Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(535)

Side by Side Diff: courgette/disassembler_win32_x64.cc

Issue 878043002: Add support for RIP relative addresses on x86_64. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: rebase merge 212563003 Created 5 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « AUTHORS ('k') | courgette/encode_decode_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Toggle Intra-line Diffs ('i') | Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
OLDNEW
1 // Copyright 2013 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. 1 // Copyright 2013 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be 2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
3 // found in the LICENSE file. 3 // found in the LICENSE file.
4 4
5 #include "courgette/disassembler_win32_x64.h" 5 #include "courgette/disassembler_win32_x64.h"
6 6
7 #include <algorithm> 7 #include <algorithm>
8 #include <string> 8 #include <string>
9 #include <vector> 9 #include <vector>
10 10
(...skipping 443 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
454 } 454 }
455 } 455 }
456 456
457 //while (abs32_pos != abs32_locations_.end() && *abs32_pos < current_rva) 457 //while (abs32_pos != abs32_locations_.end() && *abs32_pos < current_rva)
458 // ++abs32_pos; 458 // ++abs32_pos;
459 459
460 // Heuristic discovery of rel32 locations in instruction stream: are the 460 // Heuristic discovery of rel32 locations in instruction stream: are the
461 // next few bytes the start of an instruction containing a rel32 461 // next few bytes the start of an instruction containing a rel32
462 // addressing mode? 462 // addressing mode?
463 const uint8* rel32 = NULL; 463 const uint8* rel32 = NULL;
464 bool is_rip_relative = false;
464 465
465 if (p + 5 <= end_pointer) { 466 if (p + 5 <= end_pointer) {
dgarrett 2015/03/10 03:03:48 This CL isn't introducing the pattern, but shouldn
Will Harris 2015/03/12 05:33:28 yes, none of the blocks will ever collide with eac
dgarrett 2015/03/12 16:40:54 For some reason, I read the "rel32 = p + 2" type l
466 if (*p == 0xE8 || *p == 0xE9) { // jmp rel32 and call rel32 467 if (*p == 0xE8 || *p == 0xE9) { // jmp rel32 and call rel32
467 rel32 = p + 1; 468 rel32 = p + 1;
469 is_rip_relative = false;
rickyz (no longer on Chrome) 2015/03/10 05:13:50 Fine if you prefer it this way, but no need to set
Will Harris 2015/03/12 05:33:28 Done.
468 } 470 }
469 } 471 }
470 if (p + 6 <= end_pointer) { 472 if (p + 6 <= end_pointer) {
471 if (*p == 0x0F && (*(p+1) & 0xF0) == 0x80) { // Jcc long form 473 if (*p == 0x0F && (*(p+1) & 0xF0) == 0x80) { // Jcc long form
rickyz (no longer on Chrome) 2015/03/10 05:13:50 nit: Could we use p[1] or *(p + 1) consistently ev
Will Harris 2015/03/12 05:33:28 Done.
472 if (p[1] != 0x8A && p[1] != 0x8B) // JPE/JPO unlikely 474 if (p[1] != 0x8A && p[1] != 0x8B) { // JPE/JPO unlikely
473 rel32 = p + 2; 475 rel32 = p + 2;
476 is_rip_relative = false;
477 }
478 } else if (*p == 0xFF && (*(p + 1) == 0x15 || *(p + 1) == 0x25)) {
479 // rip relative call/jmp
480 rel32 = p + 2;
481 is_rip_relative = true;
474 } 482 }
475 } 483 }
484 if (p + 7 <= end_pointer) {
485 if ((*p & 0xFE) == 0x48 && *(p + 1) == 0x8D &&
rickyz (no longer on Chrome) 2015/03/10 05:13:50 Did you mean to use 0xFB here and below? Otherwise
Will Harris 2015/03/12 05:33:28 Done. Good spot.
