Index: LayoutTests/platform/win/tables/mozilla_expected_failures/bugs/bug80762-2-expected.txt |
diff --git a/LayoutTests/platform/win/tables/mozilla_expected_failures/bugs/bug80762-2-expected.txt b/LayoutTests/platform/win/tables/mozilla_expected_failures/bugs/bug80762-2-expected.txt |
index f4509e877f22c65bc092890a987a02e82fbb99f5..bf51ab83e17c7649f3e61ccb8c7ad52f921d7c1a 100644 |
--- a/LayoutTests/platform/win/tables/mozilla_expected_failures/bugs/bug80762-2-expected.txt |
+++ b/LayoutTests/platform/win/tables/mozilla_expected_failures/bugs/bug80762-2-expected.txt |
@@ -21,31 +21,31 @@ layer at (0,0) size 785x752 backgroundClip at (0,0) size 785x600 clip at (0,0) s |
RenderText {#text} at (2,2) size 720x35 |
text run at (2,2) width 720: "When the Whiten house burned down in Renfrew Ontario, the insurer denied liability, asserting that the Plaintiff" |
text run at (2,20) width 477: "Daphne Whiten was the cause of the fire herself and had committed arson." |
- RenderBR {BR} at (478,34) size 1x0 |
- RenderBR {BR} at (2,38) size 0x17 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (478,34) size 1x0 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (2,38) size 0x17 |
RenderText {#text} at (2,56) size 742x71 |
text run at (2,56) width 740: "The insurance company had not only refused to pay, but had received opinions from its adjuster, its expert engineer" |
text run at (2,74) width 732: "and an investigative agency that the fire was accidental. Its own adjuster had recommended the claim be paid. The" |
text run at (2,92) width 735: "defendant's counsel, as the court found, had pressured experts to provide opinions supporting an arson defence and" |
text run at (2,110) width 742: "withheld relevant information from the experts and gave them misleading information to buttress the arson defence." |
- RenderBR {BR} at (743,124) size 1x0 |
- RenderBR {BR} at (2,128) size 0x17 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (743,124) size 1x0 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (2,128) size 0x17 |
RenderText {#text} at (2,146) size 645x17 |
text run at (2,146) width 645: "After the fire the Plaintiff and her husband, Keith Whiten needed welfare assistance to support them." |
- RenderBR {BR} at (646,160) size 1x0 |
- RenderBR {BR} at (2,164) size 0x17 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (646,160) size 1x0 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (2,164) size 0x17 |
RenderText {#text} at (2,182) size 747x53 |
text run at (2,182) width 735: "The jury, however, in a 4 week trial, disagreed with the position of the insurance company. It awarded not only the" |
text run at (2,200) width 747: "policy sum against the insurer, but also was sufficiently annoyed with the conduct of the company to award a further" |
text run at (2,218) width 241: "punitive damage award of $1 million." |
- RenderBR {BR} at (242,232) size 1x0 |
- RenderBR {BR} at (2,236) size 0x17 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (242,232) size 1x0 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (2,236) size 0x17 |
RenderText {#text} at (2,254) size 712x53 |
text run at (2,254) width 710: "The company appealed. At the time of the appeal, the company acknowledged that the fire was accidental. The" |
text run at (2,272) width 712: "Ontario Court of Appeal reversed the jury award and in a 2-1 decision determined that there should be a cap on" |
text run at (2,290) width 198: "punitive damages of $100,000." |
- RenderBR {BR} at (199,304) size 1x0 |
- RenderBR {BR} at (2,308) size 0x17 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (199,304) size 1x0 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (2,308) size 0x17 |
RenderText {#text} at (2,326) size 753x89 |
text run at (2,326) width 719: "Lawyers became hard pressed to reconcile this decision with a prior case, Hill vs. Church of Scientology. Hill, a" |
text run at (2,344) width 732: "Crown Attorney, had sued the Church for libel due to statements made accusing him of breaching a judge's order. " |
@@ -53,26 +53,26 @@ layer at (0,0) size 785x752 backgroundClip at (0,0) size 785x600 clip at (0,0) s |
text run at (2,362) width 729: "succeeded. The jury at trial, aside from awarding compensatory damages, also awarded a punitive damage sum of" |
text run at (2,380) width 753: "$800,000. The decision was appealed without success to the Ontario Court of Appeal and again to the Supreme Court" |
text run at (2,398) width 523: "of Canada. The award of punitive damages was sustained at both appellate levels." |
- RenderBR {BR} at (524,412) size 1x0 |
- RenderBR {BR} at (2,416) size 0x17 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (524,412) size 1x0 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (2,416) size 0x17 |
RenderText {#text} at (2,434) size 746x53 |
text run at (2,434) width 746: "In the Whiten case, the insurance industry is mounting all its ammunition to maintain the notion of a cap on punitive" |
text run at (2,452) width 735: "damages. It is expected that the Court of Appeal decision will receive a rough ride in the Supreme Court, given the" |
text run at (2,470) width 199: "Hill decision a few years prior." |
- RenderBR {BR} at (200,484) size 1x0 |
- RenderBR {BR} at (2,488) size 0x17 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (200,484) size 1x0 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (2,488) size 0x17 |
RenderText {#text} at (2,506) size 747x71 |
text run at (2,506) width 737: "The concept of punitive damages is designed to act as civil penalty imposed on a wrong doer, which has conducted" |
text run at (2,524) width 747: "itself in a vindictive manner, which offends one's sense of propriety - high handed shocking behaviour. Traditionally" |
text run at (2,542) width 707: "the financial abilities of the wrong doer are a factor - the deeper the pockets the more substantial the sum to be" |
text run at (2,560) width 59: "awarded." |
- RenderBR {BR} at (60,574) size 1x0 |
- RenderBR {BR} at (2,578) size 0x17 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (60,574) size 1x0 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (2,578) size 0x17 |
RenderText {#text} at (2,596) size 753x89 |
text run at (2,596) width 734: "Canadian courts have been reluctant to embrace the concept - awards such as Hill are rare. It is worthy of note that" |
text run at (2,614) width 735: "the dissenting reasons of Justice Laskin in Whiten were much in favour of maintaining the trial award - a lucid and" |
text run at (2,632) width 737: "powerful dissent written by a much respected jurist. Much attention will be given to this decision. Oral argument is" |
text run at (2,650) width 753: "set for the week of December 11th. A decision will likely be forthcoming in March to June time period. This decision" |
text run at (2,668) width 537: "will be no doubt a much quoted decision for many years, regardless of the outcome." |
- RenderBR {BR} at (538,682) size 1x0 |
- RenderBR {BR} at (2,686) size 0x17 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (538,682) size 1x0 |
+ LayoutBR {BR} at (2,686) size 0x17 |