C++11 Unit Test for RValue semantics.

C++11 Unit Test for RValue semantics.

Motivation:  test that these works on all possible bots and for all possible clients (clients do run these unit tests, right?)

Dear clients:  if this unit test fails, let us know!

BUG=skia:3427
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/3a6672ae0c95f24f873dca21424e060df9f9c3e5

[hal.canary, 2015-02-13 19:16:53]

The CQ bit was checked by halcanary@google.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-13 19:17:44]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/922043004/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-13 19:17:45]

Note for Reviewers:
The CQ is waiting for an approval.
If you believe that the CL is not ready yet, or if you would like to L-G-T-M
with comments then please uncheck the CQ checkbox.

Waiting for LGTM from valid reviewer(s) till 2015-02-14 01:17 UTC

[hal.canary, 2015-02-13 19:18:09]

The CQ bit was unchecked by halcanary@google.com

[hal.canary, 2015-02-13 19:29:09]

The CQ bit was checked by halcanary@google.com

[hal.canary, 2015-02-13 19:29:14]

Patchset #1 (id:1) has been deleted

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-13 19:29:55]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/922043004/20001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-13 19:29:55]

Note for Reviewers:
The CQ is waiting for an approval.
If you believe that the CL is not ready yet, or if you would like to L-G-T-M
with comments then please uncheck the CQ checkbox.

Waiting for LGTM from valid reviewer(s) till 2015-02-14 01:29 UTC

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-13 19:32:15]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-13 19:32:17]

Try jobs failed on following builders:
  Build-Ubuntu13.10-GCC4.8-x86_64-Release-Trybot on client.skia.compile
(JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/client.skia.compile/builders/Build-Ubuntu13.10-GC...)

[hal.canary, 2015-02-13 21:06:07]

The CQ bit was checked by halcanary@google.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-13 21:06:46]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/922043004/40001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-13 21:06:47]

Note for Reviewers:
The CQ is waiting for an approval.
If you believe that the CL is not ready yet, or if you would like to L-G-T-M
with comments then please uncheck the CQ checkbox.

Waiting for LGTM from valid reviewer(s) till 2015-02-14 03:06 UTC

[hal.canary, 2015-02-13 21:17:00]

The CQ bit was checked by halcanary@google.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-13 21:17:46]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/922043004/60001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-13 21:17:47]

Note for Reviewers:
The CQ is waiting for an approval.
If you believe that the CL is not ready yet, or if you would like to L-G-T-M
with comments then please uncheck the CQ checkbox.

Waiting for LGTM from valid reviewer(s) till 2015-02-14 03:17 UTC

[hal.canary, 2015-02-13 21:23:47]

halcanary@google.com changed reviewers:
+ mtklein@google.com

[hal.canary, 2015-02-13 21:23:53]

ptal

[hal.canary, 2015-02-13 22:55:23]

The CQ bit was checked by halcanary@google.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-13 22:56:07]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/922043004/100001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-13 22:56:08]

Note for Reviewers:
The CQ is waiting for an approval.
If you believe that the CL is not ready yet, or if you would like to L-G-T-M
with comments then please uncheck the CQ checkbox.

Waiting for LGTM from valid reviewer(s) till 2015-02-14 04:56 UTC

[mtklein, 2015-02-13 22:57:35]

lgtm

[hal.canary, 2015-02-13 23:05:04]

Patchset #4 (id:80001) has been deleted

[hal.canary, 2015-02-13 23:05:12]

Patchset #1 (id:20001) has been deleted

[hal.canary, 2015-02-13 23:05:20]

Patchset #1 (id:40001) has been deleted

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-13 23:12:56]

Committed patchset #5 (id:100001) as
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/3a6672ae0c95f24f873dca21424e060df9f9c3e5

[scroggo, 2015-02-18 14:51:56]

scroggo@google.com changed reviewers:
+ scroggo@google.com

[scroggo, 2015-02-18 14:51:57]

> Motivation:  test that these works on all possible bots and for all possible
> clients (clients do run these unit tests, right?)

Android framework build does not (we have bugs to start running them:
skbug.com/2454 and b/19015688).

Derek, does their build support this?

[mtklein, 2015-02-18 14:55:25]

Yeah, I guess I didn't read the CL clearly.  No clients run our unit tests
today.  This doesn't test anything but our bots.  If you want to see if you can
use C++11 in Skia, use C++11 in Skia.

[hal.canary, 2015-02-18 15:02:32]

On 2015/02/18 14:55:25, mtklein wrote:
> Yeah, I guess I didn't read the CL clearly.  No clients run our unit tests
> today.  This doesn't test anything but our bots.  If you want to see if you
can
> use C++11 in Skia, use C++11 in Skia.

A later CL will do that.  (An upgraded version of SkAutoTUnref)

[djsollen, 2015-02-18 15:43:53]

On 2015/02/18 15:34:34, djsollen wrote:

Our Android bots should have C++11 support.

[djsollen, 2015-02-18 15:43:54]

On 2015/02/18 15:34:34, djsollen wrote:

Our Android bots should have C++11 support.