486 (*(p + 2) & 0xC7) == 0x05) {
487 // rip relative lea
488 rel32 = p + 3;
489 is_rip_relative = true;
490 } else if ((*p & 0xFE) == 0x48 && *(p + 1) == 0x8B &&
491 (*(p + 2) & 0xC7) == 0x05) {
492 // rip relative mov
493 rel32 = p + 3;
494 is_rip_relative = true;
495 }
496 }
rickyz (no longer on Chrome) 2015/03/10 05:13:50 Out of curiosity, how do we decide which instructi
Will Harris 2015/03/12 05:33:28 I agree that there is probably still some scope he
497
476 if (rel32) { 498 if (rel32) {
477 RVA rel32_rva = static_cast<RVA>(rel32 - adjust_pointer_to_rva); 499 RVA rel32_rva = static_cast<RVA>(rel32 - adjust_pointer_to_rva);
478 500
479 // Is there an abs32 reloc overlapping the candidate? 501 // Is there an abs32 reloc overlapping the candidate?
480 while (abs32_pos != abs32_locations_.end() && *abs32_pos < rel32_rva - 3) 502 while (abs32_pos != abs32_locations_.end() && *abs32_pos < rel32_rva - 3)
481 ++abs32_pos; 503 ++abs32_pos;
482 // Now: (*abs32_pos > rel32_rva - 4) i.e. the lowest addressed 4-byte 504 // Now: (*abs32_pos > rel32_rva - 4) i.e. the lowest addressed 4-byte
483 // region that could overlap rel32_rva. 505 // region that could overlap rel32_rva.
484 if (abs32_pos != abs32_locations_.end()) { 506 if (abs32_pos != abs32_locations_.end()) {
485 if (*abs32_pos < rel32_rva + 4) { 507 if (*abs32_pos < rel32_rva + 4) {
486 // Beginning of abs32 reloc is before end of rel32 reloc so they 508 // Beginning of abs32 reloc is before end of rel32 reloc so they
487 // overlap. Skip four bytes past the abs32 reloc. 509 // overlap. Skip four bytes past the abs32 reloc.
488 p += (*abs32_pos + 4) - current_rva; 510 p += (*abs32_pos + 4) - current_rva;
489 continue; 511 continue;
490 } 512 }
491 } 513 }
492 514
493 RVA target_rva = rel32_rva + 4 + Read32LittleEndian(rel32); 515 RVA target_rva = rel32_rva + 4 + Read32LittleEndian(rel32);
494 // To be valid, rel32 target must be within image, and within this 516 // To be valid, rel32 target must be within image, and within this
495 // section. 517 // section.
496 if (IsValidRVA(target_rva) && 518 if (IsValidRVA(target_rva) &&
497 start_rva <= target_rva && target_rva < end_rva) { 519 (is_rip_relative ||
520 start_rva <= target_rva && target_rva < end_rva)) {
498 rel32_locations_.push_back(rel32_rva); 521 rel32_locations_.push_back(rel32_rva);
499 #if COURGETTE_HISTOGRAM_TARGETS 522 #if COURGETTE_HISTOGRAM_TARGETS
500 ++rel32_target_rvas_[target_rva]; 523 ++rel32_target_rvas_[target_rva];
501 #endif 524 #endif
502 p = rel32 + 4; 525 p = rel32 + 4;
503 continue; 526 continue;
504 } 527 }
505 } 528 }
506 p += 1; 529 p += 1;
507 } 530 }
(...skipping 217 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
725 directory->size_ = static_cast<uint32>(size); 748 directory->size_ = static_cast<uint32>(size);
726 return true; 749 return true;
727 } else { 750 } else {
728 directory->address_ = 0; 751 directory->address_ = 0;
729 directory->size_ = 0; 752 directory->size_ = 0;
730 return true; 753 return true;
731 } 754 }
732 } 755 }
733 756
734 } // namespace courgette 757 } // namespace courgette
OLDNEW
« no previous file with comments | « AUTHORS ('k') | courgette/encode_decode_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698