Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1751)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/autocomplete/scored_history_match_builder_impl.cc

Issue 896983003: Componentize ScoredHistoryMatch (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Use base::saturated_cast<> to convert from float to int Created 5 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: chrome/browser/autocomplete/scored_history_match_builder_impl.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/history/scored_history_match.cc b/chrome/browser/autocomplete/scored_history_match_builder_impl.cc
similarity index 55%
rename from chrome/browser/history/scored_history_match.cc
rename to chrome/browser/autocomplete/scored_history_match_builder_impl.cc
index 1f1184c859273b31a94a901238661ce72bd018d8..ceb1fb990773e5fbec68a97dfbbea808414ae3f8 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/history/scored_history_match.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/autocomplete/scored_history_match_builder_impl.cc
@@ -2,68 +2,155 @@
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
// found in the LICENSE file.
-#include "chrome/browser/history/scored_history_match.h"
-
-#include <algorithm>
-#include <functional>
-#include <iterator>
-#include <numeric>
-#include <set>
+#include "chrome/browser/autocomplete/scored_history_match_builder_impl.h"
#include <math.h>
+#include <algorithm>
+#include <vector>
+
#include "base/logging.h"
#include "base/metrics/histogram.h"
+#include "base/numerics/safe_conversions.h"
#include "base/strings/string_util.h"
#include "base/strings/utf_string_conversions.h"
#include "chrome/browser/autocomplete/history_url_provider.h"
+#include "components/bookmarks/browser/bookmark_model.h"
#include "components/bookmarks/browser/bookmark_utils.h"
#include "components/history/core/browser/history_client.h"
#include "components/omnibox/omnibox_field_trial.h"
#include "components/omnibox/url_prefix.h"
#include "content/public/browser/browser_thread.h"
-namespace history {
+namespace {
+
+// The number of days of recency scores to precompute.
+const int kDaysToPrecomputeRecencyScoresFor = 366;
+
+// The number of raw term score buckets use; raw term scores greater this are
+// capped at the score of the largest bucket.
+const int kMaxRawTermScore = 30;
+
+// If true, assign raw scores to be max(whatever it normally would be, a score
+// that's similar to the score HistoryURL provider would assign). This variable
+// is set in the constructor by examining the field trial state.
+const bool kAlsoDoHupLikeScoring = false;
+
+// Pre-computed information to speed up calculating recency scores.
+// |days_ago_to_recency_score| is a simple array mapping how long ago a page was
+// visited (in days) to the recency score we should assign it. This allows easy
+// lookups of scores without requiring math. This is initialized by
+// InitDaysAgoToRecencyScoreArray called by
+// ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl::Init().
+float days_ago_to_recency_score[kDaysToPrecomputeRecencyScoresFor];
+
+// Pre-computed information to speed up calculating topicality scores.
+// |raw_term_score_to_topicality_score| is a simple array mapping how raw terms
+// scores (a weighted sum of the number of hits for the term, weighted by how
+// important the hit is: hostname, path, etc.) to the topicality score we should
+// assign it. This allows easy lookups of scores without requiring math. This
+// is initialized by InitRawTermScoreToTopicalityScoreArray() called from
+// ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl::Init().
+float raw_term_score_to_topicality_score[kMaxRawTermScore];
+
+// The maximum score that can be assigned to non-inlineable matches. This is
+// useful because often we want inlineable matches to come first (even if they
+// don't sometimes score as well as non-inlineable matches) because if a
+// non-inlineable match comes first than all matches will get demoted later in
+// HistoryQuickProvider to non-inlineable scores. Set to -1 to indicate no
+// maximum score.
+int max_assigned_score_for_non_inlineable_matches = -1;
+
+// Whether ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl::Init() has been called.
+bool initialized = false;
+
+// Precalculates raw_term_score_to_topicality_score, used in
+// GetTopicalityScore().
+void InitRawTermScoreToTopicalityScoreArray() {
+ for (int term_score = 0; term_score < kMaxRawTermScore; ++term_score) {
+ float topicality_score;
+ if (term_score < 10) {
+ // If the term scores less than 10 points (no full-credit hit, or
+ // no combination of hits that score that well), then the topicality
+ // score is linear in the term score.
+ topicality_score = 0.1 * term_score;
+ } else {
+ // For term scores of at least ten points, pass them through a log
+ // function so a score of 10 points gets a 1.0 (to meet up exactly
+ // with the linear component) and increases logarithmically until
+ // maxing out at 30 points, with computes to a score around 2.1.
+ topicality_score = (1.0 + 2.25 * log10(0.1 * term_score));
+ }
+ raw_term_score_to_topicality_score[term_score] = topicality_score;
+ }
+}
-// ScoredHistoryMatch ----------------------------------------------------------
+// Pre-calculates days_ago_to_recency_score, used in GetRecencyScore().
+void InitDaysAgoToRecencyScoreArray() {
+ for (int days_ago = 0; days_ago < kDaysToPrecomputeRecencyScoresFor;
+ days_ago++) {
+ int unnormalized_recency_score;
+ if (days_ago <= 4) {
+ unnormalized_recency_score = 100;
+ } else if (days_ago <= 14) {
+ // Linearly extrapolate between 4 and 14 days so 14 days has a score
+ // of 70.
