platformKeys: Add per-extension sign permissions.

chrome/browser/chromeos/platform_keys/platform_keys_service.cc

Index: chrome/browser/chromeos/platform_keys/platform_keys_service.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/chromeos/platform_keys/platform_keys_service.cc b/chrome/browser/chromeos/platform_keys/platform_keys_service.cc
index 4f9eb1761d888a5fcf95cfc08cecab7a476c01ba..90b66f18e6fabd8db09d1b56d238f9d89fcc34ff 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/chromeos/platform_keys/platform_keys_service.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/chromeos/platform_keys/platform_keys_service.cc
@@ -17,18 +17,112 @@ using content::BrowserThread;
 
 namespace chromeos {
 
+struct PlatformKeysService::KeyEntry {
+  // The base64 encoded DER of a X.509 Subject Public Key Info.

[Andrew T Wilson (Slow), 2015/02/18 19:53:35]

Nit: "the..." -> "a base64-encoded DER"

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:40]

Done.

+  std::string spki_b64;
+
+  // True if the key can be used once for singing.
+  bool sign_once = false;

[kaliamoorthi, 2015/02/18 17:04:09]

Why do we have two bools for sign_once and sign_unlimited. This can result in
inconsistent state. How about an enum that eliminates these two bools or a
single variable sign_unlimited which when false implies sign once?

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:40]

These two permissions origin from the two different API platformKeys and
enterprise.platformKeys.
They're only used at a time if an extension would happen to use both for the
same key.

I added a more detailed explanation.

+
+  // True if the key can be used for signing unlimited often.

[Andrew T Wilson (Slow), 2015/02/18 19:53:35]

nit: "signing an unlimited number of times" - "unlimited often" sounds odd
because unlimited is an adjective, not an adverb.

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:39]

Done.

+  bool sign_unlimited = false;
+};
+
 namespace {
 
 const char kErrorKeyNotAllowedForSigning[] =
     "This key is not allowed for signing. Either it was used for signing "
     "before or it was not correctly generated.";
+
+// The key at which platform key specific data is stored in each extension's
+// state store.
+// From older versions of ChromeOS, this key can hold a list of base64 encoded

[Andrew T Wilson (Slow), 2015/02/18 19:53:34]

nit: base64-encoded

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:40]

Done.

+// SPKIs. A key can be used for signing at most once if it is part of that list
+// and removed from that list afterwards.
+//
+// The current format of data that is written to the PlatformKeys field is a
+// list of serialized KeyEntry objects:
+//   { 'SPKI': string ,
+//     'signOnce': bool ,
+//     'signUnlimited': bool
+//   }
+//
+// Do not change this constant as clients will lose their existing state.
 const char kStateStorePlatformKeys[] = "PlatformKeys";
+const char kStateStoreSPKI[] = "SPKI";
+const char kStateStoreSignOnce[] = "signOnce";
+const char kStateStoreSignUnlimited[] = "signUnlimited";
+
+scoped_ptr<PlatformKeysService::KeyEntries> KeyEntriesFromState(
+    const base::Value& state) {
+  scoped_ptr<PlatformKeysService::KeyEntries> new_entries(
+      new PlatformKeysService::KeyEntries);
+
+  const base::ListValue* entries = nullptr;
+  if (!state.GetAsList(&entries)) {
+    LOG(ERROR) << "Found a state store of wrong type.";
+    return new_entries.Pass();
+  }
+  for (const base::Value* entry : *entries) {
+    if (!entry) {
+      LOG(ERROR) << "Found invalid NULL entry in PlatformKeys state store.";
+      continue;
+    }
+
+    PlatformKeysService::KeyEntry new_entry;
+    const base::DictionaryValue* dict_entry = nullptr;
+    if (entry->GetAsString(&new_entry.spki_b64)) {

[Andrew T Wilson (Slow), 2015/02/18 19:53:35]

You talk about this above, but not bad to explain what is happening here in a
comment about old vs new state entries.

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:39]

Done.

