Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(857)

Unified Diff: content/renderer/scheduler/task_queue_manager_unittest.cc

Issue 922733002: scheduler: Implement task observers (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Roll in the refactor. Created 5 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/renderer/scheduler/task_queue_manager_unittest.cc
diff --git a/content/renderer/scheduler/task_queue_manager_unittest.cc b/content/renderer/scheduler/task_queue_manager_unittest.cc
index 62e6c349c372dd16a92bd74488a27f23eaf3743a..f8a80b66b7bc5a4a6b238c061788f100e6972584 100644
--- a/content/renderer/scheduler/task_queue_manager_unittest.cc
+++ b/content/renderer/scheduler/task_queue_manager_unittest.cc
@@ -582,5 +582,87 @@ TEST_F(TaskQueueManagerTest, InterruptWorkBatchForDelayedTask) {
EXPECT_THAT(run_order, ElementsAre(2, 3, 1));
}
+class TestTaskObserver : public base::MessageLoop::TaskObserver {
+ public:
+ TestTaskObserver() : will_count_(0), did_count_(0) {}
+
+ void DidProcessTask(const base::PendingTask& task) override { did_count_++; }
+
+ void WillProcessTask(const base::PendingTask& task) override {
alex clarke (OOO till 29th) 2015/02/13 14:42:18 This is OK however gmock does have native support
Sami 2015/02/13 15:54:31 Thanks for the suggestion. It's a bit neater this
+ will_count_++;
+ }
+
+ int CallsToWillProcess() const { return will_count_; }
+ int CallsToDidProcess() const { return did_count_; }
+
+ private:
+ int will_count_;
+ int did_count_;
+};
+
+TEST_F(TaskQueueManagerTest, TaskObserverAdding) {
+ Initialize(1u);
+ TestTaskObserver observer;
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, observer.CallsToWillProcess());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, observer.CallsToDidProcess());
+ manager_->AddTaskObserver(&observer);
+
+ std::vector<int> run_order;
+ scoped_refptr<base::SingleThreadTaskRunner> runner =
+ manager_->TaskRunnerForQueue(0);
+
+ runner->PostTask(FROM_HERE, base::Bind(&TestTask, 1, &run_order));
+ runner->PostTask(FROM_HERE, base::Bind(&TestTask, 2, &run_order));
+
+ selector_->AppendQueueToService(0);
+ selector_->AppendQueueToService(0);
+ test_task_runner_->RunUntilIdle();
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, observer.CallsToWillProcess());
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, observer.CallsToDidProcess());
+}
+
+TEST_F(TaskQueueManagerTest, TaskObserverRemoving) {
+ Initialize(1u);
+ TestTaskObserver observer;
+ manager_->AddTaskObserver(&observer);
+ manager_->RemoveTaskObserver(&observer);
+
+ std::vector<int> run_order;
+ scoped_refptr<base::SingleThreadTaskRunner> runner =
+ manager_->TaskRunnerForQueue(0);
+
+ runner->PostTask(FROM_HERE, base::Bind(&TestTask, 1, &run_order));
+
+ selector_->AppendQueueToService(0);
+ test_task_runner_->RunUntilIdle();
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, observer.CallsToWillProcess());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, observer.CallsToDidProcess());
+}
+
+void RemoveObserverTask(TaskQueueManager* manager,
+ base::MessageLoop::TaskObserver* observer) {
+ manager->RemoveTaskObserver(observer);
+}
+
+TEST_F(TaskQueueManagerTest, TaskObserverRemovingInsideTask) {
+ Initialize(1u);
+ TestTaskObserver observer;
+ manager_->AddTaskObserver(&observer);
+
+ scoped_refptr<base::SingleThreadTaskRunner> runner =
+ manager_->TaskRunnerForQueue(0);
+ runner->PostTask(FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&RemoveObserverTask, manager_.get(), &observer));
+
+ selector_->AppendQueueToService(0);
+ test_task_runner_->RunUntilIdle();
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, observer.CallsToWillProcess());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, observer.CallsToDidProcess());
+}
+
} // namespace
} // namespace content
« no previous file with comments | « content/renderer/scheduler/task_queue_manager.cc ('k') | content/renderer/scheduler/webthread_impl_for_scheduler.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698