+ unnormalized_recency_score = 70 + (14 - days_ago) * (100 - 70) / (14 - 4);
+ } else if (days_ago <= 31) {
+ // Linearly extrapolate between 14 and 31 days so 31 days has a score
+ // of 50.
+ unnormalized_recency_score = 50 + (31 - days_ago) * (70 - 50) / (31 - 14);
+ } else if (days_ago <= 90) {
+ // Linearly extrapolate between 30 and 90 days so 90 days has a score
+ // of 30.
+ unnormalized_recency_score = 30 + (90 - days_ago) * (50 - 30) / (90 - 30);
+ } else {
+ // Linearly extrapolate between 90 and 365 days so 365 days has a score
+ // of 10.
+ unnormalized_recency_score =
+ 10 + (365 - days_ago) * (20 - 10) / (365 - 90);
+ }
+ days_ago_to_recency_score[days_ago] = unnormalized_recency_score / 100.0;
+ if (days_ago > 0) {
+ DCHECK_LE(days_ago_to_recency_score[days_ago],
+ days_ago_to_recency_score[days_ago - 1]);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+} // namespace
// static
-const size_t ScoredHistoryMatch::kMaxVisitsToScore = 10;
-const int ScoredHistoryMatch::kDaysToPrecomputeRecencyScoresFor = 366;
-const int ScoredHistoryMatch::kMaxRawTermScore = 30;
-float* ScoredHistoryMatch::raw_term_score_to_topicality_score_ = NULL;
-float* ScoredHistoryMatch::days_ago_to_recency_score_ = NULL;
-bool ScoredHistoryMatch::initialized_ = false;
-int ScoredHistoryMatch::bookmark_value_ = 1;
-bool ScoredHistoryMatch::allow_tld_matches_ = false;
-bool ScoredHistoryMatch::allow_scheme_matches_ = false;
-bool ScoredHistoryMatch::also_do_hup_like_scoring_ = false;
-int ScoredHistoryMatch::max_assigned_score_for_non_inlineable_matches_ = -1;
-
-ScoredHistoryMatch::ScoredHistoryMatch()
- : raw_score_(0),
- can_inline_(false) {
+int ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl::bookmark_value_ = 1;
+bool ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl::allow_tld_matches_ = false;
+bool ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl::allow_scheme_matches_ = false;
+
+ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl::ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl(
+ const IsBookmarkedCallback& is_bookmarked)
+ : is_bookmarked_(is_bookmarked) {
Init();
}
-ScoredHistoryMatch::ScoredHistoryMatch(
- const URLRow& row,
- const VisitInfoVector& visits,
+ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl::~ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl() {
+}
+
+history::ScoredHistoryMatch ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl::Build(
+ const history::URLRow& row,
+ const history::VisitInfoVector& visits,
const std::string& languages,
const base::string16& lower_string,
- const String16Vector& terms,
- const WordStarts& terms_to_word_starts_offsets,
- const RowWordStarts& word_starts,
- const base::Time now,
- HistoryClient* history_client)
- : HistoryMatch(row, 0, false, false),
- raw_score_(0),
- can_inline_(false) {
- Init();
+ const history::String16Vector& terms,
+ const history::WordStarts& terms_to_word_starts_offsets,
+ const history::RowWordStarts& word_starts,
+ const base::Time now) const {
+ history::ScoredHistoryMatch scored_history_match =
+ history::ScoredHistoryMatch(row, 0, false, false, 0,
+ history::TermMatches(),
+ history::TermMatches(), false);
GURL gurl = row.url();
if (!gurl.is_valid())
- return;
+ return scored_history_match;
// Figure out where each search term appears in the URL and/or page title
// so that we can score as well as provide autocomplete highlighting.
@@ -72,17 +159,22 @@ ScoredHistoryMatch::ScoredHistoryMatch(
bookmarks::CleanUpUrlForMatching(gurl, languages, &adjustments);
base::string16 title = bookmarks::CleanUpTitleForMatching(row.title());
int term_num = 0;
- for (String16Vector::const_iterator iter = terms.begin(); iter != terms.end();
- ++iter, ++term_num) {
- base::string16 term = *iter;
- TermMatches url_term_matches = MatchTermInString(term, url, term_num);
- TermMatches title_term_matches = MatchTermInString(term, title, term_num);
- if (url_term_matches.empty() && title_term_matches.empty())
- return; // A term was not found in either URL or title - reject.
- url_matches_.insert(url_matches_.end(), url_term_matches.begin(),
- url_term_matches.end());
- title_matches_.insert(title_matches_.end(), title_term_matches.begin(),
- title_term_matches.end());
+ for (const auto& term : terms) {
+ history::TermMatches url_term_matches =
+ history::MatchTermInString(term, url, term_num);
+ history::TermMatches title_term_matches =
+ history::MatchTermInString(term, title, term_num);
+ if (url_term_matches.empty() && title_term_matches.empty()) {
+ // A term was not found in either URL or title - reject.