+      new_entry.sign_once = true;
+    } else if (entry->GetAsDictionary(&dict_entry)) {
+      dict_entry->GetStringWithoutPathExpansion(kStateStoreSPKI,
+                                                &new_entry.spki_b64);
+      dict_entry->GetBooleanWithoutPathExpansion(kStateStoreSignOnce,
+                                                 &new_entry.sign_once);
+      dict_entry->GetBooleanWithoutPathExpansion(kStateStoreSignUnlimited,
+                                                 &new_entry.sign_unlimited);
+    } else {
+      LOG(ERROR) << "Found invalid entry of type " << entry->GetType()
+                 << " in PlatformKeys state store.";
+      continue;
+    }
+    new_entries->push_back(new_entry);
+  }
+  return new_entries.Pass();
+}
+
+scoped_ptr<base::ListValue> KeyEntriesToState(
+    const PlatformKeysService::KeyEntries& entries) {
+  scoped_ptr<base::ListValue> new_state(new base::ListValue);
+  for (const PlatformKeysService::KeyEntry& entry : entries) {
+    scoped_ptr<base::DictionaryValue> new_entry(new base::DictionaryValue);
+

[Andrew T Wilson (Slow), 2015/02/18 19:53:35]

nit:permissions, not premissions.

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:40]

Done.

+    // Drop entries that the extension doesn't have any premissions for anymore.
+    if (!entry.sign_once && !entry.sign_unlimited)

[kaliamoorthi, 2015/02/18 17:04:09]

Move this above the new.

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:39]

Done.

+      continue;
+    new_entry->SetStringWithoutPathExpansion(kStateStoreSPKI, entry.spki_b64);
+    if (entry.sign_once) {

[kaliamoorthi, 2015/02/18 17:04:09]

Is there a reason why the bool is written only when true?

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:40]

added a comment that defaults values are not stored.

+      new_entry->SetBooleanWithoutPathExpansion(kStateStoreSignOnce,
+                                                entry.sign_once);
+    }
+    if (entry.sign_unlimited) {
+      new_entry->SetBooleanWithoutPathExpansion(kStateStoreSignUnlimited,
+                                                entry.sign_unlimited);
+    }
+    new_state->Append(new_entry.release());
+  }
+  return new_state.Pass();
+}
 
-scoped_ptr<base::StringValue> GetPublicKeyValue(
-    const std::string& public_key_spki_der) {
-  std::string public_key_spki_der_b64;
-  base::Base64Encode(public_key_spki_der, &public_key_spki_der_b64);
-  return make_scoped_ptr(new base::StringValue(public_key_spki_der_b64));
+// Searches |platform_keys| for an entry for |public_key_spki_der_b64|. If found
+// returns a pointer to it, otherwise returns null.
+PlatformKeysService::KeyEntry* GetMatchingEntry(
+    const std::string& public_key_spki_der_b64,
+    PlatformKeysService::KeyEntries* platform_keys) {
+  for (PlatformKeysService::KeyEntry& entry : *platform_keys) {
+    if (entry.spki_b64 == public_key_spki_der_b64)

[Andrew T Wilson (Slow), 2015/02/18 19:53:35]

Thing to remember here is that DER encodings are not canonical. I think it
doesn't matter here, but I've been bitten by this before, trying to compare two
identical keys by their DER and having it fail so wanted to point it out.

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:40]

Good point. I added a clarification that DER is actually unique (thanks
Wikipedia :-) )

+      return &entry;
+  }
+  return nullptr;
 }
 
 }  // namespace
@@ -55,14 +149,16 @@ class PlatformKeysService::PermissionUpdateTask : public Task {
   // Creates a task that reads the current permission for an extension to access
   // a certain key. Afterwards it updates and persists the permission to the new
   // value |new_permission_value|. |callback| will be run after the permission
-  // was persisted. The old permission value is then accessible through
-  // old_permission_value().
-  PermissionUpdateTask(const bool new_permission_value,
+  // was persisted. The old permission values are then available through
+  // old_key_entry().
+  PermissionUpdateTask(const SignPermission permission,
+                       const bool new_permission_value,
                        const std::string& public_key_spki_der,
                        const std::string& extension_id,
                        base::Callback<void(Task*)> callback,
                        PlatformKeysService* service)
-      : new_permission_value_(new_permission_value),
+      : permission_(permission),
+        new_permission_value_(new_permission_value),
         public_key_spki_der_(public_key_spki_der),
         extension_id_(extension_id),
         callback_(callback),
@@ -78,9 +174,8 @@ class PlatformKeysService::PermissionUpdateTask : public Task {
 
   bool IsDone() override { return next_step_ == Step::DONE; }
 
-  // The original permission value before setting the new value
-  // |new_permission_value|.
-  bool old_permission_value() { return old_permission_value_; }
+  // The original key entry before setting the new value |new_permission_value|.

