointer. If they match what
@@ -181,10 +179,10 @@
return gen_.MakeInstruction(
BPF_LD + BPF_W + BPF_ABS, SECCOMP_IP_LSB_IDX,
gen_.MakeInstruction(
- BPF_JMP + BPF_JEQ + BPF_K, lopc,
+ BPF_JMP + BPF_JEQ + BPF_K, low,
gen_.MakeInstruction(
BPF_LD + BPF_W + BPF_ABS, SECCOMP_IP_MSB_IDX,
- gen_.MakeInstruction(BPF_JMP + BPF_JEQ + BPF_K, hipc,
+ gen_.MakeInstruction(BPF_JMP + BPF_JEQ + BPF_K, hi,
CompileResult(Allow()), rest)),
rest));
}
« no previous file with comments | « sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/policy_compiler.h ('k') | sandbox/linux/integration_tests/bpf_dsl_seccomp_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698