Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1190)

Unified Diff: Source/core/rendering/RenderLayer.cpp

Issue 88863002: Land layer squashing behind a flag (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/blink/trunk
Patch Set: Addressed reviewer feedback Created 7 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: Source/core/rendering/RenderLayer.cpp
diff --git a/Source/core/rendering/RenderLayer.cpp b/Source/core/rendering/RenderLayer.cpp
index aa8d0e1601e68c17665463eacacb33799dc2366d..b3887dd1aa7fa6650afe81bf48bac5856a4e9a00 100644
--- a/Source/core/rendering/RenderLayer.cpp
+++ b/Source/core/rendering/RenderLayer.cpp
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ RenderLayer::RenderLayer(RenderLayerModelObject* renderer)
, m_staticInlinePosition(0)
, m_staticBlockPosition(0)
, m_enclosingPaginationLayer(0)
+ , m_groupedMapping(0)
, m_repainter(renderer)
, m_clipper(renderer)
{
@@ -1110,15 +1111,16 @@ static inline const RenderLayer* compositingContainer(const RenderLayer* layer)
// FIXME: having two different functions named enclosingCompositingLayer and enclosingCompositingLayerForRepaint
// is error-prone and misleading for reading code that uses these functions - especially compounded with
-// the includeSelf option. It is very likely that some call sites of this function actually mean to use
-// enclosingCompositingLayerForRepaint().
+// the includeSelf option. It is very likely that we don't even want either of these functions; A layer
+// should be told explicitly which GraphicsLayer is the repaintContainer for a RenderLayer, and
+// any other use cases should probably have an API between the non-compositing and compositing sides of code.
RenderLayer* RenderLayer::enclosingCompositingLayer(bool includeSelf) const
{
- if (includeSelf && hasCompositedLayerMapping())
+ if (includeSelf && compositingState() != NotComposited && compositingState() != PaintsIntoGroupedBacking)
return const_cast<RenderLayer*>(this);
for (const RenderLayer* curr = compositingContainer(this); curr; curr = compositingContainer(curr)) {
- if (curr->hasCompositedLayerMapping())
+ if (curr->compositingState() != NotComposited && curr->compositingState() != PaintsIntoGroupedBacking)
return const_cast<RenderLayer*>(curr);
}
@@ -1127,11 +1129,11 @@ RenderLayer* RenderLayer::enclosingCompositingLayer(bool includeSelf) const
RenderLayer* RenderLayer::enclosingCompositingLayerForRepaint(bool includeSelf) const
{
- if (includeSelf && compositingState() == PaintsIntoOwnBacking)
+ if (includeSelf && (compositingState() == PaintsIntoOwnBacking || compositingState() == PaintsIntoGroupedBacking))
return const_cast<RenderLayer*>(this);
for (const RenderLayer* curr = compositingContainer(this); curr; curr = compositingContainer(curr)) {
- if (curr->compositingState() == PaintsIntoOwnBacking)
+ if (curr->compositingState() == PaintsIntoOwnBacking || curr->compositingState() == PaintsIntoGroupedBacking)
return const_cast<RenderLayer*>(curr);
}
@@ -1884,7 +1886,7 @@ static bool paintForFixedRootBackground(const RenderLayer* layer, PaintLayerFlag
void RenderLayer::paintLayer(GraphicsContext* context, const LayerPaintingInfo& paintingInfo, PaintLayerFlags paintFlags)
{
- if (compositingState() != NotComposited) {
+ if (compositingState() != NotComposited && compositingState() != PaintsIntoGroupedBacking) {
// The updatingControlTints() painting pass goes through compositing layers,
// but we need to ensure that we don't cache clip rects computed with the wrong root in this case.
if (context->updatingControlTints() || (paintingInfo.paintBehavior & PaintBehaviorFlattenCompositingLayers)) {
@@ -3636,6 +3638,12 @@ CompositingState RenderLayer::compositingState() const
// This is computed procedurally so there is no redundant state variable that
// can get out of sync from the real actual compositing state.
+ if (m_groupedMapping) {
+ ASSERT(compositor()->isLayerSquashingEnabled());
+ ASSERT(!m_compositedLayerMapping);
+ return PaintsIntoGroupedBacking;
+ }
+
if (!m_compositedLayerMapping)
return NotComposited;
@@ -3987,10 +3995,17 @@ void RenderLayer::styleChanged(StyleDifference, const RenderStyle* oldStyle)
if (compositor()->updateLayerCompositingState(this)
|| needsCompositingLayersRebuiltForClip(oldStyle, newStyle)
|| needsCompositingLayersRebuiltForOverflow(oldStyle, newStyle)
- || needsCompositingLayersRebuiltForFilters(oldStyle, newStyle, didPaintWithFilters))
+ || needsCompositingLayersRebuiltForFilters(oldStyle, newStyle, didPaintWithFilters)) {
compositor()->setCompositingLayersNeedRebuild();
- else if (hasCompositedLayerMapping())
+ } else if (compositingState() == PaintsIntoOwnBacking || compositingState() == HasOwnBackingButPaintsIntoAncestor) {
+ ASSERT(hasCompositedLayerMapping());
compositedLayerMapping()->updateGraphicsLayerGeometry();
+ } else if (compositingState() == PaintsIntoGroupedBacking) {
+ ASSERT(compositor()->isLayerSquashingEnabled());
+ ASSERT(groupedMapping());
+ // FIXME: double-check that updateGraphicsLayerGeometry is not necessary (well the squashing portion is what might be needed? but probably not)...
Ian Vollick 2013/12/02 21:17:05 Hmm. It'd be handy if we had up-to-date geometry f
+ // FIXME: do we need to take any action here for a squashed layer?
+ }
}
bool RenderLayer::scrollsOverflow() const

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698