[kaliamoorthi, 2015/02/18 17:04:09]

This is confusing, original key entry and new permission value. Please make
consistent.

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:40]

Done.

+  const KeyEntry& old_key_entry() { return old_key_entry_; }
 
  private:
   void DoStep() {
@@ -113,38 +208,59 @@ class PlatformKeysService::PermissionUpdateTask : public Task {
                                   weak_factory_.GetWeakPtr()));
   }
 
-  void GotPlatformKeys(scoped_ptr<base::ListValue> platform_keys) {
+  void GotPlatformKeys(scoped_ptr<KeyEntries> platform_keys) {
     platform_keys_ = platform_keys.Pass();
     DoStep();
   }
 
-  // Returns whether the extension has permission to use the key for signing
-  // according to the PlatformKeys value read from the extensions state store.
-  // Invalidates the key if it was found to be valid.
+  // Persists the existing KeyEntry in |old_key_entry_|, updates the entry with
+  // the new permission and persists it to the extension's state store if it was
+  // changed.
   void WriteUpdate() {
-    scoped_ptr<base::StringValue> key_value(
-        GetPublicKeyValue(public_key_spki_der_));
-
-    base::ListValue::const_iterator it = platform_keys_->Find(*key_value);
-    old_permission_value_ = it != platform_keys_->end();
-    if (old_permission_value_ == new_permission_value_)
-      return;
-
-    if (new_permission_value_)
-      platform_keys_->Append(key_value.release());
-    else
-      platform_keys_->Remove(*key_value, nullptr);
+    DCHECK(platform_keys_);
+
+    std::string public_key_spki_der_b64;
+    base::Base64Encode(public_key_spki_der_, &public_key_spki_der_b64);
+
+    KeyEntry* matching_entry =
+        GetMatchingEntry(public_key_spki_der_b64, platform_keys_.get());
+
+    if (!matching_entry) {
+      platform_keys_->push_back(KeyEntry());
+      matching_entry = &platform_keys_->back();
+      matching_entry->spki_b64 = public_key_spki_der_b64;
+    } else if (permission_ == SignPermission::ONCE && new_permission_value_) {
+      // The one-time sign permission is supposed to be granted once per key
+      // during generation. Generated keys should be unique and thus this case
+      // should never occur.
+      LOG(ERROR) << "Requested one-time sign permission on existing key.";

[Andrew T Wilson (Slow), 2015/02/18 19:53:34]

Should this be a CHECK()? Or at least a DCHECK()? Or can this happen due to an
extension misusing the API?

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:40]

'should never occur'... so DCHECK (according to the wisdom of our chormium style
guide).

+    }
+    old_key_entry_ = *matching_entry;
+
+    bool* permission_value = nullptr;
+    switch (permission_) {
+      case SignPermission::ONCE:
+        permission_value = &matching_entry->sign_once;
+        break;
+      case SignPermission::UNLIMITED:
+        permission_value = &matching_entry->sign_unlimited;
+        break;
+    }

[kaliamoorthi, 2015/02/18 17:04:09]

Should there be a default unreached(); return here?

I get this is an enum and all but it is better to be defensive.

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:40]

The defensive thing is to not use default.
As it is, the compiler can check whether all enum values are covered. If not it
fails to compile.

 
-    service_->SetPlatformKeysOfExtension(extension_id_, platform_keys_.Pass());
+    if (*permission_value != new_permission_value_) {
+      *permission_value = new_permission_value_;
+      service_->SetPlatformKeysOfExtension(extension_id_, *platform_keys_);
+    }
   }
 
   Step next_step_ = Step::READ_PLATFORM_KEYS;
-  scoped_ptr<base::ListValue> platform_keys_;
-  bool old_permission_value_ = false;
+  KeyEntry old_key_entry_;
 