+ return scored_history_match;
+ }
+ scored_history_match.url_matches.insert(
+ scored_history_match.url_matches.end(), url_term_matches.begin(),
+ url_term_matches.end());
+ scored_history_match.title_matches.insert(
+ scored_history_match.title_matches.end(), title_term_matches.begin(),
+ title_term_matches.end());
+ ++term_num;
}
// Sort matches by offset and eliminate any which overlap.
@@ -91,8 +183,10 @@ ScoredHistoryMatch::ScoredHistoryMatch(
// overlaps and sorting is needed to decide what to highlight in the
// suggestion string. But this sort and de-overlap doesn't have to
// be done before scoring.)
- url_matches_ = SortAndDeoverlapMatches(url_matches_);
- title_matches_ = SortAndDeoverlapMatches(title_matches_);
+ scored_history_match.url_matches =
+ SortAndDeoverlapMatches(scored_history_match.url_matches);
+ scored_history_match.title_matches =
+ SortAndDeoverlapMatches(scored_history_match.title_matches);
// We can inline autocomplete a match if:
// 1) there is only one search term
@@ -108,64 +202,62 @@ ScoredHistoryMatch::ScoredHistoryMatch(
// prefixes match, we'll choose to inline following the longest one.
// For a URL like "http://www.washingtonmutual.com", this means
// typing "w" will inline "ashington..." instead of "ww.washington...".
- const URLPrefix* best_inlineable_prefix =
- (!url_matches_.empty() && (terms.size() == 1)) ?
- URLPrefix::BestURLPrefix(base::UTF8ToUTF16(gurl.spec()), terms[0]) :
- NULL;
- can_inline_ = (best_inlineable_prefix != NULL) &&
- !IsWhitespace(*(lower_string.rbegin()));
- if (can_inline_) {
- // Initialize innermost_match.
- // The idea here is that matches that occur in the scheme or
- // "www." are worse than matches which don't. For the URLs
- // "http://www.google.com" and "http://wellsfargo.com", we want
- // the omnibox input "w" to cause the latter URL to rank higher
- // than the former. Note that this is not the same as checking
- // whether one match's inlinable prefix has more components than
- // the other match's, since in this example, both matches would
- // have an inlinable prefix of "http://", which is one component.
- //
- // Instead, we look for the overall best (i.e., most components)
- // prefix of the current URL, and then check whether the inlinable
- // prefix has that many components. If it does, this is an
- // "innermost" match, and should be boosted. In the example
- // above, the best prefixes for the two URLs have two and one
- // components respectively, while the inlinable prefixes each
- // have one component; this means the first match is not innermost
- // and the second match is innermost, resulting in us boosting the
- // second match.
- //
- // Now, the code that implements this.
- // The deepest prefix for this URL regardless of where the match is.
- const URLPrefix* best_prefix = URLPrefix::BestURLPrefix(
- base::UTF8ToUTF16(gurl.spec()), base::string16());
- DCHECK(best_prefix != NULL);
- const int num_components_in_best_prefix = best_prefix->num_components;
- // If the URL is inlineable, we must have a match. Note the prefix that
- // makes it inlineable may be empty.
- DCHECK(best_inlineable_prefix != NULL);
- const int num_components_in_best_inlineable_prefix =
- best_inlineable_prefix->num_components;
- innermost_match = (num_components_in_best_inlineable_prefix ==
- num_components_in_best_prefix);
+ if (!scored_history_match.url_matches.empty() && (terms.size() == 1) &&
+ !IsWhitespace(*lower_string.rbegin())) {
+ const base::string16 gurl_spec = base::UTF8ToUTF16(gurl.spec());
+ const URLPrefix* best_inlineable_prefix =
+ URLPrefix::BestURLPrefix(gurl_spec, terms[0]);
+ if (best_inlineable_prefix) {
+ // Initialize innermost_match.
+ // The idea here is that matches that occur in the scheme or
+ // "www." are worse than matches which don't. For the URLs
+ // "http://www.google.com" and "http://wellsfargo.com", we want
+ // the omnibox input "w" to cause the latter URL to rank higher
+ // than the former. Note that this is not the same as checking
+ // whether one match's inlinable prefix has more components than
+ // the other match's, since in this example, both matches would
+ // have an inlinable prefix of "http://", which is one component.
+ //
+ // Instead, we look for the overall best (i.e., most components)
+ // prefix of the current URL, and then check whether the inlinable
+ // prefix has that many components. If it does, this is an
+ // "innermost" match, and should be boosted. In the example
+ // above, the best prefixes for the two URLs have two and one
+ // components respectively, while the inlinable prefixes each
+ // have one component; this means the first match is not innermost
+ // and the second match is innermost, resulting in us boosting the
+ // second match.
+ //
+ // Now, the code that implements this.
+ // The deepest prefix for this URL regardless of where the match is.
+ const URLPrefix* best_prefix =
+ URLPrefix::BestURLPrefix(gurl_spec, base::string16());
+ DCHECK(best_prefix);
+ // If the URL is inlineable, we must have a match. Note the prefix that
+ // makes it inlineable may be empty.
