Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(111)

Unified Diff: content/browser/security_exploit_browsertest.cc

Issue 92873004: Prevent the browser process from creating duplicate RenderViewHosts. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Fixes based on Charlie's review. Created 7 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/browser/security_exploit_browsertest.cc
diff --git a/content/browser/security_exploit_browsertest.cc b/content/browser/security_exploit_browsertest.cc
index 2eb7b51885b48168df9a248d249eee2bc44195dd..8ead1c3f812b26b19280666e0cbf8d373733e479 100644
--- a/content/browser/security_exploit_browsertest.cc
+++ b/content/browser/security_exploit_browsertest.cc
@@ -3,11 +3,19 @@
// found in the LICENSE file.
#include "base/command_line.h"
+#include "base/containers/hash_tables.h"
+#include "content/browser/dom_storage/dom_storage_context_wrapper.h"
+#include "content/browser/dom_storage/session_storage_namespace_impl.h"
+#include "content/browser/renderer_host/render_view_host_factory.h"
#include "content/browser/renderer_host/render_view_host_impl.h"
#include "content/browser/web_contents/web_contents_impl.h"
+#include "content/common/view_messages.h"
+#include "content/public/browser/browser_context.h"
#include "content/public/browser/notification_service.h"
#include "content/public/browser/notification_types.h"
+#include "content/public/browser/storage_partition.h"
#include "content/public/common/content_switches.h"
+#include "content/public/test/browser_test_utils.h"
#include "content/public/test/test_utils.h"
#include "content/shell/browser/shell.h"
#include "content/test/content_browser_test.h"
@@ -52,4 +60,122 @@ IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(SecurityExploitBrowserTest, SetWebUIProperty) {
terminated.Wait();
}
+// RenderViewHostFactory object which tracks creations of RenderViewHost objects
+// to ensure there are no duplicates. It is used by the following
+// AttemptDuplicateRVH test case.
+class TrackingRenderViewHostFactory : public RenderViewHostFactory {
+ public:
+ TrackingRenderViewHostFactory() : has_duplicates_(false) {
+ RegisterFactory(this);
+ }
+
+ virtual ~TrackingRenderViewHostFactory() {
+ UnregisterFactory();
+ }
+
+ // RenderViewHostFactory implementation.
+ virtual RenderViewHost* CreateRenderViewHost(
+ SiteInstance* instance,
+ RenderViewHostDelegate* delegate,
+ RenderWidgetHostDelegate* widget_delegate,
+ int routing_id,
+ int main_frame_routing_id,
+ bool swapped_out) OVERRIDE {
+ std::pair<int, int> id = std::make_pair(
+ instance->GetProcess()->GetID(), routing_id);
+
+ DuplicatesSet::iterator it = rvh_map_.find(id);
+ if (it != rvh_map_.end())
+ has_duplicates_ = true;
+
+ RenderViewHostImpl* rvh = new RenderViewHostImpl(
+ instance, delegate, widget_delegate, routing_id, main_frame_routing_id,
+ swapped_out, false);
+ rvh_map_.insert(id);
+
+ return rvh;
+ }
+
+ bool has_duplicates() {
+ return has_duplicates_;
+ }
+
+ private:
+ typedef base::hash_set<std::pair<int,int> > DuplicatesSet;
Charlie Reis 2013/12/02 22:25:34 nit: DuplicatesSet -> IDSet (It doesn't actually
nasko 2013/12/02 22:51:08 Done.
+ DuplicatesSet rvh_map_;
Charlie Reis 2013/12/02 22:25:34 nit: rvh_map_ isn't the right name anymore. rvh_i
nasko 2013/12/02 22:51:08 Done.
+
+ bool has_duplicates_;
+
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(TrackingRenderViewHostFactory);
+};
+
+// This is a test for crbug.com/312016. It tries to create two RenderViewHosts
+// with the same process and routing ids, which causes a collision.
+// It creates a couple of windows in process 1, which causes a few routing ids
+// to be allocated. Then a cross-process navigation is initiated, which causes a
+// new process 2 to be created and have a pending RenderViewHost for it.
+// Before the commit of the new pending RenderViewHost, it creates a new window
+// through process 2. The original bug caused the new window RenderViewHost
+// to be created in process 1 with a routing id which has already been
+// allocated.
+IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(SecurityExploitBrowserTest, AttemptDuplicateRVH) {
+ TrackingRenderViewHostFactory rvh_factory;
+ GURL foo("http://foo.com/files/simple_page.html");
+
+ // Start off with initial navigation, so we get the first process allocated.
+ NavigateToURL(shell(), foo);
+
+ // Open another window, so we generate some more routing ids.
+ ShellAddedObserver shell2_observer;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(ExecuteScript(
+ shell()->web_contents(), "window.open(document.URL + '#2');"));
+ Shell* shell2 = shell2_observer.GetShell();
+
+ // The new window must be in the same process, but have a new routing id.
+ EXPECT_EQ(shell()->web_contents()->GetRenderViewHost()->GetProcess()->GetID(),
+ shell2->web_contents()->GetRenderViewHost()->GetProcess()->GetID());
+ int window2_routing_id =
+ shell2->web_contents()->GetRenderViewHost()->GetRoutingID();
+ EXPECT_NE(window2_routing_id,
+ shell()->web_contents()->GetRenderViewHost()->GetRoutingID());
+
+ // Now, simulate a link click coming from the renderer.
+ GURL extension_url("https://bar.com/files/simple_page.html");
+ WebContentsImpl* wc = static_cast<WebContentsImpl*>(
+ shell()->web_contents());
+ wc->RequestOpenURL(
+ shell()->web_contents()->GetRenderViewHost(), extension_url,
+ Referrer(), CURRENT_TAB, wc->GetFrameTree()->root()->frame_id(),
+ false, true);
+
+ // Since the navigation above requires a cross-process swap, there will be a
+ // pending RenderViewHost. Ensure it exists and is in a different process
+ // than the initial page.
+ RenderViewHostImpl* pending_rvh =
+ wc->GetRenderManagerForTesting()->pending_render_view_host();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(pending_rvh != NULL);
+ EXPECT_NE(shell()->web_contents()->GetRenderViewHost()->GetProcess()->GetID(),
+ pending_rvh->GetProcess()->GetID());
+
+ // Since this test executes on the UI thread and hopping threads might cause
+ // different timing in the test, let's simulate a CreateNewWindow call coming
+ // from the IO thread.
+ ViewHostMsg_CreateWindow_Params params;
+ DOMStorageContextWrapper* dom_storage_context =
+ static_cast<DOMStorageContextWrapper*>(
+ BrowserContext::GetStoragePartition(
+ wc->GetBrowserContext(),
+ pending_rvh->GetSiteInstance())->GetDOMStorageContext());
+ SessionStorageNamespaceImpl* session_storage =
+ new SessionStorageNamespaceImpl(dom_storage_context);
+ // Cause a deliberate collision in routing ids.
+ int routing_id = window2_routing_id;
+ int main_frame_routing_id = routing_id + 1;
+
+ pending_rvh->CreateNewWindow(
+ routing_id, main_frame_routing_id, params, session_storage);
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(rvh_factory.has_duplicates());
}
+
+} // namespace content

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698