+  const SignPermission permission_;
   const bool new_permission_value_;
   const std::string public_key_spki_der_;
   const std::string extension_id_;
+  scoped_ptr<KeyEntries> platform_keys_;
   base::Callback<void(Task*)> callback_;
   PlatformKeysService* const service_;
   base::WeakPtrFactory<PermissionUpdateTask> weak_factory_;
@@ -198,17 +314,21 @@ class PlatformKeysService::SignTask : public Task {
         next_step_ = Step::SIGN_OR_ABORT;
         UpdatePermission();
         return;
-      case Step::SIGN_OR_ABORT:
+      case Step::SIGN_OR_ABORT: {
         next_step_ = Step::DONE;
-        if (!service_->permission_check_enabled_ ||
-            permission_update_->old_permission_value()) {
+        bool sign_granted = permission_update_->old_key_entry().sign_once ||
+                            permission_update_->old_key_entry().sign_unlimited;
+        if (sign_granted) {
           Sign();
         } else {
-          callback_.Run(std::string() /* no signature */,
-                        kErrorKeyNotAllowedForSigning);
+          if (!callback_.is_null()) {

[Andrew T Wilson (Slow), 2015/02/18 19:53:35]

Is this necessary? I thought calling Run() on a null callback was a no-op?

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:40]

no it's not:

CallbackBase::CallbackBase(BindStateBase* bind_state)
    : bind_state_(bind_state),
      polymorphic_invoke_(NULL) {...}

class Callback ... {
  Callback() : CallbackBase(NULL) { }

  R Run(...) {
    PolymorphicInvoke f =
        reinterpret_cast<PolymorphicInvoke>(polymorphic_invoke_);

    return f(bind_state_.get(), internal::CallbackForward(args)...);
  }
}

+            callback_.Run(std::string() /* no signature */,
+                          kErrorKeyNotAllowedForSigning);
+          }
           DoStep();
         }
         return;
+      }
       case Step::DONE:
         service_->TaskFinished(this);
         // |this| might be invalid now.
@@ -221,7 +341,8 @@ class PlatformKeysService::SignTask : public Task {
   // signing operations with that key.
   void UpdatePermission() {
     permission_update_.reset(new PermissionUpdateTask(
-        false /* new permission value */, public_key_, extension_id_,
+        SignPermission::ONCE, false /* new permission value */, public_key_,
+        extension_id_,
         base::Bind(&SignTask::DidUpdatePermission, weak_factory_.GetWeakPtr()),
         service_));
     permission_update_->Start();
@@ -251,7 +372,7 @@ class PlatformKeysService::SignTask : public Task {
   }
 
   Step next_step_ = Step::UPDATE_PERMISSION;
-  scoped_ptr<base::ListValue> platform_keys_;
+  scoped_ptr<KeyEntries> platform_keys_;
   scoped_ptr<PermissionUpdateTask> permission_update_;
 
   const std::string token_id_;
@@ -271,6 +392,209 @@ class PlatformKeysService::SignTask : public Task {
   DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(SignTask);
 };
 