+ scored_history_match.can_inline = true;
+ scored_history_match.innermost_match =
+ best_inlineable_prefix->num_components == best_prefix->num_components;
+ }
}
- const float topicality_score = GetTopicalityScore(
- terms.size(), url, terms_to_word_starts_offsets, word_starts);
+ const float topicality_score =
+ GetTopicalityScore(terms.size(), url, terms_to_word_starts_offsets,
+ word_starts, &scored_history_match);
const float frequency_score = GetFrequency(
- now, (history_client && history_client->IsBookmarked(gurl)), visits);
- raw_score_ = GetFinalRelevancyScore(topicality_score, frequency_score);
- raw_score_ =
- (raw_score_ <= kint32max) ? static_cast<int>(raw_score_) : kint32max;
+ now, (!is_bookmarked_.is_null() && is_bookmarked_.Run(gurl)), visits);
+ scored_history_match.raw_score = base::saturated_cast<int>(
+ GetFinalRelevancyScore(topicality_score, frequency_score));
- if (also_do_hup_like_scoring_ && can_inline_) {
+ if (kAlsoDoHupLikeScoring && scored_history_match.can_inline) {
// HistoryURL-provider-like scoring gives any match that is
// capable of being inlined a certain minimum score. Some of these
// are given a higher score that lets them be shown in inline.
// This test here derives from the test in
// HistoryURLProvider::PromoteMatchForInlineAutocomplete().
- const bool promote_to_inline = (row.typed_count() > 1) ||
- (IsHostOnly() && (row.typed_count() == 1));
+ const bool promote_to_inline =
+ (row.typed_count() > 1) ||
+ (scored_history_match.IsHostOnly() && (row.typed_count() == 1));
int hup_like_score = promote_to_inline ?
HistoryURLProvider::kScoreForBestInlineableResult :
HistoryURLProvider::kBaseScoreForNonInlineableResult;
@@ -192,123 +284,116 @@ ScoredHistoryMatch::ScoredHistoryMatch(
// low typed count ranges--sometimes it will create/promote when
// this test does not (indeed, we cannot create matches like HUP
// can) and vice versa--but the underlying philosophy is similar.
- if (!promote_to_inline && IsHostOnly())
+ if (!promote_to_inline && scored_history_match.IsHostOnly())
hup_like_score++;
// All the other logic to goes into hup-like-scoring happens in
// the tie-breaker case of MatchScoreGreater().
// Incorporate hup_like_score into raw_score.
- raw_score_ = std::max(raw_score_, hup_like_score);
+ scored_history_match.raw_score =
+ std::max(scored_history_match.raw_score, hup_like_score);
}
// If this match is not inlineable and there's a cap on the maximum
// score that can be given to non-inlineable matches, apply the cap.
- if (!can_inline_ && (max_assigned_score_for_non_inlineable_matches_ != -1)) {
- raw_score_ = std::min(max_assigned_score_for_non_inlineable_matches_,
- raw_score_);
+ if (!scored_history_match.can_inline &&
+ (max_assigned_score_for_non_inlineable_matches != -1)) {
+ scored_history_match.raw_score =
+ std::min(scored_history_match.raw_score,
+ max_assigned_score_for_non_inlineable_matches);
}
// Now that we're done processing this entry, correct the offsets of the
- // matches in |url_matches_| so they point to offsets in the original URL
+ // matches in |url_matches| so they point to offsets in the original URL
// spec, not the cleaned-up URL string that we used for matching.
- std::vector<size_t> offsets = OffsetsFromTermMatches(url_matches_);
+ std::vector<size_t> offsets =
+ OffsetsFromTermMatches(scored_history_match.url_matches);
base::OffsetAdjuster::UnadjustOffsets(adjustments, &offsets);
- url_matches_ = ReplaceOffsetsInTermMatches(url_matches_, offsets);
-}
-
-ScoredHistoryMatch::~ScoredHistoryMatch() {}
-
-// Comparison function for sorting ScoredMatches by their scores with
-// intelligent tie-breaking.
-bool ScoredHistoryMatch::MatchScoreGreater(const ScoredHistoryMatch& m1,
- const ScoredHistoryMatch& m2) {
- if (m1.raw_score_ != m2.raw_score_)
- return m1.raw_score_ > m2.raw_score_;
-
- // This tie-breaking logic is inspired by / largely copied from the
- // ordering logic in history_url_provider.cc CompareHistoryMatch().
-
- // A URL that has been typed at all is better than one that has never been
- // typed. (Note "!"s on each side.)
- if (!m1.url_info.typed_count() != !m2.url_info.typed_count())
- return m1.url_info.typed_count() > m2.url_info.typed_count();
-
- // Innermost matches (matches after any scheme or "www.") are better than
- // non-innermost matches.
- if (m1.innermost_match != m2.innermost_match)
- return m1.innermost_match;
-
- // URLs that have been typed more often are better.
- if (m1.url_info.typed_count() != m2.url_info.typed_count())
- return m1.url_info.typed_count() > m2.url_info.typed_count();
-
- // For URLs that have each been typed once, a host (alone) is better
- // than a page inside.
- if (m1.url_info.typed_count() == 1) {
- if (m1.IsHostOnly() != m2.IsHostOnly())
- return m1.IsHostOnly();
- }
+ scored_history_match.url_matches =
+ ReplaceOffsetsInTermMatches(scored_history_match.url_matches, offsets);
- // URLs that have been visited more often are better.
