OLD | NEW |
(Empty) | |
| 1 # 2014-03-21 |
| 2 # |
| 3 # The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of |
| 4 # a legal notice, here is a blessing: |
| 5 # |
| 6 # May you do good and not evil. |
| 7 # May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others. |
| 8 # May you share freely, never taking more than you give. |
| 9 # |
| 10 #*********************************************************************** |
| 11 # This file implements regression tests for SQLite library. The |
| 12 # focus of this file is testing that the block-sort optimization. |
| 13 # |
| 14 |
| 15 |
| 16 set testdir [file dirname $argv0] |
| 17 source $testdir/tester.tcl |
| 18 set ::testprefix orderby6 |
| 19 |
| 20 # Run all tests twice. Once with a normal table and a second time |
| 21 # with a WITHOUT ROWID table |
| 22 # |
| 23 foreach {tn rowidclause} {1 {} 2 {WITHOUT ROWID}} { |
| 24 |
| 25 # Construct a table with 1000 rows and a split primary key |
| 26 # |
| 27 reset_db |
| 28 do_test $tn.1 { |
| 29 db eval "CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c,PRIMARY KEY(b,c)) $rowidclause;" |
| 30 db eval { |
| 31 WITH RECURSIVE |
| 32 cnt(x) AS (VALUES(1) UNION ALL SELECT x+1 FROM cnt WHERE x<1000) |
| 33 INSERT INTO t1 SELECT x, x%40, x/40 FROM cnt; |
| 34 } |
| 35 } {} |
| 36 |
| 37 # Run various ORDER BY queries that can benefit from block-sort. |
| 38 # Compare the output to the same output using a full-sort enforced |
| 39 # by adding + to each term of the ORDER BY clause. |
| 40 # |
| 41 do_execsql_test $tn.2 { |
| 42 SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY b,a,c; |
| 43 } [db eval {SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY +b,+a,+c}] |
| 44 do_execsql_test $tn.3 { |
| 45 SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY b,c DESC,a; |
| 46 } [db eval {SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY +b,+c DESC,+a}] |
| 47 do_execsql_test $tn.4 { |
| 48 SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC,c,a; |
| 49 } [db eval {SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY +b DESC,+c,+a}] |
| 50 do_execsql_test $tn.5 { |
| 51 SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC,a,c; |
| 52 } [db eval {SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY +b DESC,+a,+c}] |
| 53 |
| 54 # LIMIT and OFFSET clauses on block-sort queries. |
| 55 # |
| 56 do_execsql_test $tn.11 { |
| 57 SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY b, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 20; |
| 58 } {840 880 920 960 1000 1 41 81 121 161} |
| 59 do_execsql_test $tn.11x { |
| 60 SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY +b, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 20; |
| 61 } {840 880 920 960 1000 1 41 81 121 161} |
| 62 |
| 63 do_execsql_test $tn.12 { |
| 64 SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 20; |
| 65 } {839 879 919 959 999 38 78 118 158 198} |
| 66 do_execsql_test $tn.12 { |
| 67 SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY +b DESC, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 20; |
| 68 } {839 879 919 959 999 38 78 118 158 198} |
| 69 |
| 70 do_execsql_test $tn.13 { |
| 71 SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY b, a DESC LIMIT 10 OFFSET 45; |
| 72 } {161 121 81 41 1 962 922 882 842 802} |
| 73 do_execsql_test $tn.13x { |
| 74 SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY +b, a DESC LIMIT 10 OFFSET 45; |
| 75 } {161 121 81 41 1 962 922 882 842 802} |
| 76 |
| 77 do_execsql_test $tn.14 { |
| 78 SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 45; |
| 79 } {838 878 918 958 998 37 77 117 157 197} |
| 80 do_execsql_test $tn.14x { |
| 81 SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY +b DESC, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 45; |
| 82 } {838 878 918 958 998 37 77 117 157 197} |
| 83 |
| 84 # Many test cases where the LIMIT+OFFSET window is in various |
| 85 # alignments with block-sort boundaries. |
| 86 # |
| 87 foreach {tx limit offset orderby} { |