+class PlatformKeysService::SelectTask : public Task {
+ public:
+  enum class Step {
+    GET_MATCHING_CERTS,
+    SELECT_CERTS,
+    READ_PLATFORM_KEYS,
+    UPDATE_PERMISSION,
+    FILTER_BY_PERMISSIONS,
+    DONE,
+  };
+
+  // This task determines all known client certs matching |request|. If
+  // |interactive| is true, calls |service->select_delegate_->Select()| to
+  // select a cert from all matches. The extension with |extension_id| will be
+  // granted unlimited sign permission for the selected cert.
+  // Finally, either the selection or, if |interactive| is false, matching certs
+  // that the extension has permission for are passed to |callback|.
+  SelectTask(const platform_keys::ClientCertificateRequest& request,
+             bool interactive,
+             const std::string& extension_id,
+             const SelectCertificatesCallback& callback,
+             PlatformKeysService* service)
+      : request_(request),
+        interactive_(interactive),
+        extension_id_(extension_id),
+        callback_(callback),
+        service_(service),
+        weak_factory_(this) {}
+  ~SelectTask() override {}
+
+  void Start() override {
+    CHECK(next_step_ == Step::GET_MATCHING_CERTS);
+    DoStep();
+  }
+  bool IsDone() override { return next_step_ == Step::DONE; }
+
+ private:
+  void DoStep() {
+    switch (next_step_) {
+      case Step::GET_MATCHING_CERTS:
+        next_step_ = Step::SELECT_CERTS;
+        GetMatchingCerts();
+        return;
+      case Step::SELECT_CERTS:
+        next_step_ = Step::UPDATE_PERMISSION;
+        SelectCerts();
+        return;
+      case Step::UPDATE_PERMISSION:
+        next_step_ = Step::READ_PLATFORM_KEYS;
+        UpdatePermission();
+        return;
+      case Step::READ_PLATFORM_KEYS:
+        next_step_ = Step::FILTER_BY_PERMISSIONS;
+        ReadPlatformKeys();
+        return;
+      case Step::FILTER_BY_PERMISSIONS:
+        next_step_ = Step::DONE;
+        FilterSelectionByPermission();
+        return;
+      case Step::DONE:
+        service_->TaskFinished(this);
+        // |this| might be invalid now.
+        return;
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Retrieves all certificates matching |request_|. Will call back to
+  // |GotMatchingCerts()|.
+  void GetMatchingCerts() {
+    platform_keys::subtle::SelectClientCertificates(
+        request_,
+        base::Bind(&SelectTask::GotMatchingCerts, weak_factory_.GetWeakPtr()),
+        service_->browser_context_);
+  }
+
+  // If the certificate request could be processed successfully, |matches| will
+  // contain the list of matching certificates (maybe empty) and |error_message|
+  // will be empty. If an error occurred, |matches| will be null and
+  // |error_message| contain an error message.
+  void GotMatchingCerts(scoped_ptr<net::CertificateList> matches,
+                        const std::string& error_message) {
+    if (!error_message.empty()) {
+      next_step_ = Step::DONE;
+      callback_.Run(nullptr /* no certificates */, error_message);
+      DoStep();
+      return;
+    }
+    matches_.swap(*matches);
+    DoStep();
+  }
+
+  // If |interactive_|, calls |service_->select_delegate_->Select()| to select a
+  // cert from |matches_|, which will be stored in |selected_cert_|.
+  // Will call back to |GotSelection()|.
+  void SelectCerts() {
+    if (!interactive_ || matches_.empty()) {

[kaliamoorthi, 2015/02/18 17:04:09]

This seem to unnecessarily continue through the rest of the states. I guess
UpdatePermission can be skipped in this situation that may eliminate the check
for interactive_ again in UpdatePermission.

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:40]

I did this to make the transitions as constant as possible.
I changed it to skip both steps, see the modification of Step().
Actually that's rather readable as it's well documented now in Step().

+      // Don't show a select dialog in non-interactive calls or if no
+      // certificate is matching.
+      DoStep();
+      return;
+    }
+    service_->select_delegate_->Select(
+        extension_id_, matches_,
+        base::Bind(&SelectTask::GotSelection, base::Unretained(this)));
+  }
+
+  // Will be called by |SelectCerts()| with the selected cert or null if no cert
+  // was selected.
+  void GotSelection(scoped_refptr<net::X509Certificate> selected_cert) {
+    selected_cert_ = selected_cert;
+    DoStep();
+  }
+
+  // Updates the extension's state store about unlimited sign permission for the
+  // selected cert. Does nothing if no cert was selected or if |interactive_| is
+  // false.
+  // Will call back to |DidUpdatePermission()|.
+  void UpdatePermission() {
+    if (!interactive_ || !selected_cert_) {
+      DoStep();
+      return;
+    }
+    const std::string public_key_spki_der(
+        platform_keys::GetSubjectPublicKeyInfo(selected_cert_));
+    permission_update_.reset(new PermissionUpdateTask(
+        SignPermission::UNLIMITED, true /* new permission value */,
+        public_key_spki_der, extension_id_,
+        base::Bind(&SelectTask::DidUpdatePermission, base::Unretained(this)),
+        service_));
+    permission_update_->Start();
+  }
+
+  void DidUpdatePermission(Task* /* task */) { DoStep(); }
+
+  // Reads the PlatformKeys value from the extension's state store and calls
+  // back to GotPlatformKeys().
+  void ReadPlatformKeys() {
+    service_->GetPlatformKeysOfExtension(
+        extension_id_,
+        base::Bind(&SelectTask::GotPlatformKeys, weak_factory_.GetWeakPtr()));
+  }
+
+  void GotPlatformKeys(scoped_ptr<KeyEntries> platform_keys) {
+    platform_keys_ = platform_keys.Pass();
+    DoStep();
+  }
+
+  // Filters from all matches (if not interactive) or from the selection (if
+  // interactive), the certificates that the extension has unlimited sign
+  // permission for. Passes the filtered certs to |callback_|.
+  // Note: In the interactive case this should filter exactly the selected cert
+  // and checking the permissions again is not striclty necessary. However, by
+  // running the filtering additionally, ensures that the permissions were
+  // updated correctly.