- if (m1.url_info.visit_count() != m2.url_info.visit_count())
- return m1.url_info.visit_count() > m2.url_info.visit_count();
-
- // URLs that have been visited more recently are better.
- return m1.url_info.last_visit() > m2.url_info.last_visit();
+ return scored_history_match;
}
// static
-TermMatches ScoredHistoryMatch::FilterTermMatchesByWordStarts(
- const TermMatches& term_matches,
- const WordStarts& terms_to_word_starts_offsets,
- const WordStarts& word_starts,
+history::TermMatches
+ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl::FilterTermMatchesByWordStarts(
+ const history::TermMatches& term_matches,
+ const history::WordStarts& terms_to_word_starts_offsets,
+ const history::WordStarts& word_starts,
size_t start_pos,
size_t end_pos) {
// Return early if no filtering is needed.
if (start_pos == std::string::npos)
return term_matches;
- TermMatches filtered_matches;
- WordStarts::const_iterator next_word_starts = word_starts.begin();
- WordStarts::const_iterator end_word_starts = word_starts.end();
- for (TermMatches::const_iterator iter = term_matches.begin();
- iter != term_matches.end(); ++iter) {
- const size_t term_offset = terms_to_word_starts_offsets[iter->term_num];
+ history::TermMatches filtered_matches;
+ history::WordStarts::const_iterator next_word_starts = word_starts.begin();
+ history::WordStarts::const_iterator end_word_starts = word_starts.end();
+ for (const auto& term_match : term_matches) {
+ const size_t term_offset =
+ terms_to_word_starts_offsets[term_match.term_num];
// Advance next_word_starts until it's >= the position of the term we're
// considering (adjusted for where the word begins within the term).
while ((next_word_starts != end_word_starts) &&
- (*next_word_starts < (iter->offset + term_offset)))
+ (*next_word_starts < (term_match.offset + term_offset)))
++next_word_starts;
// Add the match if it's before the position we start filtering at or
// after the position we stop filtering at (assuming we have a position
// to stop filtering at) or if it's at a word boundary.
- if ((iter->offset < start_pos) ||
- ((end_pos != std::string::npos) && (iter->offset >= end_pos)) ||
+ if ((term_match.offset < start_pos) ||
+ ((end_pos != std::string::npos) && (term_match.offset >= end_pos)) ||
((next_word_starts != end_word_starts) &&
- (*next_word_starts == iter->offset + term_offset)))
- filtered_matches.push_back(*iter);
+ (*next_word_starts == term_match.offset + term_offset)))
+ filtered_matches.push_back(term_match);
}
return filtered_matches;
}
-float ScoredHistoryMatch::GetTopicalityScore(
+void ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl::Init() {
+ // Because the code below is not thread safe, we check that we're only calling
+ // it from one thread: the UI thread. Specifically, we check "if we've heard
+ // of the UI thread then we'd better be on it." The first part is necessary
+ // so unit tests pass. (Many unit tests don't set up the threading naming
+ // system; hence CurrentlyOn(UI thread) will fail.)
+ using content::BrowserThread;
+ DCHECK(!BrowserThread::IsThreadInitialized(BrowserThread::UI) ||
+ BrowserThread::CurrentlyOn(BrowserThread::UI));
+
+ if (initialized)
+ return;
+
+ initialized = true;
+
+ // When doing HUP-like scoring, don't allow a non-inlineable match
+ // to beat the score of good inlineable matches. This is a problem
+ // because if a non-inlineable match ends up with the highest score
+ // from HistoryQuick provider, all HistoryQuick matches get demoted
+ // to non-inlineable scores (scores less than 1200). Without
+ // HUP-like-scoring, these results would actually come from the HUP
+ // and not be demoted, thus outscoring the demoted HQP results.
+ // When the HQP provides these, we need to clamp the non-inlineable
+ // results to preserve this behavior.
+ if (kAlsoDoHupLikeScoring) {
+ max_assigned_score_for_non_inlineable_matches =
+ HistoryURLProvider::kScoreForBestInlineableResult - 1;
+ }
+ bookmark_value_ = OmniboxFieldTrial::HQPBookmarkValue();
+ allow_tld_matches_ = OmniboxFieldTrial::HQPAllowMatchInTLDValue();
+ allow_scheme_matches_ = OmniboxFieldTrial::HQPAllowMatchInSchemeValue();
+
+ InitRawTermScoreToTopicalityScoreArray();
+ InitDaysAgoToRecencyScoreArray();
+}
+
+// static
+float ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl::GetTopicalityScore(
const int num_terms,
const base::string16& url,
- const WordStarts& terms_to_word_starts_offsets,
- const RowWordStarts& word_starts) {
- // Because the below thread is not thread safe, we check that we're
- // only calling it from one thread: the UI thread. Specifically,
- // we check "if we've heard of the UI thread then we'd better
- // be on it." The first part is necessary so unit tests pass. (Many
- // unit tests don't set up the threading naming system; hence
- // CurrentlyOn(UI thread) will fail.)
