Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(2653)

Unified Diff: content/renderer/scheduler/task_queue_manager_unittest.cc

Issue 922733002: scheduler: Implement task observers (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Review comments. Created 5 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/renderer/scheduler/task_queue_manager_unittest.cc
diff --git a/content/renderer/scheduler/task_queue_manager_unittest.cc b/content/renderer/scheduler/task_queue_manager_unittest.cc
index 62e6c349c372dd16a92bd74488a27f23eaf3743a..030ffe3e15ac2b398f41122060455a839a648972 100644
--- a/content/renderer/scheduler/task_queue_manager_unittest.cc
+++ b/content/renderer/scheduler/task_queue_manager_unittest.cc
@@ -582,5 +582,65 @@ TEST_F(TaskQueueManagerTest, InterruptWorkBatchForDelayedTask) {
EXPECT_THAT(run_order, ElementsAre(2, 3, 1));
}
+class TestTaskObserver : public base::MessageLoop::TaskObserver {
+ public:
+ TestTaskObserver() : will_count_(0), did_count_(0) {}
+
+ void DidProcessTask(const base::PendingTask& task) override { did_count_++; }
+
+ void WillProcessTask(const base::PendingTask& task) override {
+ will_count_++;
+ }
+
+ int CallsToWillProcess() const { return will_count_; }
+ int CallsToDidProcess() const { return did_count_; }
+
+ private:
+ int will_count_;
+ int did_count_;
+};
+
+TEST_F(TaskQueueManagerTest, TaskObserverAdding) {
+ Initialize(1u);
+ TestTaskObserver observer;
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, observer.CallsToWillProcess());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, observer.CallsToDidProcess());
+ manager_->AddTaskObserver(&observer);
+
+ std::vector<int> run_order;
+ scoped_refptr<base::SingleThreadTaskRunner> runner =
+ manager_->TaskRunnerForQueue(0);
+
+ runner->PostTask(FROM_HERE, base::Bind(&TestTask, 1, &run_order));
+ runner->PostTask(FROM_HERE, base::Bind(&TestTask, 2, &run_order));
+
+ selector_->AppendQueueToService(0);
+ selector_->AppendQueueToService(0);
+ test_task_runner_->RunUntilIdle();
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, observer.CallsToWillProcess());
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, observer.CallsToDidProcess());
+}
+
+TEST_F(TaskQueueManagerTest, TaskObserverRemoving) {
+ Initialize(1u);
+ TestTaskObserver observer;
+ manager_->AddTaskObserver(&observer);
+ manager_->RemoveTaskObserver(&observer);
rmcilroy 2015/02/13 12:53:22 nit - could you add a test where the observer is r
Sami 2015/02/13 14:27:26 Good idea, done.
+
+ std::vector<int> run_order;
+ scoped_refptr<base::SingleThreadTaskRunner> runner =
+ manager_->TaskRunnerForQueue(0);
+
+ runner->PostTask(FROM_HERE, base::Bind(&TestTask, 1, &run_order));
+
+ selector_->AppendQueueToService(0);
+ test_task_runner_->RunUntilIdle();
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, observer.CallsToWillProcess());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, observer.CallsToDidProcess());
+}
+
} // namespace
} // namespace content

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698