Chromium Code Reviews| Index: ui/views/focus/focus_traversal_unittest.cc |
| diff --git a/ui/views/focus/focus_traversal_unittest.cc b/ui/views/focus/focus_traversal_unittest.cc |
| index cd24bd505a4632d9f61e19eb9267d97f892a0e5c..cc3b35296eac2668f6606f58e081c09ef93e81e8 100644 |
| --- a/ui/views/focus/focus_traversal_unittest.cc |
| +++ b/ui/views/focus/focus_traversal_unittest.cc |
| @@ -259,13 +259,17 @@ void FocusTraversalTest::InitContentView() { |
| // NativeButton * kCancelButtonID |
| // NativeButton * kHelpButtonID |
| // TabbedPane * kStyleContainerID |
| + // TabStrip |
| + // Tab ("Style") |
| + // Tab ("Other") |
| // View |
| - // Checkbox * kBoldCheckBoxID |
| - // Checkbox * kItalicCheckBoxID |
| - // Checkbox * kUnderlinedCheckBoxID |
| - // Link * kStyleHelpLinkID |
| - // Textfield * kStyleTextEditID |
| - // Other |
| + // View |
| + // Checkbox * kBoldCheckBoxID |
| + // Checkbox * kItalicCheckBoxID |
| + // Checkbox * kUnderlinedCheckBoxID |
| + // Link * kStyleHelpLinkID |
| + // Textfield * kStyleTextEditID |
| + // View |
| // BorderView kSearchContainerID |
| // View |
| // Textfield * kSearchTextfieldID |
| @@ -770,4 +774,77 @@ TEST_F(FocusTraversalTest, PaneTraversal) { |
| } |
| } |
| +class FocusTraversalNonFocusableTest : public FocusManagerTest { |
| + public: |
| + ~FocusTraversalNonFocusableTest() override {} |
| + |
| + void InitContentView() override; |
| + |
| + protected: |
| + FocusTraversalNonFocusableTest() {} |
| + |
| + private: |
| + DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(FocusTraversalNonFocusableTest); |
| +}; |
| + |
| +void FocusTraversalNonFocusableTest::InitContentView() { |
|
dmazzoni
2015/02/02 22:07:04
Just to clarify, is your intent that this test wou
Matt Giuca
2015/02/02 23:17:31
Yes, that is the behaviour of the test prior to th
|
| + // Create a complex nested view hierarchy with no focusable views. This is a |
| + // regression test for http://crbug.com/453699. There was previously a bug |
| + // where advancing focus backwards through this tree resulted in an |
| + // exponential number of nodes being searched. (Each time it traverses one of |
| + // the x1-x3-x2 triangles, it will traverse the left sibling of x1, (x+1)0, |
| + // twice, which means it will visit O(2^n) nodes.) |
| + // |
| + // 0 |
| + // / \ |
| + // / \ |
| + // 10 1 |
| + // / \ / \ |
| + // / \ / \ |
| + // 20 11 2 3 |
| + // / \ / \ |
| + // / \ / \ |
| + // ... 21 12 13 |
| + // / \ |
| + // / \ |
| + // 22 23 |
| + |
| + View* v = GetContentsView(); |
| + // Create 30 groups of 4 nodes. |v| is the top of each group. |
| + for (int i = 0; i < 300; i += 10) { |
| + // |v|'s left child is the top of the next group. If |v| is 20, this is 30. |
| + View* v10 = new View; |
| + v10->set_id(i + 10); |
| + v->AddChildView(v10); |
| + |
| + // |v|'s right child. If |v| is 20, this is 21. |
| + View* v1 = new View; |
| + v1->set_id(i + 1); |
| + v->AddChildView(v1); |
| + |
| + // |v|'s right child has two children. If |v| is 20, these are 22 and 23. |
| + View* v2 = new View; |
| + v2->set_id(i + 2); |
| + View* v3 = new View; |
| + v3->set_id(i + 3); |
| + v1->AddChildView(v2); |
| + v1->AddChildView(v3); |
| + |
| + v = v10; |
| + } |
| +} |
| + |
| +// See explanation in InitContentView. |
| +TEST_F(FocusTraversalNonFocusableTest, PathologicalSiblingTraversal) { |
| + // Advance forwards from the root node. |
| + GetFocusManager()->ClearFocus(); |
| + GetFocusManager()->AdvanceFocus(false); |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(GetFocusManager()->GetFocusedView()); |
| + |
| + // Advance backwards from the root node. |
| + GetFocusManager()->ClearFocus(); |
| + GetFocusManager()->AdvanceFocus(true); |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(GetFocusManager()->GetFocusedView()); |
| +} |
| + |
| } // namespace views |