- DCHECK(!content::BrowserThread::IsThreadInitialized(
- content::BrowserThread::UI) ||
- content::BrowserThread::CurrentlyOn(content::BrowserThread::UI));
- if (raw_term_score_to_topicality_score_ == NULL) {
- raw_term_score_to_topicality_score_ = new float[kMaxRawTermScore];
- FillInTermScoreToTopicalityScoreArray();
- }
+ const history::WordStarts& terms_to_word_starts_offsets,
+ const history::RowWordStarts& word_starts,
+ history::ScoredHistoryMatch* scored_history_match) {
+ DCHECK(initialized);
// A vector that accumulates per-term scores. The strongest match--a
// match in the hostname at a word boundary--is worth 10 points.
// Everything else is less. In general, a match that's not at a word
@@ -316,9 +401,9 @@ float ScoredHistoryMatch::GetTopicalityScore(
// in the same part of the URL/title.
DCHECK_GT(num_terms, 0);
std::vector<int> term_scores(num_terms, 0);
- WordStarts::const_iterator next_word_starts =
+ history::WordStarts::const_iterator next_word_starts =
word_starts.url_word_starts_.begin();
- WordStarts::const_iterator end_word_starts =
+ history::WordStarts::const_iterator end_word_starts =
word_starts.url_word_starts_.end();
const size_t question_mark_pos = url.find('?');
const size_t colon_pos = url.find(':');
@@ -337,82 +422,82 @@ float ScoredHistoryMatch::GetTopicalityScore(
// Loop through all URL matches and score them appropriately.
// First, filter all matches not at a word boundary and in the path (or
// later).
- url_matches_ = FilterTermMatchesByWordStarts(
- url_matches_, terms_to_word_starts_offsets, word_starts.url_word_starts_,
- end_of_hostname_pos,
- std::string::npos);
+ scored_history_match->url_matches = FilterTermMatchesByWordStarts(
+ scored_history_match->url_matches, terms_to_word_starts_offsets,
+ word_starts.url_word_starts_, end_of_hostname_pos, std::string::npos);
if (colon_pos != std::string::npos) {
// Also filter matches not at a word boundary and in the scheme.
- url_matches_ = FilterTermMatchesByWordStarts(
- url_matches_, terms_to_word_starts_offsets,
+ scored_history_match->url_matches = FilterTermMatchesByWordStarts(
+ scored_history_match->url_matches, terms_to_word_starts_offsets,
word_starts.url_word_starts_, 0, colon_pos);
}
- for (TermMatches::const_iterator iter = url_matches_.begin();
- iter != url_matches_.end(); ++iter) {
- const size_t term_offset = terms_to_word_starts_offsets[iter->term_num];
+ for (const auto& url_match : scored_history_match->url_matches) {
+ const size_t term_offset = terms_to_word_starts_offsets[url_match.term_num];
// Advance next_word_starts until it's >= the position of the term we're
// considering (adjusted for where the word begins within the term).
while ((next_word_starts != end_word_starts) &&
- (*next_word_starts < (iter->offset + term_offset))) {
+ (*next_word_starts < (url_match.offset + term_offset))) {
++next_word_starts;
}
- const bool at_word_boundary = (next_word_starts != end_word_starts) &&
- (*next_word_starts == iter->offset + term_offset);
+ const bool at_word_boundary =
+ (next_word_starts != end_word_starts) &&
+ (*next_word_starts == url_match.offset + term_offset);
if ((question_mark_pos != std::string::npos) &&
- (iter->offset > question_mark_pos)) {
+ (url_match.offset > question_mark_pos)) {
// The match is in a CGI ?... fragment.
DCHECK(at_word_boundary);
- term_scores[iter->term_num] += 5;
+ term_scores[url_match.term_num] += 5;
} else if ((end_of_hostname_pos != std::string::npos) &&
- (iter->offset > end_of_hostname_pos)) {
+ (url_match.offset > end_of_hostname_pos)) {
// The match is in the path.
DCHECK(at_word_boundary);
- term_scores[iter->term_num] += 8;
+ term_scores[url_match.term_num] += 8;
} else if ((colon_pos == std::string::npos) ||
- (iter->offset > colon_pos)) {
+ (url_match.offset > colon_pos)) {
// The match is in the hostname.
if ((last_part_of_hostname_pos == std::string::npos) ||
- (iter->offset < last_part_of_hostname_pos)) {
+ (url_match.offset < last_part_of_hostname_pos)) {
// Either there are no dots in the hostname or this match isn't
// the last dotted component.
- term_scores[iter->term_num] += at_word_boundary ? 10 : 2;
+ term_scores[url_match.term_num] += at_word_boundary ? 10 : 2;
} else {
// The match is in the last part of a dotted hostname (usually this
// is the top-level domain .com, .net, etc.).
if (allow_tld_matches_)
- term_scores[iter->term_num] += at_word_boundary ? 10 : 0;
+ term_scores[url_match.term_num] += at_word_boundary ? 10 : 0;
}
} else {
// The match is in the protocol (a.k.a. scheme).
// Matches not at a word boundary should have been filtered already.