| 88 1 10 24 {+b,+a} |
| 89 2 10 25 {+b,+a} |
| 90 3 10 26 {+b,+a} |
| 91 4 10 39 {+b,+a} |
| 92 5 10 40 {+b,+a} |
| 93 6 10 41 {+b,+a} |
| 94 7 27 24 {+b,+a} |
| 95 8 27 49 {+b,+a} |
| 96 11 10 24 {+b DESC,+a} |
| 97 12 10 25 {+b DESC,+a} |
| 98 13 10 26 {+b DESC,+a} |
| 99 14 10 39 {+b DESC,+a} |
| 100 15 10 40 {+b DESC,+a} |
| 101 16 10 41 {+b DESC,+a} |
| 102 17 27 24 {+b DESC,+a} |
| 103 18 27 49 {+b DESC,+a} |
| 104 21 10 24 {+b,+a DESC} |
| 105 22 10 25 {+b,+a DESC} |
| 106 23 10 26 {+b,+a DESC} |
| 107 24 10 39 {+b,+a DESC} |
| 108 25 10 40 {+b,+a DESC} |
| 109 26 10 41 {+b,+a DESC} |
| 110 27 27 24 {+b,+a DESC} |
| 111 28 27 49 {+b,+a DESC} |
| 112 31 10 24 {+b DESC,+a DESC} |
| 113 32 10 25 {+b DESC,+a DESC} |
| 114 33 10 26 {+b DESC,+a DESC} |
| 115 34 10 39 {+b DESC,+a DESC} |
| 116 35 10 40 {+b DESC,+a DESC} |
| 117 36 10 41 {+b DESC,+a DESC} |
| 118 37 27 24 {+b DESC,+a DESC} |
| 119 38 27 49 {+b DESC,+a DESC} |
| 120 } { |
| 121 set sql1 "SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY $orderby LIMIT $limit OFFSET $offset;" |
| 122 set sql2 [string map {+ {}} $sql1] |
| 123 # puts $sql2\n$sql1\n[db eval $sql2] |
| 124 do_test $tn.21.$tx {db eval $::sql2} [db eval $sql1] |
| 125 } |
| 126 |
| 127 ######################################################################## |
| 128 # A second test table, t2, has many columns open to sorting. |
| 129 do_test $tn.31 { |
| 130 db eval "CREATE TABLE t2(a,b,c,d,e,f,PRIMARY KEY(b,c,d,e,f)) $rowidclause;" |
| 131 db eval { |
| 132 WITH RECURSIVE |
| 133 cnt(x) AS (VALUES(0) UNION ALL SELECT x+1 FROM cnt WHERE x<242) |
| 134 INSERT INTO t2 SELECT x, x%3, (x/3)%3, (x/9)%3, (x/27)%3, (x/81)%3 |
| 135 FROM cnt; |
| 136 } |
| 137 } {} |
| 138 |
| 139 do_execsql_test $tn.32 { |
| 140 SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,e,f; |
| 141 } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f;}] |
| 142 do_execsql_test $tn.33 { |
| 143 SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,e,+f; |
| 144 } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f;}] |
| 145 do_execsql_test $tn.34 { |
| 146 SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,+e,+f; |
| 147 } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f;}] |
| 148 do_execsql_test $tn.35 { |
| 149 SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,+d,+e,+f; |
| 150 } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f;}] |
| 151 do_execsql_test $tn.36 { |
| 152 SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,+c,+d,+e,+f; |
| 153 } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f;}] |
| 154 |
| 155 do_execsql_test $tn.37 { |
| 156 SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,e,f DESC; |
| 157 } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f DESC;}] |
| 158 do_execsql_test $tn.38 { |
| 159 SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,e DESC,f; |
| 160 } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e DESC,+f;}] |
| 161 do_execsql_test $tn.39 { |
| 162 SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d DESC,e,f; |
| 163 } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d DESC,+e,+f;}] |
| 164 do_execsql_test $tn.40 { |
| 165 SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c DESC,d,e,f; |
| 166 } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c DESC,+d,+e,+f;}] |
| 167 do_execsql_test $tn.41 { |
| 168 SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b DESC,c,d,e,f; |
| 169 } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b DESC,+c,+d,+e,+f;}] |
| 170 |
| 171 do_execsql_test $tn.42 { |
| 172 SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b DESC,c DESC,d,e,f LIMIT 31; |
| 173 } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b DESC,+c DESC,+d,+e,+f LIMIT 31}] |
| 174 do_execsql_test $tn.43 { |
| 175 SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,e,f DESC LIMIT 8 OFFSET 7; |
| 176 } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f DESC LIMIT 8 OFFSET 7}] |
| 177 |
| 178 |
| 179 } |
| 180 |
| 181 |
| 182 |
| 183 finish_test |
OLD | NEW |