Add a HostContentSettingsMap layer for Supervised Users.

chrome/test/base/testing_profile.cc

Index: chrome/test/base/testing_profile.cc
diff --git a/chrome/test/base/testing_profile.cc b/chrome/test/base/testing_profile.cc
index 3f5e7e69121538c976a76782667b3ba9bf21b1b6..953b21f96a42300f41c5692b47ecd46bdd9de867 100644
--- a/chrome/test/base/testing_profile.cc
+++ b/chrome/test/base/testing_profile.cc
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@
 #endif
 
 #if defined(ENABLE_SUPERVISED_USERS)
+#include "chrome/browser/content_settings/content_settings_supervised_provider.h"
 #include "chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_constants.h"
 #include "chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_settings_service.h"
 #include "chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_settings_service_factory.h"
@@ -919,6 +920,18 @@ HostContentSettingsMap* TestingProfile::GetHostContentSettingsMap() {
           host_content_settings_map_.get());
     }
 #endif
+#if defined(ENABLE_SUPERVISED_USERS)
+    SupervisedUserSettingsService* supervised_service =

[Bernhard Bauer, 2015/02/26 18:03:54]

Hm... I'm not sure if a testing profile actually needs this layer in the HCSM.
If no tests rely on it, I would be tempted to remove it.

[knn, 2015/02/27 10:43:53]

Removed as there are no tests testing supervised users and HCSM.

+        SupervisedUserSettingsServiceFactory::GetForProfile(this);
+    scoped_ptr<content_settings::SupervisedProvider> supervised_provider(
+        new content_settings::SupervisedProvider());
+    supervised_service->Subscribe(base::Bind(
+        &content_settings::SupervisedProvider::OnSupervisedSettingsAvailable,
+        base::Unretained(supervised_provider.get())));
+    host_content_settings_map_->RegisterProvider(
+        HostContentSettingsMap::SUPERVISED_PROVIDER,
+        supervised_provider.Pass());
+#endif
   }
   return host_content_settings_map_.get();
 }