DCHECK(at_word_boundary);
- match_in_scheme = true;
+ scored_history_match->match_in_scheme = true;
if (allow_scheme_matches_)
- term_scores[iter->term_num] += 10;
+ term_scores[url_match.term_num] += 10;
}
}
// Now do the analogous loop over all matches in the title.
next_word_starts = word_starts.title_word_starts_.begin();
end_word_starts = word_starts.title_word_starts_.end();
int word_num = 0;
- title_matches_ = FilterTermMatchesByWordStarts(
- title_matches_, terms_to_word_starts_offsets,
+ scored_history_match->title_matches = FilterTermMatchesByWordStarts(
+ scored_history_match->title_matches, terms_to_word_starts_offsets,
word_starts.title_word_starts_, 0, std::string::npos);
- for (TermMatches::const_iterator iter = title_matches_.begin();
- iter != title_matches_.end(); ++iter) {
- const size_t term_offset = terms_to_word_starts_offsets[iter->term_num];
+ for (const auto& title_match : scored_history_match->title_matches) {
+ const size_t term_offset =
+ terms_to_word_starts_offsets[title_match.term_num];
// Advance next_word_starts until it's >= the position of the term we're
// considering (adjusted for where the word begins within the term).
while ((next_word_starts != end_word_starts) &&
- (*next_word_starts < (iter->offset + term_offset))) {
+ (*next_word_starts < (title_match.offset + term_offset))) {
++next_word_starts;
++word_num;
}
- if (word_num >= 10) break; // only count the first ten words
+ if (word_num >= 10)
+ break; // only count the first ten words
DCHECK(next_word_starts != end_word_starts);
- DCHECK_EQ(*next_word_starts, iter->offset + term_offset)
+ DCHECK_EQ(*next_word_starts, title_match.offset + term_offset)
<< "not at word boundary";
- term_scores[iter->term_num] += 8;
+ term_scores[title_match.term_num] += 8;
}
// TODO(mpearson): Restore logic for penalizing out-of-order matches.
// (Perhaps discount them by 0.8?)
@@ -423,17 +508,16 @@ float ScoredHistoryMatch::GetTopicalityScore(
// Compute the topicality_score as the sum of transformed term_scores.
float topicality_score = 0;
- for (size_t i = 0; i < term_scores.size(); ++i) {
+ for (int term_score : term_scores) {
// Drop this URL if it seems like a term didn't appear or, more precisely,
// didn't appear in a part of the URL or title that we trust enough
// to give it credit for. For instance, terms that appear in the middle
// of a CGI parameter get no credit. Almost all the matches dropped
// due to this test would look stupid if shown to the user.
- if (term_scores[i] == 0)
+ if (term_score == 0)
return 0;
- topicality_score += raw_term_score_to_topicality_score_[
- (term_scores[i] >= kMaxRawTermScore) ? (kMaxRawTermScore - 1) :
- term_scores[i]];
+ topicality_score += raw_term_score_to_topicality_score[std::min(
+ term_score, kMaxRawTermScore - 1)];
}
// TODO(mpearson): If there are multiple terms, consider taking the
// geometric mean of per-term scores rather than the arithmetic mean.
@@ -442,86 +526,21 @@ float ScoredHistoryMatch::GetTopicalityScore(
}
// static
-void ScoredHistoryMatch::FillInTermScoreToTopicalityScoreArray() {
- for (int term_score = 0; term_score < kMaxRawTermScore; ++term_score) {
- float topicality_score;
- if (term_score < 10) {
- // If the term scores less than 10 points (no full-credit hit, or
- // no combination of hits that score that well), then the topicality
- // score is linear in the term score.
- topicality_score = 0.1 * term_score;
- } else {
- // For term scores of at least ten points, pass them through a log
- // function so a score of 10 points gets a 1.0 (to meet up exactly
- // with the linear component) and increases logarithmically until
- // maxing out at 30 points, with computes to a score around 2.1.
- topicality_score = (1.0 + 2.25 * log10(0.1 * term_score));
- }
- raw_term_score_to_topicality_score_[term_score] = topicality_score;
- }
-}
-
-// static
-float ScoredHistoryMatch::GetRecencyScore(int last_visit_days_ago) {
- // Because the below thread is not thread safe, we check that we're
- // only calling it from one thread: the UI thread. Specifically,
- // we check "if we've heard of the UI thread then we'd better
- // be on it." The first part is necessary so unit tests pass. (Many
- // unit tests don't set up the threading naming system; hence
- // CurrentlyOn(UI thread) will fail.)
- DCHECK(!content::BrowserThread::IsThreadInitialized(
- content::BrowserThread::UI) ||
- content::BrowserThread::CurrentlyOn(content::BrowserThread::UI));
- if (days_ago_to_recency_score_ == NULL) {
- days_ago_to_recency_score_ = new float[kDaysToPrecomputeRecencyScoresFor];
- FillInDaysAgoToRecencyScoreArray();
- }
+float ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl::GetRecencyScore(int last_visit_days_ago) {
+ DCHECK(initialized);
// Lookup the score in days_ago_to_recency_score, treating
// everything older than what we've precomputed as the oldest thing
// we've precomputed. The std::max is to protect against corruption
// in the database (in case last_visit_days_ago is negative).