[Andrew T Wilson (Slow), 2015/02/18 19:53:35]

What does "ensures that the permissions were updated correctly" mean? You don't
have a CHECK or DCHECK for this case below, it appears - if there's a bug in the
update permissions code, the end result will be that the user selects a cert but
the extension never sees it. Seems like if we ever encounter this situation
(interactive_ && selected_cert_ && filtered_certs->empty()) it seems like a
logic error that should be flagged?

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:40]

Done.

+  void FilterSelectionByPermission() {
+    scoped_ptr<net::CertificateList> selection(new net::CertificateList);
+    if (interactive_) {
+      if (selected_cert_)
+        selection->push_back(selected_cert_);
+    } else {
+      selection->assign(matches_.begin(), matches_.end());
+    }
+
+    scoped_ptr<net::CertificateList> filtered_certs(new net::CertificateList);
+    for (scoped_refptr<net::X509Certificate> selected_cert : *selection) {
+      const std::string public_key_spki_der(
+          platform_keys::GetSubjectPublicKeyInfo(selected_cert));
+      std::string public_key_spki_der_b64;
+      base::Base64Encode(public_key_spki_der, &public_key_spki_der_b64);
+
+      KeyEntry* matching_entry =
+          GetMatchingEntry(public_key_spki_der_b64, platform_keys_.get());
+      if (!matching_entry || !matching_entry->sign_unlimited)
+        continue;
+
+      filtered_certs->push_back(selected_cert);
+    }
+    callback_.Run(filtered_certs.Pass(), std::string() /* no error */);
+    DoStep();
+  }
+
+  Step next_step_ = Step::GET_MATCHING_CERTS;
+  scoped_ptr<KeyEntries> platform_keys_;
+  scoped_ptr<PermissionUpdateTask> permission_update_;
+
+  net::CertificateList matches_;
+  scoped_refptr<net::X509Certificate> selected_cert_;
+  platform_keys::ClientCertificateRequest request_;
+  const bool interactive_;
+  const std::string extension_id_;
+  const SelectCertificatesCallback callback_;
+  PlatformKeysService* const service_;
+  base::WeakPtrFactory<SelectTask> weak_factory_;
+
+  DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(SelectTask);
+};
+
+PlatformKeysService::SelectDelegate::SelectDelegate() {
+}
+
+PlatformKeysService::SelectDelegate::~SelectDelegate() {
+}
+
 PlatformKeysService::PlatformKeysService(
     content::BrowserContext* browser_context,
     extensions::StateStore* state_store)
@@ -283,8 +607,22 @@ PlatformKeysService::PlatformKeysService(
 PlatformKeysService::~PlatformKeysService() {
 }
 
-void PlatformKeysService::DisablePermissionCheckForTesting() {
-  permission_check_enabled_ = false;
+void PlatformKeysService::SetSelectDelegate(
+    scoped_ptr<SelectDelegate> delegate) {
+  select_delegate_ = delegate.Pass();

[Andrew T Wilson (Slow), 2015/02/18 19:53:35]

DCHECK(interactive_) might be appropriate here? Or get rid of interactive_
entirely as Prabhu suggests?

Also, perhaps DCHECK(!select_delegate_) would be useful to ensure that we aren't
setting the delegate twice? Not sure what the contract is around this.

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:39]

There's some confusion about the scoped of interactive_ and select_delegate_.

The delegate is set once (e.g. in the factory) and lives up-to the destruction
of PlatformKeysService.

interactive is a property of a single SelectClientCertificate call, of which
there can be many during the lifetime of PlatformKeysService.
Some of these calls can be interactive some non-interactive.

The delegate is never used for non-interactive calls but might be used for
interactive ones.