- return days_ago_to_recency_score_[
- std::max(
- std::min(last_visit_days_ago, kDaysToPrecomputeRecencyScoresFor - 1),
- 0)];
-}
-
-void ScoredHistoryMatch::FillInDaysAgoToRecencyScoreArray() {
- for (int days_ago = 0; days_ago < kDaysToPrecomputeRecencyScoresFor;
- days_ago++) {
- int unnormalized_recency_score;
- if (days_ago <= 4) {
- unnormalized_recency_score = 100;
- } else if (days_ago <= 14) {
- // Linearly extrapolate between 4 and 14 days so 14 days has a score
- // of 70.
- unnormalized_recency_score = 70 + (14 - days_ago) * (100 - 70) / (14 - 4);
- } else if (days_ago <= 31) {
- // Linearly extrapolate between 14 and 31 days so 31 days has a score
- // of 50.
- unnormalized_recency_score = 50 + (31 - days_ago) * (70 - 50) / (31 - 14);
- } else if (days_ago <= 90) {
- // Linearly extrapolate between 30 and 90 days so 90 days has a score
- // of 30.
- unnormalized_recency_score = 30 + (90 - days_ago) * (50 - 30) / (90 - 30);
- } else {
- // Linearly extrapolate between 90 and 365 days so 365 days has a score
- // of 10.
- unnormalized_recency_score =
- 10 + (365 - days_ago) * (20 - 10) / (365 - 90);
- }
- days_ago_to_recency_score_[days_ago] = unnormalized_recency_score / 100.0;
- if (days_ago > 0) {
- DCHECK_LE(days_ago_to_recency_score_[days_ago],
- days_ago_to_recency_score_[days_ago - 1]);
- }
- }
+ return days_ago_to_recency_score[std::max(
+ std::min(last_visit_days_ago, kDaysToPrecomputeRecencyScoresFor - 1), 0)];
}
// static
-float ScoredHistoryMatch::GetFrequency(const base::Time& now,
- const bool bookmarked,
- const VisitInfoVector& visits) {
+float ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl::GetFrequency(
+ const base::Time& now,
+ const bool bookmarked,
+ const history::VisitInfoVector& visits) {
// Compute the weighted average |value_of_transition| over the last at
// most kMaxVisitsToScore visits, where each visit is weighted using
// GetRecencyScore() based on how many days ago it happened. Use
@@ -529,7 +548,9 @@ float ScoredHistoryMatch::GetFrequency(const base::Time& now,
// how many visits there were in order to penalize a match that has
// fewer visits than kMaxVisitsToScore.
float summed_visit_points = 0;
- for (size_t i = 0; i < std::min(visits.size(), kMaxVisitsToScore); ++i) {
+ const size_t max_visit_to_score =
+ std::min(visits.size(), history::ScoredHistoryMatch::kMaxVisitsToScore);
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < max_visit_to_score; ++i) {
int value_of_transition =
(visits[i].second == ui::PAGE_TRANSITION_TYPED) ? 20 : 1;
if (bookmarked)
@@ -538,12 +559,14 @@ float ScoredHistoryMatch::GetFrequency(const base::Time& now,
GetRecencyScore((now - visits[i].first).InDays());
summed_visit_points += (value_of_transition * bucket_weight);
}
- return visits.size() * summed_visit_points / kMaxVisitsToScore;
+ return visits.size() * summed_visit_points /
+ history::ScoredHistoryMatch::kMaxVisitsToScore;
}
// static
-float ScoredHistoryMatch::GetFinalRelevancyScore(float topicality_score,
- float frequency_score) {
+float ScoredHistoryMatchBuilderImpl::GetFinalRelevancyScore(
+ float topicality_score,
+ float frequency_score) {
if (topicality_score == 0)
return 0;
// Here's how to interpret intermediate_score: Suppose the omnibox
@@ -581,28 +604,3 @@ float ScoredHistoryMatch::GetFinalRelevancyScore(float topicality_score,
const float slope = (1399 - 1300) / (20.0f - 12.0f);
return std::min(1399.0, 1300 + slope * (intermediate_score - 12.0));
}
-
-void ScoredHistoryMatch::Init() {
- if (initialized_)
- return;
- also_do_hup_like_scoring_ = false;
- // When doing HUP-like scoring, don't allow a non-inlineable match
- // to beat the score of good inlineable matches. This is a problem
- // because if a non-inlineable match ends up with the highest score
- // from HistoryQuick provider, all HistoryQuick matches get demoted
- // to non-inlineable scores (scores less than 1200). Without
- // HUP-like-scoring, these results would actually come from the HUP
- // and not be demoted, thus outscoring the demoted HQP results.
- // When the HQP provides these, we need to clamp the non-inlineable
- // results to preserve this behavior.
- if (also_do_hup_like_scoring_) {
- max_assigned_score_for_non_inlineable_matches_ =
- HistoryURLProvider::kScoreForBestInlineableResult - 1;
- }
- bookmark_value_ = OmniboxFieldTrial::HQPBookmarkValue();
- allow_tld_matches_ = OmniboxFieldTrial::HQPAllowMatchInTLDValue();
- allow_scheme_matches_ = OmniboxFieldTrial::HQPAllowMatchInSchemeValue();
- initialized_ = true;
-}
-
-} // namespace history

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698