+}
+
+void PlatformKeysService::GrantUnlimitedSignPermission(
+    const std::string& extension_id,
+    scoped_refptr<net::X509Certificate> cert) {
+  const std::string public_key_spki_der(
+      platform_keys::GetSubjectPublicKeyInfo(cert));
+
+  StartOrQueueTask(make_scoped_ptr(new PermissionUpdateTask(
+      SignPermission::UNLIMITED, true /* new permission value */,
+      public_key_spki_der, extension_id,
+      base::Bind(&PlatformKeysService::TaskFinished, base::Unretained(this)),
+      this)));
 }
 
 void PlatformKeysService::GenerateRSAKey(const std::string& token_id,
@@ -326,15 +664,12 @@ void PlatformKeysService::SignRSAPKCS1Raw(const std::string& token_id,
 
 void PlatformKeysService::SelectClientCertificates(
     const platform_keys::ClientCertificateRequest& request,
+    bool interactive,

[kaliamoorthi, 2015/02/18 17:04:09]

Can't you deduce this by the fact that SelectDelegate is set or not? Having
additional flag leaves room for making a mistake. 

[pneubeck (no reviews), 2015/02/19 11:08:40]

see reply to Drew's comment above.

     const std::string& extension_id,
     const SelectCertificatesCallback& callback) {
   DCHECK(BrowserThread::CurrentlyOn(BrowserThread::UI));
-
-  platform_keys::subtle::SelectClientCertificates(
-      request,
-      base::Bind(&PlatformKeysService::SelectClientCertificatesCallback,
-                 weak_factory_.GetWeakPtr(), extension_id, callback),
-      browser_context_);
+  StartOrQueueTask(make_scoped_ptr(
+      new SelectTask(request, interactive, extension_id, callback, this)));
 }
 
 void PlatformKeysService::StartOrQueueTask(scoped_ptr<Task> task) {
@@ -367,9 +702,9 @@ void PlatformKeysService::GetPlatformKeysOfExtension(
 
 void PlatformKeysService::SetPlatformKeysOfExtension(
     const std::string& extension_id,
-    scoped_ptr<base::ListValue> platform_keys) {
+    const KeyEntries& platform_keys) {
   state_store_->SetExtensionValue(extension_id, kStateStorePlatformKeys,
-                                  platform_keys.Pass());
+                                  KeyEntriesToState(platform_keys));
 }
 
 void PlatformKeysService::GeneratedKey(const std::string& extension_id,
@@ -382,7 +717,8 @@ void PlatformKeysService::GeneratedKey(const std::string& extension_id,
   }
 
   StartOrQueueTask(make_scoped_ptr(new PermissionUpdateTask(
-      true /* new permission value */, public_key_spki_der, extension_id,
+      SignPermission::ONCE, true /* new permission value */,
+      public_key_spki_der, extension_id,
       base::Bind(&PlatformKeysService::RegisteredGeneratedKey,
                  base::Unretained(this), callback, public_key_spki_der),
       this)));
@@ -396,35 +732,16 @@ void PlatformKeysService::RegisteredGeneratedKey(
   TaskFinished(task);
 }
 
-void PlatformKeysService::SelectClientCertificatesCallback(
-    const std::string& extension_id,
-    const SelectCertificatesCallback& callback,
-    scoped_ptr<net::CertificateList> matches,
-    const std::string& error_message) {
-  if (permission_check_enabled_)
-    matches->clear();
-
-  // TODO(pneubeck): Remove all certs that the extension doesn't have access to.
-  callback.Run(matches.Pass(), error_message);
-}
 
 void PlatformKeysService::GotPlatformKeysOfExtension(
     const std::string& extension_id,
     const GetPlatformKeysCallback& callback,
     scoped_ptr<base::Value> value) {
-  if (!value)
-    value.reset(new base::ListValue);
-
-  base::ListValue* keys = NULL;
-  if (!value->GetAsList(&keys)) {
-    LOG(ERROR) << "Found a value of wrong type.";
-
-    keys = new base::ListValue;
-    value.reset(keys);
-  }
+  scoped_ptr<KeyEntries> key_entries(new KeyEntries);
+  if (value)
+    key_entries = KeyEntriesFromState(*value);
 
-  ignore_result(value.release());
-  callback.Run(make_scoped_ptr(keys));
+  callback.Run(key_entries.Pass());
 }
 
 }  // namespace chromeos